Cargando…

Prognostic impact of fluorescent lymphography on gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Fluorescent lymphography-guided lymphadenectomy (FL) for gastric cancer is gaining popularity. However, its impact on prognosis is not known. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of FL in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 5678...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sung Hyun, Kim, Ki-Yoon, Cho, Minah, Kim, Yoo Min, Kim, Hyoung-Il, Hyung, Woo Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000572
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Fluorescent lymphography-guided lymphadenectomy (FL) for gastric cancer is gaining popularity. However, its impact on prognosis is not known. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of FL in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 5678 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy from 2013 to 2017. The survival was compared between the FLFL group and the conventional lymphadenectomy (non-FL group) using 1:1 propensity score matching after exclusion. Patients in the FL group underwent gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy after endoscopic peritumoral injection of indocyanine green the day before surgery. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the FL and non-FL groups each had 1064 patients with similar demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. All matched variables had a standardized mean difference under 0.1. The FL group showed a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (56.2±20.1) than the non-FL group (46.2±18.2, P<0.001). The FL group also had more stage III patients (P=0.044) than the non-FL group. The FL group demonstrated higher overall survival (P=0.038) and relapse-free survival (P=0.036) in stage III compared with the non-FL group. However, no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival were observed between the two groups for stages I (P=0.420 and P=0.120, respectively) and II (P=0.200 and P=0.280, respectively). CONCLUSION: FL demonstrated a higher survival in stage III gastric cancer patients by the more accurate staging resulting from larger lymph node retrieval. Thus, given its potential to improve prognostication by enhancing staging accuracy, it is recommended as an option to consider the use of FL in clinical practice.