Cargando…

Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes

Electrochemical reduction of CO(2) presents an attractive way to store renewable energy in chemical bonds in a potentially carbon-neutral way. However, the available electrolyzers suffer from intrinsic problems, like flooding and salt accumulation, that must be overcome to industrialize the technolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iglesias van Montfort, Hugo-Pieter, Li, Mengran, Irtem, Erdem, Abdinejad, Maryam, Wu, Yuming, Pal, Santosh K., Sassenburg, Mark, Ripepi, Davide, Subramanian, Siddhartha, Biemolt, Jasper, Rufford, Thomas E., Burdyny, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37852966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42348-6
_version_ 1785122854367395840
author Iglesias van Montfort, Hugo-Pieter
Li, Mengran
Irtem, Erdem
Abdinejad, Maryam
Wu, Yuming
Pal, Santosh K.
Sassenburg, Mark
Ripepi, Davide
Subramanian, Siddhartha
Biemolt, Jasper
Rufford, Thomas E.
Burdyny, Thomas
author_facet Iglesias van Montfort, Hugo-Pieter
Li, Mengran
Irtem, Erdem
Abdinejad, Maryam
Wu, Yuming
Pal, Santosh K.
Sassenburg, Mark
Ripepi, Davide
Subramanian, Siddhartha
Biemolt, Jasper
Rufford, Thomas E.
Burdyny, Thomas
author_sort Iglesias van Montfort, Hugo-Pieter
collection PubMed
description Electrochemical reduction of CO(2) presents an attractive way to store renewable energy in chemical bonds in a potentially carbon-neutral way. However, the available electrolyzers suffer from intrinsic problems, like flooding and salt accumulation, that must be overcome to industrialize the technology. To mitigate flooding and salt precipitation issues, researchers have used super-hydrophobic electrodes based on either expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) gas-diffusion layers (GDL’s), or carbon-based GDL’s with added PTFE. While the PTFE backbone is highly resistant to flooding, the non-conductive nature of PTFE means that without additional current collection the catalyst layer itself is responsible for electron-dispersion, which penalizes system efficiency and stability. In this work, we present operando results that illustrate that the current distribution and electrical potential distribution is far from a uniform distribution in thin catalyst layers (~50 nm) deposited onto ePTFE GDL’s. We then compare the effects of thicker catalyst layers (~500 nm) and a newly developed non-invasive current collector (NICC). The NICC can maintain more uniform current distributions with 10-fold thinner catalyst layers while improving stability towards ethylene (≥ 30%) by approximately two-fold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10584973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105849732023-10-20 Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes Iglesias van Montfort, Hugo-Pieter Li, Mengran Irtem, Erdem Abdinejad, Maryam Wu, Yuming Pal, Santosh K. Sassenburg, Mark Ripepi, Davide Subramanian, Siddhartha Biemolt, Jasper Rufford, Thomas E. Burdyny, Thomas Nat Commun Article Electrochemical reduction of CO(2) presents an attractive way to store renewable energy in chemical bonds in a potentially carbon-neutral way. However, the available electrolyzers suffer from intrinsic problems, like flooding and salt accumulation, that must be overcome to industrialize the technology. To mitigate flooding and salt precipitation issues, researchers have used super-hydrophobic electrodes based on either expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) gas-diffusion layers (GDL’s), or carbon-based GDL’s with added PTFE. While the PTFE backbone is highly resistant to flooding, the non-conductive nature of PTFE means that without additional current collection the catalyst layer itself is responsible for electron-dispersion, which penalizes system efficiency and stability. In this work, we present operando results that illustrate that the current distribution and electrical potential distribution is far from a uniform distribution in thin catalyst layers (~50 nm) deposited onto ePTFE GDL’s. We then compare the effects of thicker catalyst layers (~500 nm) and a newly developed non-invasive current collector (NICC). The NICC can maintain more uniform current distributions with 10-fold thinner catalyst layers while improving stability towards ethylene (≥ 30%) by approximately two-fold. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10584973/ /pubmed/37852966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42348-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Iglesias van Montfort, Hugo-Pieter
Li, Mengran
Irtem, Erdem
Abdinejad, Maryam
Wu, Yuming
Pal, Santosh K.
Sassenburg, Mark
Ripepi, Davide
Subramanian, Siddhartha
Biemolt, Jasper
Rufford, Thomas E.
Burdyny, Thomas
Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
title Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
title_full Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
title_fullStr Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
title_short Non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during CO(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
title_sort non-invasive current collectors for improved current-density distribution during co(2) electrolysis on super-hydrophobic electrodes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37852966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42348-6
work_keys_str_mv AT iglesiasvanmontforthugopieter noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT limengran noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT irtemerdem noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT abdinejadmaryam noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT wuyuming noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT palsantoshk noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT sassenburgmark noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT ripepidavide noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT subramaniansiddhartha noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT biemoltjasper noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT ruffordthomase noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes
AT burdynythomas noninvasivecurrentcollectorsforimprovedcurrentdensitydistributionduringco2electrolysisonsuperhydrophobicelectrodes