Cargando…

Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers

The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A., Kerchner, Geoffrey A., Dhadda, Shobha, Garcia, Miguel, Miller, David S., Natanegara, Fanni, Raket, Lars Lau, Robieson, Weining, Siemers, Eric R., Carrillo, Maria C., Weber, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37867532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421
_version_ 1785122886999080960
author Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A.
Kerchner, Geoffrey A.
Dhadda, Shobha
Garcia, Miguel
Miller, David S.
Natanegara, Fanni
Raket, Lars Lau
Robieson, Weining
Siemers, Eric R.
Carrillo, Maria C.
Weber, Christopher J.
author_facet Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A.
Kerchner, Geoffrey A.
Dhadda, Shobha
Garcia, Miguel
Miller, David S.
Natanegara, Fanni
Raket, Lars Lau
Robieson, Weining
Siemers, Eric R.
Carrillo, Maria C.
Weber, Christopher J.
author_sort Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A.
collection PubMed
description The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in AD contributes to the challenges inherent in demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit of any potential new AD therapy. The failure of many large and expensive clinical trials to date has prompted a focus on optimizing all aspects of decision making, to not only expedite the development of new treatments, but also maximize the value of the information that each clinical trial yields, so that all future clinical trials (including those that are negative) will contribute toward advancing the field. To address this important topic the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened December 1–2, 2020. The goals focused around identifying new directions and actionable steps to enhance clinical trial decision making in planned future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10585126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105851262023-10-20 Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A. Kerchner, Geoffrey A. Dhadda, Shobha Garcia, Miguel Miller, David S. Natanegara, Fanni Raket, Lars Lau Robieson, Weining Siemers, Eric R. Carrillo, Maria C. Weber, Christopher J. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Perspective The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in AD contributes to the challenges inherent in demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit of any potential new AD therapy. The failure of many large and expensive clinical trials to date has prompted a focus on optimizing all aspects of decision making, to not only expedite the development of new treatments, but also maximize the value of the information that each clinical trial yields, so that all future clinical trials (including those that are negative) will contribute toward advancing the field. To address this important topic the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened December 1–2, 2020. The goals focused around identifying new directions and actionable steps to enhance clinical trial decision making in planned future studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10585126/ /pubmed/37867532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Perspective
Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A.
Kerchner, Geoffrey A.
Dhadda, Shobha
Garcia, Miguel
Miller, David S.
Natanegara, Fanni
Raket, Lars Lau
Robieson, Weining
Siemers, Eric R.
Carrillo, Maria C.
Weber, Christopher J.
Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
title Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
title_full Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
title_fullStr Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
title_short Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
title_sort decision making in clinical trials: interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37867532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421
work_keys_str_mv AT welshbohmerkathleena decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT kerchnergeoffreya decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT dhaddashobha decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT garciamiguel decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT millerdavids decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT natanegarafanni decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT raketlarslau decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT robiesonweining decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT siemersericr decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT carrillomariac decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers
AT weberchristopherj decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers