Cargando…
Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based studies indicate that crisis checklist use improves management of patients with critical conditions in the emergency department (ED). An interview-based study suggests that use of an emergency manual (EM)—a collection of crisis checklists—improves management of clinica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071545 |
_version_ | 1785122477676953600 |
---|---|
author | Dryver, Eric Olsson de Capretz, Pontus Mohammad, Mohammed Armelin, Malin Dupont, William D. Bergenfelz, Anders Ekelund, Ulf |
author_facet | Dryver, Eric Olsson de Capretz, Pontus Mohammad, Mohammed Armelin, Malin Dupont, William D. Bergenfelz, Anders Ekelund, Ulf |
author_sort | Dryver, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based studies indicate that crisis checklist use improves management of patients with critical conditions in the emergency department (ED). An interview-based study suggests that use of an emergency manual (EM)—a collection of crisis checklists—improves management of clinical perioperative crises. There is a need for in-depth prospective studies of EM use during clinical practice, evaluating when and how EMs are used and impact on patient management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 6-month long study prospectively evaluates a digital EM during management of priority 1 patients in the Skåne University Hospital at Lund’s ED. Resuscitation teams are encouraged to use the EM after a management plan has been derived (‘Do-Confirm’). The documenting nurse activates and reads from the EM, and checklists are displayed on a large screen visible to all team members. Whether the EM is activated, and which sections are displayed, are automatically recorded. Interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use are registered by the nurse. Fifty cases featuring such interventions are reviewed by specialists in emergency medicine blinded to whether the interventions were performed prior to or after EM use. All interventions are graded as indicated, of neutral relevance or not indicated. The primary outcome measures are the proportions of interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use graded as indicated, of neutral relevance, and not indicated. A secondary outcome measure is the team’s subjective evaluation of the EM’s value on a Likert scale of 1–6. Team members can report events related to EM use, and information from these events is extracted through structured interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2022-01896-01). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and abstracts submitted to national and international conferences to disseminate our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05649891. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10583077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105830772023-10-19 Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol Dryver, Eric Olsson de Capretz, Pontus Mohammad, Mohammed Armelin, Malin Dupont, William D. Bergenfelz, Anders Ekelund, Ulf BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based studies indicate that crisis checklist use improves management of patients with critical conditions in the emergency department (ED). An interview-based study suggests that use of an emergency manual (EM)—a collection of crisis checklists—improves management of clinical perioperative crises. There is a need for in-depth prospective studies of EM use during clinical practice, evaluating when and how EMs are used and impact on patient management. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 6-month long study prospectively evaluates a digital EM during management of priority 1 patients in the Skåne University Hospital at Lund’s ED. Resuscitation teams are encouraged to use the EM after a management plan has been derived (‘Do-Confirm’). The documenting nurse activates and reads from the EM, and checklists are displayed on a large screen visible to all team members. Whether the EM is activated, and which sections are displayed, are automatically recorded. Interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use are registered by the nurse. Fifty cases featuring such interventions are reviewed by specialists in emergency medicine blinded to whether the interventions were performed prior to or after EM use. All interventions are graded as indicated, of neutral relevance or not indicated. The primary outcome measures are the proportions of interventions performed thanks to Do-Confirm EM use graded as indicated, of neutral relevance, and not indicated. A secondary outcome measure is the team’s subjective evaluation of the EM’s value on a Likert scale of 1–6. Team members can report events related to EM use, and information from these events is extracted through structured interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2022-01896-01). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and abstracts submitted to national and international conferences to disseminate our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05649891. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10583077/ /pubmed/37848292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071545 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Dryver, Eric Olsson de Capretz, Pontus Mohammad, Mohammed Armelin, Malin Dupont, William D. Bergenfelz, Anders Ekelund, Ulf Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
title | Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
title_full | Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
title_fullStr | Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
title_short | Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
title_sort | clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dryvereric clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT olssondecapretzpontus clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT mohammadmohammed clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT armelinmalin clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT dupontwilliamd clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT bergenfelzanders clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol AT ekelundulf clinicaluseofanemergencymanualbyresuscitationteamsandimpactonperformanceintheemergencydepartmentaprospectivemixedmethodsstudyprotocol |