Cargando…
Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers
The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37867532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421 |
_version_ | 1785122886999080960 |
---|---|
author | Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A. Kerchner, Geoffrey A. Dhadda, Shobha Garcia, Miguel Miller, David S. Natanegara, Fanni Raket, Lars Lau Robieson, Weining Siemers, Eric R. Carrillo, Maria C. Weber, Christopher J. |
author_facet | Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A. Kerchner, Geoffrey A. Dhadda, Shobha Garcia, Miguel Miller, David S. Natanegara, Fanni Raket, Lars Lau Robieson, Weining Siemers, Eric R. Carrillo, Maria C. Weber, Christopher J. |
author_sort | Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in AD contributes to the challenges inherent in demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit of any potential new AD therapy. The failure of many large and expensive clinical trials to date has prompted a focus on optimizing all aspects of decision making, to not only expedite the development of new treatments, but also maximize the value of the information that each clinical trial yields, so that all future clinical trials (including those that are negative) will contribute toward advancing the field. To address this important topic the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened December 1–2, 2020. The goals focused around identifying new directions and actionable steps to enhance clinical trial decision making in planned future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10585126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105851262023-10-20 Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A. Kerchner, Geoffrey A. Dhadda, Shobha Garcia, Miguel Miller, David S. Natanegara, Fanni Raket, Lars Lau Robieson, Weining Siemers, Eric R. Carrillo, Maria C. Weber, Christopher J. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Perspective The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease‐modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in AD contributes to the challenges inherent in demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit of any potential new AD therapy. The failure of many large and expensive clinical trials to date has prompted a focus on optimizing all aspects of decision making, to not only expedite the development of new treatments, but also maximize the value of the information that each clinical trial yields, so that all future clinical trials (including those that are negative) will contribute toward advancing the field. To address this important topic the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened December 1–2, 2020. The goals focused around identifying new directions and actionable steps to enhance clinical trial decision making in planned future studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10585126/ /pubmed/37867532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A. Kerchner, Geoffrey A. Dhadda, Shobha Garcia, Miguel Miller, David S. Natanegara, Fanni Raket, Lars Lau Robieson, Weining Siemers, Eric R. Carrillo, Maria C. Weber, Christopher J. Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
title | Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
title_full | Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
title_short | Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
title_sort | decision making in clinical trials: interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37867532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT welshbohmerkathleena decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT kerchnergeoffreya decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT dhaddashobha decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT garciamiguel decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT millerdavids decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT natanegarafanni decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT raketlarslau decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT robiesonweining decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT siemersericr decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT carrillomariac decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers AT weberchristopherj decisionmakinginclinicaltrialsinterimanalysesinnovativedesignandbiomarkers |