Cargando…

A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan

INTRODUCTION: Increasing handwashing with soap (HWWS) among older children in emergency settings can have a large public health impact, however, evidence on what works is limited. One promising approach is the ‘Surprise Soap’ intervention in which a novel soap with an embedded toy is delivered to ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Julie, Osman, Ibtihal Mohammed-Elhassan, Amon-Tanoh, Maud, Deola, Claudio, MacDougall, Amy, Cumming, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37827726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012633
_version_ 1785122481700339712
author Watson, Julie
Osman, Ibtihal Mohammed-Elhassan
Amon-Tanoh, Maud
Deola, Claudio
MacDougall, Amy
Cumming, Oliver
author_facet Watson, Julie
Osman, Ibtihal Mohammed-Elhassan
Amon-Tanoh, Maud
Deola, Claudio
MacDougall, Amy
Cumming, Oliver
author_sort Watson, Julie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Increasing handwashing with soap (HWWS) among older children in emergency settings can have a large public health impact, however, evidence on what works is limited. One promising approach is the ‘Surprise Soap’ intervention in which a novel soap with an embedded toy is delivered to children in a short, participatory household session that includes a glitter game and HWWS practice. Here, we evaluate this intervention against a standard intervention in a complex emergency setting. METHODS: A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial was conducted in Naivasha refugee settlement, Sudan. Blinding was not possible. 203 randomly selected households, with at least one child aged 5–12, were randomised to receive the Surprise Soap intervention (n=101) or a standard intervention comprising a short household session with health messaging and plain soap distribution (n=102). The primary outcome was the proportion of prespecified potential HWWS events observed for children aged 5–12, accompanied by HWWS, at baseline, 4, 12 and 16 weeks post intervention delivery. RESULTS: 200 households were included in the analyses: 101 intervention and 99 control. No difference in intervention effectiveness was observed at any follow-up (4 weeks: adjusted rate ratio (RR) 1.2, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.7; 12 weeks: RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.1; 16 weeks: RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.5). However, we observed increased HWWS in both arms at 4 weeks (27 and 23 percentage point increase in the intervention and control arm, respectively) that was sustained at 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We find that the Surprise Soap intervention is no more effective at increasing older children’s HWWS than a standard, household-level, health-based intervention in this complex humanitarian emergency. There appears to be no marginal benefit in terms of HWWS that would justify the additional cost of implementing the Surprise Soap intervention. Further trials that include a passive control arm are needed to determine the independent effects of each intervention and guide future intervention design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10583099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105830992023-10-19 A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan Watson, Julie Osman, Ibtihal Mohammed-Elhassan Amon-Tanoh, Maud Deola, Claudio MacDougall, Amy Cumming, Oliver BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Increasing handwashing with soap (HWWS) among older children in emergency settings can have a large public health impact, however, evidence on what works is limited. One promising approach is the ‘Surprise Soap’ intervention in which a novel soap with an embedded toy is delivered to children in a short, participatory household session that includes a glitter game and HWWS practice. Here, we evaluate this intervention against a standard intervention in a complex emergency setting. METHODS: A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial was conducted in Naivasha refugee settlement, Sudan. Blinding was not possible. 203 randomly selected households, with at least one child aged 5–12, were randomised to receive the Surprise Soap intervention (n=101) or a standard intervention comprising a short household session with health messaging and plain soap distribution (n=102). The primary outcome was the proportion of prespecified potential HWWS events observed for children aged 5–12, accompanied by HWWS, at baseline, 4, 12 and 16 weeks post intervention delivery. RESULTS: 200 households were included in the analyses: 101 intervention and 99 control. No difference in intervention effectiveness was observed at any follow-up (4 weeks: adjusted rate ratio (RR) 1.2, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.7; 12 weeks: RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.1; 16 weeks: RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.5). However, we observed increased HWWS in both arms at 4 weeks (27 and 23 percentage point increase in the intervention and control arm, respectively) that was sustained at 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We find that the Surprise Soap intervention is no more effective at increasing older children’s HWWS than a standard, household-level, health-based intervention in this complex humanitarian emergency. There appears to be no marginal benefit in terms of HWWS that would justify the additional cost of implementing the Surprise Soap intervention. Further trials that include a passive control arm are needed to determine the independent effects of each intervention and guide future intervention design. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10583099/ /pubmed/37827726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012633 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Watson, Julie
Osman, Ibtihal Mohammed-Elhassan
Amon-Tanoh, Maud
Deola, Claudio
MacDougall, Amy
Cumming, Oliver
A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan
title A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan
title_full A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan
title_fullStr A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan
title_full_unstemmed A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan
title_short A cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the Surprise Soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in Sudan
title_sort cluster-randomised controlled equivalence trial of the surprise soap handwashing intervention among older children living in a refugee settlement in sudan
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37827726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012633
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonjulie aclusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT osmanibtihalmohammedelhassan aclusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT amontanohmaud aclusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT deolaclaudio aclusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT macdougallamy aclusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT cummingoliver aclusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT watsonjulie clusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT osmanibtihalmohammedelhassan clusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT amontanohmaud clusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT deolaclaudio clusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT macdougallamy clusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan
AT cummingoliver clusterrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrialofthesurprisesoaphandwashinginterventionamongolderchildrenlivinginarefugeesettlementinsudan