Cargando…

Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting

Background Patient mortality reviews identify care, system, and process deficiencies. Patient deaths undergo quarterly review in our academic emergency department (ED), whereas in other departments, mortality reviews are requested by the pronouncing physician within 24 hours. In the ED, individual p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobson, Nancy, Miller, Abigail, Mackman, Sean A, Bhatnagar, Anshul, Aranda, Jamie, Chinn, Matthew, Otero, Ronny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37859929
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45472
_version_ 1785122487047028736
author Jacobson, Nancy
Miller, Abigail
Mackman, Sean A
Bhatnagar, Anshul
Aranda, Jamie
Chinn, Matthew
Otero, Ronny
author_facet Jacobson, Nancy
Miller, Abigail
Mackman, Sean A
Bhatnagar, Anshul
Aranda, Jamie
Chinn, Matthew
Otero, Ronny
author_sort Jacobson, Nancy
collection PubMed
description Background Patient mortality reviews identify care, system, and process deficiencies. Patient deaths undergo quarterly review in our academic emergency department (ED), whereas in other departments, mortality reviews are requested by the pronouncing physician within 24 hours. In the ED, individual physicians encounter barriers to 24-hour reviews, including feasibility, the perception of futility, re-exposure to traumatic events, and a high frequency of pre-hospital and non-preventable deaths. This quality review aimed to determine the preventable death rate, contributing factors to ED patient mortality, cases requiring further review, and the capture rate of individual case submissions into the patient safety reporting system. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all patient deaths occurring in our ED from July 2019 to February 2020. All patients 18 years or older who were pronounced dead in the ED during our data collection period were included. Patients declared deceased pre-hospital, on an inpatient floor, or in the operating room were excluded. Deaths were assessed for characteristics such as sex, presence of a pulse upon arrival, diagnostics and interventions performed, and whether the cause of death was traumatic or medical. Deaths were categorized on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not preventable" to "likely preventable." The presence or absence of contributing factors and the need for further review were recorded. Results Of the 166 reviewed cases, 87% (n=144) were non-preventable due to a terminal condition upon arrival, 12% (n=20) were non-preventable despite maximal efforts, 0.6% (n=1) were non-preventable despite a medical or systems error, and 0.6% (n=1) were possibly preventable due to a medical or systems error. No cases were definitively preventable. Only 1.2% (n=2) of cases required further safety review. In 55% (n=91) of cases, the patient arrived without a pulse. Medical deaths (60%, n=100) outnumbered traumatic deaths (39%, n=64). The most utilized diagnostic test was ultrasound (67%, n=111), and the most utilized intervention was advanced cardiac life support (59%, n=98). Conclusion There is a high prevalence of unpreventable deaths in the ED (99%, n=164). Only two cases (1.2%) were identified for further patient safety review. Standard safety event reporting practices correctly identified all possibly preventable ED deaths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10583127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105831272023-10-19 Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting Jacobson, Nancy Miller, Abigail Mackman, Sean A Bhatnagar, Anshul Aranda, Jamie Chinn, Matthew Otero, Ronny Cureus Emergency Medicine Background Patient mortality reviews identify care, system, and process deficiencies. Patient deaths undergo quarterly review in our academic emergency department (ED), whereas in other departments, mortality reviews are requested by the pronouncing physician within 24 hours. In the ED, individual physicians encounter barriers to 24-hour reviews, including feasibility, the perception of futility, re-exposure to traumatic events, and a high frequency of pre-hospital and non-preventable deaths. This quality review aimed to determine the preventable death rate, contributing factors to ED patient mortality, cases requiring further review, and the capture rate of individual case submissions into the patient safety reporting system. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all patient deaths occurring in our ED from July 2019 to February 2020. All patients 18 years or older who were pronounced dead in the ED during our data collection period were included. Patients declared deceased pre-hospital, on an inpatient floor, or in the operating room were excluded. Deaths were assessed for characteristics such as sex, presence of a pulse upon arrival, diagnostics and interventions performed, and whether the cause of death was traumatic or medical. Deaths were categorized on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not preventable" to "likely preventable." The presence or absence of contributing factors and the need for further review were recorded. Results Of the 166 reviewed cases, 87% (n=144) were non-preventable due to a terminal condition upon arrival, 12% (n=20) were non-preventable despite maximal efforts, 0.6% (n=1) were non-preventable despite a medical or systems error, and 0.6% (n=1) were possibly preventable due to a medical or systems error. No cases were definitively preventable. Only 1.2% (n=2) of cases required further safety review. In 55% (n=91) of cases, the patient arrived without a pulse. Medical deaths (60%, n=100) outnumbered traumatic deaths (39%, n=64). The most utilized diagnostic test was ultrasound (67%, n=111), and the most utilized intervention was advanced cardiac life support (59%, n=98). Conclusion There is a high prevalence of unpreventable deaths in the ED (99%, n=164). Only two cases (1.2%) were identified for further patient safety review. Standard safety event reporting practices correctly identified all possibly preventable ED deaths. Cureus 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10583127/ /pubmed/37859929 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45472 Text en Copyright © 2023, Jacobson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Jacobson, Nancy
Miller, Abigail
Mackman, Sean A
Bhatnagar, Anshul
Aranda, Jamie
Chinn, Matthew
Otero, Ronny
Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting
title Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting
title_full Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting
title_fullStr Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting
title_full_unstemmed Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting
title_short Mortality in the Emergency Department and the Effectiveness of Conventional Safety Event Reporting
title_sort mortality in the emergency department and the effectiveness of conventional safety event reporting
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37859929
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45472
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsonnancy mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting
AT millerabigail mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting
AT mackmanseana mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting
AT bhatnagaranshul mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting
AT arandajamie mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting
AT chinnmatthew mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting
AT oteroronny mortalityintheemergencydepartmentandtheeffectivenessofconventionalsafetyeventreporting