Cargando…

Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?

Bacterial persistence to antibiotics defines the ability of small sub-populations of sensitive cells within an isogenic population to survive high doses of bactericidal antibiotics. Here, we investigated the importance of the five main envelope stress responses (ESRs) of Escherichia coli in persiste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousseau, Clothilde J., Fraikin, Nathan, Zedek, Safia, Van Melderen, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37787525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00329-23
_version_ 1785122602867490816
author Rousseau, Clothilde J.
Fraikin, Nathan
Zedek, Safia
Van Melderen, Laurence
author_facet Rousseau, Clothilde J.
Fraikin, Nathan
Zedek, Safia
Van Melderen, Laurence
author_sort Rousseau, Clothilde J.
collection PubMed
description Bacterial persistence to antibiotics defines the ability of small sub-populations of sensitive cells within an isogenic population to survive high doses of bactericidal antibiotics. Here, we investigated the importance of the five main envelope stress responses (ESRs) of Escherichia coli in persistence to five bactericidal β-lactam antibiotics by combining classical time-kill curve experiments and single-cell analysis using time-lapse microscopy. We showed that the survival frequency of mutants for the Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs systems treated with different β-lactams is comparable to that of the wild-type strain, indicating that these ESRs do not play a direct role in persistence to β-lactams. Since the σ(E)-encoding gene is essential, we could not directly test its role. Using fluorescent reporters to monitor the activation of ESRs, we observed that σ(E) is induced by high doses of meropenem. However, the dynamics of σ(E) activation during meropenem treatment did not reveal any difference in persister cells compared to the bulk of the population, indicating that σ(E) activation is not a hallmark of persistence. The Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs responses were neither induced by ampicillin nor by meropenem. However, pre-induction of the Rcs system by polymyxin B increased survival to meropenem in an Rcs-dependent manner, suggesting that this ESR might confer some yet uncharacterized advantages during meropenem treatment or at the post-antibiotic recovery step. Altogether, our data suggest that ESRs are not key actors in E. coli persistence to β-lactams in the conditions we tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10583663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105836632023-10-19 Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli? Rousseau, Clothilde J. Fraikin, Nathan Zedek, Safia Van Melderen, Laurence Antimicrob Agents Chemother Mechanisms of Action: Physiological Effects Bacterial persistence to antibiotics defines the ability of small sub-populations of sensitive cells within an isogenic population to survive high doses of bactericidal antibiotics. Here, we investigated the importance of the five main envelope stress responses (ESRs) of Escherichia coli in persistence to five bactericidal β-lactam antibiotics by combining classical time-kill curve experiments and single-cell analysis using time-lapse microscopy. We showed that the survival frequency of mutants for the Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs systems treated with different β-lactams is comparable to that of the wild-type strain, indicating that these ESRs do not play a direct role in persistence to β-lactams. Since the σ(E)-encoding gene is essential, we could not directly test its role. Using fluorescent reporters to monitor the activation of ESRs, we observed that σ(E) is induced by high doses of meropenem. However, the dynamics of σ(E) activation during meropenem treatment did not reveal any difference in persister cells compared to the bulk of the population, indicating that σ(E) activation is not a hallmark of persistence. The Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs responses were neither induced by ampicillin nor by meropenem. However, pre-induction of the Rcs system by polymyxin B increased survival to meropenem in an Rcs-dependent manner, suggesting that this ESR might confer some yet uncharacterized advantages during meropenem treatment or at the post-antibiotic recovery step. Altogether, our data suggest that ESRs are not key actors in E. coli persistence to β-lactams in the conditions we tested. American Society for Microbiology 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10583663/ /pubmed/37787525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00329-23 Text en Copyright © 2023 Rousseau et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mechanisms of Action: Physiological Effects
Rousseau, Clothilde J.
Fraikin, Nathan
Zedek, Safia
Van Melderen, Laurence
Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?
title Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?
title_full Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?
title_fullStr Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?
title_full_unstemmed Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?
title_short Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?
title_sort are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in escherichia coli?
topic Mechanisms of Action: Physiological Effects
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37787525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00329-23
work_keys_str_mv AT rousseauclothildej areenvelopestressresponsesessentialforpersistencetoblactamsinescherichiacoli
AT fraikinnathan areenvelopestressresponsesessentialforpersistencetoblactamsinescherichiacoli
AT zedeksafia areenvelopestressresponsesessentialforpersistencetoblactamsinescherichiacoli
AT vanmelderenlaurence areenvelopestressresponsesessentialforpersistencetoblactamsinescherichiacoli