Cargando…
Comparative study of ChatGPT and human evaluators on the assessment of medical literature according to recognised reporting standards
INTRODUCTION: Amid clinicians’ challenges in staying updated with medical research, artificial intelligence (AI) tools like the large language model (LLM) ChatGPT could automate appraisal of research quality, saving time and reducing bias. This study compares the proficiency of ChatGPT3 against huma...
Autores principales: | Roberts, Richard HR, Ali, Stephen R, Hutchings, Hayley A, Dobbs, Thomas D, Whitaker, Iain S |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37827724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100830 |
Ejemplares similares
-
To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT: the use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific papers
por: Marescotti, Manuela
Publicado: (2023) -
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
por: Teebagy, Sean, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
ChatGPT in Clinical Toxicology
por: Sabry Abdel-Messih, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Authorship Policy and ChatGPT
por: Kleebayoon, Amnuay, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
ChatGPT and scientific paper
por: Kleebayoon, Amnuay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)