Cargando…

Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of utilizing the small number of remaining vitrified oocytes after the failure of adequate fresh sibling oocytes. The outcome of present study would provide more comprehensive information about possible benefits or disadvantage to cryopreserve supe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Xiao, Zhang, Yiting, Gao, Shuli, Gao, Shuzhe, Zhang, Meng, Gao, Shanshan, Ma, Jinlong, Chen, Zi-Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37867517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1221308
_version_ 1785122889601646592
author Fu, Xiao
Zhang, Yiting
Gao, Shuli
Gao, Shuzhe
Zhang, Meng
Gao, Shanshan
Ma, Jinlong
Chen, Zi-Jiang
author_facet Fu, Xiao
Zhang, Yiting
Gao, Shuli
Gao, Shuzhe
Zhang, Meng
Gao, Shanshan
Ma, Jinlong
Chen, Zi-Jiang
author_sort Fu, Xiao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of utilizing the small number of remaining vitrified oocytes after the failure of adequate fresh sibling oocytes. The outcome of present study would provide more comprehensive information about possible benefits or disadvantage to cryopreserve supernumerary oocytes for patients who have plenty oocytes retrieved. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 791 IVF/ICSI cycles using 6344 oocytes that had been vitrified in the Reproductive Hospital affiliated to Shandong University between January 2013 and December 2019.They were divided into three groups: SOC group (supernumerary oocytes cryopreservation), relative-MOC group (relative male factor-oocyte cryopreservation), and absolute-MOC group (absolute male factor-oocyte cryopreservation). Laboratory and clinical outcomes were analysed, and multivariate regression analysis was used to study the effect of different indications of vitrification on CLBR. RESULTS: The CLBR was highest in absolute-MOC, and lowest in SOC (39.0% vs 28.9%, P=0.006); however, after adjusting for confounding factors, the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariable regression analysis showed no impact of indications of vitrified oocytes on CLBR according to controlled age, BMI, preservation duration, use of donor sperm or not, use of PESA/TESA or not, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes thawed, and oocyte survival rate. The preliminary data of safety showed no significant differences in the perinatal and neonatal outcoms after ET and FET between the SOC and MOC groups. CONCLUSION: Different indications of vitrification did not affect CLBR. The CLBR of vitrified oocytes for different indications was correlated with age and number of warmed oocytes. For women who have plenty oocytes retrieved, the strategy of cryopreserving a small number of oocytes is a valuable option and might benefit them in the future. Additional data from autologous oocyte vitrification research employing a large-scale and variable-controlled methodology with extending follow-up will complement and clarify the current results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10585140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105851402023-10-20 Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles Fu, Xiao Zhang, Yiting Gao, Shuli Gao, Shuzhe Zhang, Meng Gao, Shanshan Ma, Jinlong Chen, Zi-Jiang Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of utilizing the small number of remaining vitrified oocytes after the failure of adequate fresh sibling oocytes. The outcome of present study would provide more comprehensive information about possible benefits or disadvantage to cryopreserve supernumerary oocytes for patients who have plenty oocytes retrieved. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 791 IVF/ICSI cycles using 6344 oocytes that had been vitrified in the Reproductive Hospital affiliated to Shandong University between January 2013 and December 2019.They were divided into three groups: SOC group (supernumerary oocytes cryopreservation), relative-MOC group (relative male factor-oocyte cryopreservation), and absolute-MOC group (absolute male factor-oocyte cryopreservation). Laboratory and clinical outcomes were analysed, and multivariate regression analysis was used to study the effect of different indications of vitrification on CLBR. RESULTS: The CLBR was highest in absolute-MOC, and lowest in SOC (39.0% vs 28.9%, P=0.006); however, after adjusting for confounding factors, the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariable regression analysis showed no impact of indications of vitrified oocytes on CLBR according to controlled age, BMI, preservation duration, use of donor sperm or not, use of PESA/TESA or not, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes thawed, and oocyte survival rate. The preliminary data of safety showed no significant differences in the perinatal and neonatal outcoms after ET and FET between the SOC and MOC groups. CONCLUSION: Different indications of vitrification did not affect CLBR. The CLBR of vitrified oocytes for different indications was correlated with age and number of warmed oocytes. For women who have plenty oocytes retrieved, the strategy of cryopreserving a small number of oocytes is a valuable option and might benefit them in the future. Additional data from autologous oocyte vitrification research employing a large-scale and variable-controlled methodology with extending follow-up will complement and clarify the current results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10585140/ /pubmed/37867517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1221308 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fu, Zhang, Gao, Gao, Zhang, Gao, Ma and Chen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Fu, Xiao
Zhang, Yiting
Gao, Shuli
Gao, Shuzhe
Zhang, Meng
Gao, Shanshan
Ma, Jinlong
Chen, Zi-Jiang
Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles
title Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles
title_full Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles
title_fullStr Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles
title_short Efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in IVF/ICSI cycles
title_sort efficiency and safety of vitrification of surplus oocytes following superovulation: a comparison of different clinical indications of oocyte cryopreservation in ivf/icsi cycles
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37867517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1221308
work_keys_str_mv AT fuxiao efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT zhangyiting efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT gaoshuli efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT gaoshuzhe efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT zhangmeng efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT gaoshanshan efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT majinlong efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles
AT chenzijiang efficiencyandsafetyofvitrificationofsurplusoocytesfollowingsuperovulationacomparisonofdifferentclinicalindicationsofoocytecryopreservationinivficsicycles