Cargando…
Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Upper limb motor recovery is one of the important goals of stroke rehabilitation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a new type of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is considered a potential therapy. However, there is still no consensus on the efficacy of iTB...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1259872 |
_version_ | 1785122865188700160 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Zhiqing Liu, Tianhao Liu, Ying Han, Kaiyue Su, Wenlong Zhao, Jingdu Chi, Qianqian Zhang, Xiaonian Zhang, Hao |
author_facet | Tang, Zhiqing Liu, Tianhao Liu, Ying Han, Kaiyue Su, Wenlong Zhao, Jingdu Chi, Qianqian Zhang, Xiaonian Zhang, Hao |
author_sort | Tang, Zhiqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Upper limb motor recovery is one of the important goals of stroke rehabilitation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a new type of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is considered a potential therapy. However, there is still no consensus on the efficacy of iTBS for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke. Stimulus dose may be an important factor affecting the efficacy of iTBS. Therefore, we aim to investigate and compare the effects and neural mechanisms of three doses of iTBS on upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients, and our hypothesis is that the higher the dose of iTBS, the greater the improvement in upper limb motor function. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will recruit 56 stroke patients with upper limb motor dysfunction. All participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 21 sessions of 600 pulses active iTBS, 1,200 pulses active iTBS, 1,800 pulses active iTBS, or 1,800 pulses sham iTBS in addition to conventional rehabilitation training. The primary outcome is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score from baseline to end of intervention, and the secondary outcomes are the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Grip Strength (GS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). The FMA-UE, MBI, and SIS are assessed pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at the 3-weeks follow-up. The WMFT, GS, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data will be obtained pre- and post-treatment. DISCUSSION: The iTBS intervention in this study protocol is expected to be a potential method to promote upper limb motor recovery after stroke, and the results may provide supportive evidence for the optimal dose of iTBS intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10585036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105850362023-10-20 Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Tang, Zhiqing Liu, Tianhao Liu, Ying Han, Kaiyue Su, Wenlong Zhao, Jingdu Chi, Qianqian Zhang, Xiaonian Zhang, Hao Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Upper limb motor recovery is one of the important goals of stroke rehabilitation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a new type of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is considered a potential therapy. However, there is still no consensus on the efficacy of iTBS for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke. Stimulus dose may be an important factor affecting the efficacy of iTBS. Therefore, we aim to investigate and compare the effects and neural mechanisms of three doses of iTBS on upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients, and our hypothesis is that the higher the dose of iTBS, the greater the improvement in upper limb motor function. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will recruit 56 stroke patients with upper limb motor dysfunction. All participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 21 sessions of 600 pulses active iTBS, 1,200 pulses active iTBS, 1,800 pulses active iTBS, or 1,800 pulses sham iTBS in addition to conventional rehabilitation training. The primary outcome is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score from baseline to end of intervention, and the secondary outcomes are the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Grip Strength (GS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). The FMA-UE, MBI, and SIS are assessed pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at the 3-weeks follow-up. The WMFT, GS, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data will be obtained pre- and post-treatment. DISCUSSION: The iTBS intervention in this study protocol is expected to be a potential method to promote upper limb motor recovery after stroke, and the results may provide supportive evidence for the optimal dose of iTBS intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10585036/ /pubmed/37869516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1259872 Text en Copyright © 2023 Tang, Liu, Liu, Han, Su, Zhao, Chi, Zhang and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Tang, Zhiqing Liu, Tianhao Liu, Ying Han, Kaiyue Su, Wenlong Zhao, Jingdu Chi, Qianqian Zhang, Xiaonian Zhang, Hao Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1259872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangzhiqing differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liutianhao differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuying differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hankaiyue differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suwenlong differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhaojingdu differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chiqianqian differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangxiaonian differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhanghao differentdosesofintermittentthetaburststimulationforupperlimbmotordysfunctionafterstrokeastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |