Cargando…

Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team

INTRODUCTION: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baek, Daniel, Elman, Alyssa, Gottesman, Elaine, Shaw, Amy, Makaroun, Lena K, Stern, Michael E, Mulcare, Mary R, Sullivan, Michelle, Pino, Chloe, McAuley, Jennine, LoFaso, Veronica M, Chang, E-Shien, Hancock, David, Bloemen, Elizabeth M, Tietz, Sarah, Lindberg, Daniel M, Sharma, Rahul, Clark, Sunday, Lachs, Mark S, Pillemer, Karl, Rosen, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694
_version_ 1785122483128500224
author Baek, Daniel
Elman, Alyssa
Gottesman, Elaine
Shaw, Amy
Makaroun, Lena K
Stern, Michael E
Mulcare, Mary R
Sullivan, Michelle
Pino, Chloe
McAuley, Jennine
LoFaso, Veronica M
Chang, E-Shien
Hancock, David
Bloemen, Elizabeth M
Tietz, Sarah
Lindberg, Daniel M
Sharma, Rahul
Clark, Sunday
Lachs, Mark S
Pillemer, Karl
Rosen, Tony
author_facet Baek, Daniel
Elman, Alyssa
Gottesman, Elaine
Shaw, Amy
Makaroun, Lena K
Stern, Michael E
Mulcare, Mary R
Sullivan, Michelle
Pino, Chloe
McAuley, Jennine
LoFaso, Veronica M
Chang, E-Shien
Hancock, David
Bloemen, Elizabeth M
Tietz, Sarah
Lindberg, Daniel M
Sharma, Rahul
Clark, Sunday
Lachs, Mark S
Pillemer, Karl
Rosen, Tony
author_sort Baek, Daniel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a protocol to mitigate these challenges and rigorously evaluate a first-of-its-kind emergency department/hospital-based elder mistreatment intervention, the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used a multistep process to develop an evaluation protocol for VEPT: (1) creation of a logic model to describe programme activities and relevant short-term and long-term outcomes, (2) operationalisation of these outcome measures, (3) development of a combined outcome and (4) design of a protocol using telephone follow-up at multiple time points to obtain information about older adults served by VEPT. This protocol, which is informing an ongoing evaluation of VEPT, may help researchers and health system leaders design evaluations for similar elder mistreatment programmes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project has been reviewed and approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol #20-02021422. We aim to disseminate our results in peer-reviewed journals at national and international conferences and among interested patient groups and the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10583105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105831052023-10-19 Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team Baek, Daniel Elman, Alyssa Gottesman, Elaine Shaw, Amy Makaroun, Lena K Stern, Michael E Mulcare, Mary R Sullivan, Michelle Pino, Chloe McAuley, Jennine LoFaso, Veronica M Chang, E-Shien Hancock, David Bloemen, Elizabeth M Tietz, Sarah Lindberg, Daniel M Sharma, Rahul Clark, Sunday Lachs, Mark S Pillemer, Karl Rosen, Tony BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Although many programmes have been developed to address elder mistreatment, high-quality, rigorous evaluations to assess their impact are lacking. This is partly due to challenges in conducting programme evaluation for such a complex phenomenon. We describe here the development of a protocol to mitigate these challenges and rigorously evaluate a first-of-its-kind emergency department/hospital-based elder mistreatment intervention, the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used a multistep process to develop an evaluation protocol for VEPT: (1) creation of a logic model to describe programme activities and relevant short-term and long-term outcomes, (2) operationalisation of these outcome measures, (3) development of a combined outcome and (4) design of a protocol using telephone follow-up at multiple time points to obtain information about older adults served by VEPT. This protocol, which is informing an ongoing evaluation of VEPT, may help researchers and health system leaders design evaluations for similar elder mistreatment programmes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project has been reviewed and approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board, protocol #20-02021422. We aim to disseminate our results in peer-reviewed journals at national and international conferences and among interested patient groups and the public. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10583105/ /pubmed/37832983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Baek, Daniel
Elman, Alyssa
Gottesman, Elaine
Shaw, Amy
Makaroun, Lena K
Stern, Michael E
Mulcare, Mary R
Sullivan, Michelle
Pino, Chloe
McAuley, Jennine
LoFaso, Veronica M
Chang, E-Shien
Hancock, David
Bloemen, Elizabeth M
Tietz, Sarah
Lindberg, Daniel M
Sharma, Rahul
Clark, Sunday
Lachs, Mark S
Pillemer, Karl
Rosen, Tony
Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
title Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
title_full Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
title_fullStr Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
title_full_unstemmed Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
title_short Initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: Protocol for evaluating the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team
title_sort initial steps in addressing the challenges of elder mistreatment evaluation: protocol for evaluating the vulnerable elder protection team
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071694
work_keys_str_mv AT baekdaniel initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT elmanalyssa initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT gottesmanelaine initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT shawamy initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT makarounlenak initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT sternmichaele initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT mulcaremaryr initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT sullivanmichelle initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT pinochloe initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT mcauleyjennine initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT lofasoveronicam initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT changeshien initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT hancockdavid initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT bloemenelizabethm initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT tietzsarah initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT lindbergdanielm initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT sharmarahul initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT clarksunday initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT lachsmarks initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT pillemerkarl initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam
AT rosentony initialstepsinaddressingthechallengesofeldermistreatmentevaluationprotocolforevaluatingthevulnerableelderprotectionteam