Cargando…

Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasingly prevalent and has significantly heterogeneous risks of survival for diagnosed individuals due to the inter-related risk factors. Precise prediction of the risk of survival for an individual patient with OPSCC presents a usef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Zhen, Zhou, Xinyi, Fu, Leiwen, Li, Yuwei, Tian, Tian, Liu, Qi, Zou, Huachun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37827742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073375
_version_ 1785122453168586752
author Lu, Zhen
Zhou, Xinyi
Fu, Leiwen
Li, Yuwei
Tian, Tian
Liu, Qi
Zou, Huachun
author_facet Lu, Zhen
Zhou, Xinyi
Fu, Leiwen
Li, Yuwei
Tian, Tian
Liu, Qi
Zou, Huachun
author_sort Lu, Zhen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasingly prevalent and has significantly heterogeneous risks of survival for diagnosed individuals due to the inter-related risk factors. Precise prediction of the risk of survival for an individual patient with OPSCC presents a useful adjunct to therapeutic decision-making regarding the management of OPSCC. The aim of this systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis is to assess prognostic prediction models for OPSCC and lay a foundation for future research programmes to develop and validate prognostic prediction models for OPSCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocol statement. Based on predefined criteria, electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) will be searched for relevant studies without language restrictions from inception of databases to present. This study will systematically review published prognostic prediction models for survival outcomes in patients with OPSCC, describe their characteristics, compare performance and assess risk of bias and real-world clinical utility. Selection of eligible studies, data extraction and critical appraisal will be conducted independently by two reviewers. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Included studies will be systematically summarised using appropriate tools designed for prognostic prediction modelling studies. Risk of bias and quality of studies will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis. Performance measures of these models will be pooled and analysed with meta-analyses if feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will be conducted completely based on published data, so approval from an ethics committee or written consent is not required. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023400272.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10582955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105829552023-10-19 Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis Lu, Zhen Zhou, Xinyi Fu, Leiwen Li, Yuwei Tian, Tian Liu, Qi Zou, Huachun BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasingly prevalent and has significantly heterogeneous risks of survival for diagnosed individuals due to the inter-related risk factors. Precise prediction of the risk of survival for an individual patient with OPSCC presents a useful adjunct to therapeutic decision-making regarding the management of OPSCC. The aim of this systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis is to assess prognostic prediction models for OPSCC and lay a foundation for future research programmes to develop and validate prognostic prediction models for OPSCC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocol statement. Based on predefined criteria, electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) will be searched for relevant studies without language restrictions from inception of databases to present. This study will systematically review published prognostic prediction models for survival outcomes in patients with OPSCC, describe their characteristics, compare performance and assess risk of bias and real-world clinical utility. Selection of eligible studies, data extraction and critical appraisal will be conducted independently by two reviewers. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. Included studies will be systematically summarised using appropriate tools designed for prognostic prediction modelling studies. Risk of bias and quality of studies will be assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis. Performance measures of these models will be pooled and analysed with meta-analyses if feasible. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will be conducted completely based on published data, so approval from an ethics committee or written consent is not required. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023400272. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10582955/ /pubmed/37827742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073375 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Lu, Zhen
Zhou, Xinyi
Fu, Leiwen
Li, Yuwei
Tian, Tian
Liu, Qi
Zou, Huachun
Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
title Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic prediction models for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (opscc): a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37827742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073375
work_keys_str_mv AT luzhen prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT zhouxinyi prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT fuleiwen prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT liyuwei prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT tiantian prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT liuqi prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis
AT zouhuachun prognosticpredictionmodelsfororopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaopsccaprotocolforsystematicreviewcriticalappraisalandmetaanalysis