Cargando…
Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM)
BACKGROUND: Trust in government is associated with health behaviours and is an important consideration in population health interventions. While there is a reported decline in public trust in government across OECD countries, the tools used to measure trust are limited in their use for informing act...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0 |
_version_ | 1785122540674351104 |
---|---|
author | Burns, Kathleen E. Brown, Patrick Calnan, Michael Ward, Paul R. Little, Jerrica Betini, Gustavo S. Perlman, Christopher M. Nascimento, Helena Godinho Meyer, Samantha B. |
author_facet | Burns, Kathleen E. Brown, Patrick Calnan, Michael Ward, Paul R. Little, Jerrica Betini, Gustavo S. Perlman, Christopher M. Nascimento, Helena Godinho Meyer, Samantha B. |
author_sort | Burns, Kathleen E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trust in government is associated with health behaviours and is an important consideration in population health interventions. While there is a reported decline in public trust in government across OECD countries, the tools used to measure trust are limited in their use for informing action to (re)build trust, and have limitations related to reliability and validity. To address the limitations of existing measures available to track public trust, the aim of the present work was to develop a new measure of trust in government. METHODS: Fifty-six qualitative interviews (Aug-Oct 2021; oversampling for equity-deserving populations) were conducted to design a national survey, including factor analyses and validation testing (N = 878; June 1-14th 2022) in Canada. RESULTS: The measure demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.96) and test validity (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.09, SRMR = 0.03), suggesting that trust in government can be measured as a single underlying construct. It also demonstrated strong criterion validity, as measured by significant (p < 0.0001) associations of scores with vaccine hesitancy, vaccine conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in public health messaging about COVID-19, and trust in public health advice about COVID-19. We present the Trust in Government Measure (TGM); a 13-item unidimensional measure of trust in Federal government. CONCLUSIONS: This measure can be used within high-income countries, particularly member countries within the OECD already in support of using tools to collect, publish and compare statistics. Our measure should be used by researchers and policy makers to measure trust in government as a key indicator of societal and public health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10583387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105833872023-10-19 Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) Burns, Kathleen E. Brown, Patrick Calnan, Michael Ward, Paul R. Little, Jerrica Betini, Gustavo S. Perlman, Christopher M. Nascimento, Helena Godinho Meyer, Samantha B. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Trust in government is associated with health behaviours and is an important consideration in population health interventions. While there is a reported decline in public trust in government across OECD countries, the tools used to measure trust are limited in their use for informing action to (re)build trust, and have limitations related to reliability and validity. To address the limitations of existing measures available to track public trust, the aim of the present work was to develop a new measure of trust in government. METHODS: Fifty-six qualitative interviews (Aug-Oct 2021; oversampling for equity-deserving populations) were conducted to design a national survey, including factor analyses and validation testing (N = 878; June 1-14th 2022) in Canada. RESULTS: The measure demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.96) and test validity (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.09, SRMR = 0.03), suggesting that trust in government can be measured as a single underlying construct. It also demonstrated strong criterion validity, as measured by significant (p < 0.0001) associations of scores with vaccine hesitancy, vaccine conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in public health messaging about COVID-19, and trust in public health advice about COVID-19. We present the Trust in Government Measure (TGM); a 13-item unidimensional measure of trust in Federal government. CONCLUSIONS: This measure can be used within high-income countries, particularly member countries within the OECD already in support of using tools to collect, publish and compare statistics. Our measure should be used by researchers and policy makers to measure trust in government as a key indicator of societal and public health. BioMed Central 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10583387/ /pubmed/37848848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Burns, Kathleen E. Brown, Patrick Calnan, Michael Ward, Paul R. Little, Jerrica Betini, Gustavo S. Perlman, Christopher M. Nascimento, Helena Godinho Meyer, Samantha B. Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) |
title | Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) |
title_full | Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) |
title_short | Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM) |
title_sort | development and validation of the trust in government measure (tgm) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37848848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burnskathleene developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT brownpatrick developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT calnanmichael developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT wardpaulr developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT littlejerrica developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT betinigustavos developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT perlmanchristopherm developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT nascimentohelenagodinho developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm AT meyersamanthab developmentandvalidationofthetrustingovernmentmeasuretgm |