Cargando…

Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles

Functional trait approaches are common in ecology, but a lack of clear hypotheses on how traits relate to environmental gradients (i.e., trait–niche relationships) often makes uncovering mechanisms difficult. Furthermore, measures of community functional structure differ in their implications, yet i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burner, Ryan C., Stephan, Jörg G., Drag, Lukas, Potterf, Mária, Birkemoe, Tone, Siitonen, Juha, Müller, Jörg, Ovaskainen, Otso, Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne, Snäll, Tord
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10588
_version_ 1785122957145669632
author Burner, Ryan C.
Stephan, Jörg G.
Drag, Lukas
Potterf, Mária
Birkemoe, Tone
Siitonen, Juha
Müller, Jörg
Ovaskainen, Otso
Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne
Snäll, Tord
author_facet Burner, Ryan C.
Stephan, Jörg G.
Drag, Lukas
Potterf, Mária
Birkemoe, Tone
Siitonen, Juha
Müller, Jörg
Ovaskainen, Otso
Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne
Snäll, Tord
author_sort Burner, Ryan C.
collection PubMed
description Functional trait approaches are common in ecology, but a lack of clear hypotheses on how traits relate to environmental gradients (i.e., trait–niche relationships) often makes uncovering mechanisms difficult. Furthermore, measures of community functional structure differ in their implications, yet inferences are seldom compared among metrics. Community‐weighted mean trait values (CWMs), a common measure, are largely driven by the most common species and thus do not reflect community‐wide trait–niche relationships per se. Alternatively, trait–niche relationships can be estimated across a larger group of species using hierarchical joint species distribution models (JSDMs), quantified by a parameter Γ. We investigated how inferences about trait–niche relationships are affected by the choice of metric. Using deadwood‐dependent (saproxylic) beetles in fragmented Finnish forests, we followed a protocol for investigating trait–niche relationships by (1) identifying environmental filters (climate, forest age, and deadwood volume), (2) relating these to an ecological function (dispersal ability), and (3) identifying traits related to this function (wing morphology). We tested 18 hypothesized dispersal relationships using both CWM and Γ estimates across these environmental gradients. CWMs were more likely than Γ to show support for trait–niche relationships. Up to 13% of species' realized niches were explained by dispersal traits, but the directions of effects were consistent with fewer than 11%–39% of our 18 trait–niche hypotheses (depending on the metric used). This highlights the difficulty in connecting morphological traits and ecological functions in insects, despite the clear conceptual link between landscape connectivity and flight‐related traits. Caution is thus warranted in hypothesis development, particularly where apparent trait–function links are less clear. Inferences differ when CWMs versus Γ estimates are used, necessitating the choice of a metric that reflects study questions. CWMs help explain the effects of environmental gradients on community trait composition, whereas the effects of traits on species' niches are better estimated using hierarchical JSDMs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10585442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105854422023-10-20 Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles Burner, Ryan C. Stephan, Jörg G. Drag, Lukas Potterf, Mária Birkemoe, Tone Siitonen, Juha Müller, Jörg Ovaskainen, Otso Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne Snäll, Tord Ecol Evol Research Articles Functional trait approaches are common in ecology, but a lack of clear hypotheses on how traits relate to environmental gradients (i.e., trait–niche relationships) often makes uncovering mechanisms difficult. Furthermore, measures of community functional structure differ in their implications, yet inferences are seldom compared among metrics. Community‐weighted mean trait values (CWMs), a common measure, are largely driven by the most common species and thus do not reflect community‐wide trait–niche relationships per se. Alternatively, trait–niche relationships can be estimated across a larger group of species using hierarchical joint species distribution models (JSDMs), quantified by a parameter Γ. We investigated how inferences about trait–niche relationships are affected by the choice of metric. Using deadwood‐dependent (saproxylic) beetles in fragmented Finnish forests, we followed a protocol for investigating trait–niche relationships by (1) identifying environmental filters (climate, forest age, and deadwood volume), (2) relating these to an ecological function (dispersal ability), and (3) identifying traits related to this function (wing morphology). We tested 18 hypothesized dispersal relationships using both CWM and Γ estimates across these environmental gradients. CWMs were more likely than Γ to show support for trait–niche relationships. Up to 13% of species' realized niches were explained by dispersal traits, but the directions of effects were consistent with fewer than 11%–39% of our 18 trait–niche hypotheses (depending on the metric used). This highlights the difficulty in connecting morphological traits and ecological functions in insects, despite the clear conceptual link between landscape connectivity and flight‐related traits. Caution is thus warranted in hypothesis development, particularly where apparent trait–function links are less clear. Inferences differ when CWMs versus Γ estimates are used, necessitating the choice of a metric that reflects study questions. CWMs help explain the effects of environmental gradients on community trait composition, whereas the effects of traits on species' niches are better estimated using hierarchical JSDMs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10585442/ /pubmed/37869428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10588 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Burner, Ryan C.
Stephan, Jörg G.
Drag, Lukas
Potterf, Mária
Birkemoe, Tone
Siitonen, Juha
Müller, Jörg
Ovaskainen, Otso
Sverdrup‐Thygeson, Anne
Snäll, Tord
Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
title Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
title_full Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
title_fullStr Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
title_full_unstemmed Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
title_short Alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: A test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
title_sort alternative measures of trait–niche relationships: a test on dispersal traits in saproxylic beetles
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10588
work_keys_str_mv AT burnerryanc alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT stephanjorgg alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT draglukas alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT potterfmaria alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT birkemoetone alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT siitonenjuha alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT mullerjorg alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT ovaskainenotso alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT sverdrupthygesonanne alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles
AT snalltord alternativemeasuresoftraitnicherelationshipsatestondispersaltraitsinsaproxylicbeetles