Cargando…
Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study
BACKGROUND: Given the limited access to breast cancer (BC) screening, the authors developed and validated a mobile phone-artificial intelligence-based infrared thermography (AI-IRT) system for BC screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This large prospective clinical trial assessed the diagnostic performa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37678284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000594 |
_version_ | 1785122655906562048 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xuefei Chou, Kuanyu Zhang, Guochao Zuo, Zhichao Zhang, Ting Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Shen, Songjie Zhang, Xiaohui Wang, Xuejing Zhong, Ying Qin, Xue Guo, Hailin Wang, Xiaojie Xiao, Yao Yi, Qianchuan Yan, Cunli Liu, Jian Li, Dongdong Liu, Wei Liu, Mengwen Ma, Xiaoying Tao, Jiangtao Sun, Qiang Zhai, Jidong Huang, Likun |
author_facet | Wang, Xuefei Chou, Kuanyu Zhang, Guochao Zuo, Zhichao Zhang, Ting Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Shen, Songjie Zhang, Xiaohui Wang, Xuejing Zhong, Ying Qin, Xue Guo, Hailin Wang, Xiaojie Xiao, Yao Yi, Qianchuan Yan, Cunli Liu, Jian Li, Dongdong Liu, Wei Liu, Mengwen Ma, Xiaoying Tao, Jiangtao Sun, Qiang Zhai, Jidong Huang, Likun |
author_sort | Wang, Xuefei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Given the limited access to breast cancer (BC) screening, the authors developed and validated a mobile phone-artificial intelligence-based infrared thermography (AI-IRT) system for BC screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This large prospective clinical trial assessed the diagnostic performance of the AI-IRT system. The authors constructed two datasets and two models, performed internal and external validation, and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the AI models and clinicians. Dataset A included 2100 patients recruited from 19 medical centres in nine regions of China. Dataset B was used for independent external validation and included 102 patients recruited from Langfang People’s Hospital. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the binary model for identifying low-risk and intermediate/high-risk patients was 0.9487 (95% CI: 0.9231–0.9744) internally and 0.9120 (95% CI: 0.8460–0.9790) externally. The accuracy of the binary model was higher than that of human readers (0.8627 vs. 0.8088, respectively). In addition, the binary model was better than the multinomial model and used different diagnostic thresholds based on BC risk to achieve specific goals. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of AI-IRT was high across populations with different demographic characteristics and less reliant on manual interpretations, demonstrating that this model can improve pre-clinical screening and increase screening rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10583949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105839492023-10-19 Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study Wang, Xuefei Chou, Kuanyu Zhang, Guochao Zuo, Zhichao Zhang, Ting Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Shen, Songjie Zhang, Xiaohui Wang, Xuejing Zhong, Ying Qin, Xue Guo, Hailin Wang, Xiaojie Xiao, Yao Yi, Qianchuan Yan, Cunli Liu, Jian Li, Dongdong Liu, Wei Liu, Mengwen Ma, Xiaoying Tao, Jiangtao Sun, Qiang Zhai, Jidong Huang, Likun Int J Surg Original Research BACKGROUND: Given the limited access to breast cancer (BC) screening, the authors developed and validated a mobile phone-artificial intelligence-based infrared thermography (AI-IRT) system for BC screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This large prospective clinical trial assessed the diagnostic performance of the AI-IRT system. The authors constructed two datasets and two models, performed internal and external validation, and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the AI models and clinicians. Dataset A included 2100 patients recruited from 19 medical centres in nine regions of China. Dataset B was used for independent external validation and included 102 patients recruited from Langfang People’s Hospital. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the binary model for identifying low-risk and intermediate/high-risk patients was 0.9487 (95% CI: 0.9231–0.9744) internally and 0.9120 (95% CI: 0.8460–0.9790) externally. The accuracy of the binary model was higher than that of human readers (0.8627 vs. 0.8088, respectively). In addition, the binary model was better than the multinomial model and used different diagnostic thresholds based on BC risk to achieve specific goals. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of AI-IRT was high across populations with different demographic characteristics and less reliant on manual interpretations, demonstrating that this model can improve pre-clinical screening and increase screening rates. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10583949/ /pubmed/37678284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000594 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wang, Xuefei Chou, Kuanyu Zhang, Guochao Zuo, Zhichao Zhang, Ting Zhou, Yidong Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Shen, Songjie Zhang, Xiaohui Wang, Xuejing Zhong, Ying Qin, Xue Guo, Hailin Wang, Xiaojie Xiao, Yao Yi, Qianchuan Yan, Cunli Liu, Jian Li, Dongdong Liu, Wei Liu, Mengwen Ma, Xiaoying Tao, Jiangtao Sun, Qiang Zhai, Jidong Huang, Likun Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
title | Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
title_full | Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
title_fullStr | Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
title_short | Breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
title_sort | breast cancer pre-clinical screening using infrared thermography and artificial intelligence: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37678284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxuefei breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT choukuanyu breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zhangguochao breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zuozhichao breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zhangting breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zhouyidong breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT maofeng breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT linyan breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT shensongjie breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zhangxiaohui breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT wangxuejing breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zhongying breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT qinxue breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT guohailin breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT wangxiaojie breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT xiaoyao breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT yiqianchuan breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT yancunli breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT liujian breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT lidongdong breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT liuwei breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT liumengwen breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT maxiaoying breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT taojiangtao breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT sunqiang breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT zhaijidong breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy AT huanglikun breastcancerpreclinicalscreeningusinginfraredthermographyandartificialintelligenceaprospectivemulticentrediagnosticaccuracycohortstudy |