Cargando…
Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality, comparing it with CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P). Additionally, the study sought to identify subgroups, evaluate the time trend in treatment effects, and analyze patient cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad289 |
_version_ | 1785122938102480896 |
---|---|
author | Veres, Boglárka Fehérvári, Péter Engh, Marie Anne Hegyi, Péter Gharehdaghi, Sara Zima, Endre Duray, Gábor Merkely, Béla Kosztin, Annamária |
author_facet | Veres, Boglárka Fehérvári, Péter Engh, Marie Anne Hegyi, Péter Gharehdaghi, Sara Zima, Endre Duray, Gábor Merkely, Béla Kosztin, Annamária |
author_sort | Veres, Boglárka |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality, comparing it with CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P). Additionally, the study sought to identify subgroups, evaluate the time trend in treatment effects, and analyze patient characteristics, considering the changing indications over the past decades. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase up to October 2021 were screened for studies comparing CRT-P and CRT-D, focusing on mortality. Altogether 26 observational studies were selected comprising 128 030 CRT patients, including 55 469 with CRT-P and 72 561 with CRT-D device. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator was able to reduce all-cause mortality by almost 20% over CRT-P [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76–0.94; P < 0.01] even in propensity-matched studies (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.80–0.87; P < 0.001) but not in those with non-ischaemic aetiology (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.79–1.15; P = 0.19) or over 75 years (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 0.96–1.21; P = 0.17). When treatment effect on mortality was investigated by the median year of inclusion, there was a difference between studies released before 2015 and those thereafter. Time-trend effects could be also observed in patients’ characteristics: CRT-P candidates were getting older and the prevalence of ischaemic aetiology was increasing over time. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review of observational studies, mostly retrospective with meta-analysis, suggest that patients with CRT-D had a lower risk of mortality compared with CRT-P. However, subgroups could be identified, where CRT-D was not superior such as non-ischaemic and older patients. An improved treatment effect of CRT-D on mortality could be observed between the early and late studies partly related to the changed characteristics of CRT candidates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10585357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105853572023-10-20 Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis Veres, Boglárka Fehérvári, Péter Engh, Marie Anne Hegyi, Péter Gharehdaghi, Sara Zima, Endre Duray, Gábor Merkely, Béla Kosztin, Annamária Europace Meta-Analysis AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality, comparing it with CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P). Additionally, the study sought to identify subgroups, evaluate the time trend in treatment effects, and analyze patient characteristics, considering the changing indications over the past decades. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase up to October 2021 were screened for studies comparing CRT-P and CRT-D, focusing on mortality. Altogether 26 observational studies were selected comprising 128 030 CRT patients, including 55 469 with CRT-P and 72 561 with CRT-D device. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator was able to reduce all-cause mortality by almost 20% over CRT-P [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76–0.94; P < 0.01] even in propensity-matched studies (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.80–0.87; P < 0.001) but not in those with non-ischaemic aetiology (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.79–1.15; P = 0.19) or over 75 years (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 0.96–1.21; P = 0.17). When treatment effect on mortality was investigated by the median year of inclusion, there was a difference between studies released before 2015 and those thereafter. Time-trend effects could be also observed in patients’ characteristics: CRT-P candidates were getting older and the prevalence of ischaemic aetiology was increasing over time. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review of observational studies, mostly retrospective with meta-analysis, suggest that patients with CRT-D had a lower risk of mortality compared with CRT-P. However, subgroups could be identified, where CRT-D was not superior such as non-ischaemic and older patients. An improved treatment effect of CRT-D on mortality could be observed between the early and late studies partly related to the changed characteristics of CRT candidates. Oxford University Press 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10585357/ /pubmed/37766466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad289 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Veres, Boglárka Fehérvári, Péter Engh, Marie Anne Hegyi, Péter Gharehdaghi, Sara Zima, Endre Duray, Gábor Merkely, Béla Kosztin, Annamária Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veresboglarka timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fehervaripeter timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT enghmarieanne timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hegyipeter timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gharehdaghisara timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zimaendre timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duraygabor timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT merkelybela timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kosztinannamaria timetrendtreatmenteffectofcardiacresynchronizationtherapywithorwithoutdefibrillatoronmortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |