Cargando…
Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
INTRODUCTION: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694 |
_version_ | 1785122483128500224 |
---|---|
author | Baek, Daniel Elman, Alyssa Gottesman, Elaine Shaw, Amy Makaroun, Lena K Stern, Michael E Mulcare, Mary R Sullivan, Michelle Pino, Chloe McAuley, Jennine LoFaso, Veronica M Chang, E-Shien Hancock, David Bloemen, Elizabeth M Tietz, Sarah Lindberg, Daniel M Sharma, Rahul Clark, Sunday Lachs, Mark S Pillemer, Karl Rosen, Tony |
author_facet | Baek, Daniel Elman, Alyssa Gottesman, Elaine Shaw, Amy Makaroun, Lena K Stern, Michael E Mulcare, Mary R Sullivan, Michelle Pino, Chloe McAuley, Jennine LoFaso, Veronica M Chang, E-Shien Hancock, David Bloemen, Elizabeth M Tietz, Sarah Lindberg, Daniel M Sharma, Rahul Clark, Sunday Lachs, Mark S Pillemer, Karl Rosen, Tony |
author_sort | Baek, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a protocol to mitigate these challenges and rigorously evaluate a first-of-its-kind emergency department/hospital-based elder mistreatment intervention, the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used a multistep process to develop an evaluation protocol for VEPT: (1) creation of a logic model to describe programme activities and relevant short-term and long-term outcomes, (2) operationalisation of these outcome measures, (3) development of a combined outcome and (4) design of a protocol using telephone follow-up at multiple time points to obtain information about older adults served by VEPT. This protocol, which is informing an ongoing evaluation of VEPT, may help researchers and health system leaders design evaluations for similar elder mistreatment programmes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project has been reviewed and approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol #20-02021422. We aim to disseminate our results in peer-reviewed journals at national and international conferences and among interested patient groups and the public. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10583105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105831052023-10-19 Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team Baek, Daniel Elman, Alyssa Gottesman, Elaine Shaw, Amy Makaroun, Lena K Stern, Michael E Mulcare, Mary R Sullivan, Michelle Pino, Chloe McAuley, Jennine LoFaso, Veronica M Chang, E-Shien Hancock, David Bloemen, Elizabeth M Tietz, Sarah Lindberg, Daniel M Sharma, Rahul Clark, Sunday Lachs, Mark S Pillemer, Karl Rosen, Tony BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a protocol to mitigate these challenges and rigorously evaluate a first-of-its-kind emergency department/hospital-based elder mistreatment intervention, the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used a multistep process to develop an evaluation protocol for VEPT: (1) creation of a logic model to describe programme activities and relevant short-term and long-term outcomes, (2) operationalisation of these outcome measures, (3) development of a combined outcome and (4) design of a protocol using telephone follow-up at multiple time points to obtain information about older adults served by VEPT. This protocol, which is informing an ongoing evaluation of VEPT, may help researchers and health system leaders design evaluations for similar elder mistreatment programmes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project has been reviewed and approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol #20-02021422. We aim to disseminate our results in peer-reviewed journals at national and international conferences and among interested patient groups and the public. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10583105/ /pubmed/37832983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Medicine Baek, Daniel Elman, Alyssa Gottesman, Elaine Shaw, Amy Makaroun, Lena K Stern, Michael E Mulcare, Mary R Sullivan, Michelle Pino, Chloe McAuley, Jennine LoFaso, Veronica M Chang, E-Shien Hancock, David Bloemen, Elizabeth M Tietz, Sarah Lindberg, Daniel M Sharma, Rahul Clark, Sunday Lachs, Mark S Pillemer, Karl Rosen, Tony Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team |
title | Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team |
title_full | Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team |
title_fullStr | Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team |
title_short | Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team |
title_sort | initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: protocol for evaluating the vulnerable elder protection team |
topic | Geriatric Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baekdaniel initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT elmanalyssa initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT gottesmanelaine initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT shawamy initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT makarounlenak initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT sternmichaele initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT mulcaremaryr initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT sullivanmichelle initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT pinochloe initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT mcauleyjennine initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT lofasoveronicam initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT changeshien initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT hancockdavid initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT bloemenelizabethm initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT tietzsarah initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT lindbergdanielm initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT sharmarahul initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT clarksunday initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT lachsmarks initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT pillemerkarl initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam AT rosentony initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam |