Cargando…

Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging

BACKGROUND: Neovascularity visualization in breast nodules is challenging due to the limitations of conventional Doppler imaging methods. This study aims to assess the performance of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in evaluating the microvascularity of breast nodules (diameter ≤2 cm). The compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiuwen, Cheng, Fangyuan, Song, Xingjun, Wang, Peng, Tian, Shuangyan, Zhao, Xiaopei, Wang, Qing, Zhang, Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869333
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-136
_version_ 1785122965127430144
author Zhang, Xiuwen
Cheng, Fangyuan
Song, Xingjun
Wang, Peng
Tian, Shuangyan
Zhao, Xiaopei
Wang, Qing
Zhang, Mei
author_facet Zhang, Xiuwen
Cheng, Fangyuan
Song, Xingjun
Wang, Peng
Tian, Shuangyan
Zhao, Xiaopei
Wang, Qing
Zhang, Mei
author_sort Zhang, Xiuwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neovascularity visualization in breast nodules is challenging due to the limitations of conventional Doppler imaging methods. This study aims to assess the performance of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in evaluating the microvascularity of breast nodules (diameter ≤2 cm). The comparison of performances of SMI with color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and power Doppler imaging (PDI) was made by using a three-factor scoring system of vascularity. This study also investigated the common features of microvascularity in small malignant nodules on SMI for early differentiating from benign nodules. METHODS: Ninety-one female patients (with 125 breast nodules) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All the breast nodules were examined by grayscale ultrasonography (US), CDFI, PDI, and SMI. The number, morphologic features, and distribution of blood vessels were scored to evaluate the nodular vascularity in light of the three-factor scoring system. The diagnostic value of SMI for microvascularity in breast nodules was analyzed and compared with CDFI and PDI. RESULTS: Histological analysis showed 53 malignant and 72 benign nodules. The vascularity grades detected by SMI were significantly different from those of CDFI and PDI (P<0.05). SMI detected 47 grade-IV nodules of the total 125 nodules (37.6%), which was more than those detected by CDFI (10.4%, 13/125) and PDI (12.8%, 16/125), while more grade-I nodules were detected by CDFI (42.4%, 53/125) and PDI (36.8%, 46/125) compared with SMI (21.6%, 27/125). Differences in the vessel number, morphologic features, and distribution between benign and malignant breast nodules were significant on SMI (P<0.05). The vessel number ≥6, penetrating vessels, and a mixed distribution of vessels in peripheral and central nodular tissues were the common features of microvascularity in the grade-IV malignant nodules on SMI, whereas the blood vessels in the benign nodules were straight and branching and peripherally distributed. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with CDFI and PDI, SMI enhances microvascularity detection, depicts the microvascular architecture in breast nodules and has potential in the differential diagnosis of malignant nodules from benign nodules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10585493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105854932023-10-20 Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging Zhang, Xiuwen Cheng, Fangyuan Song, Xingjun Wang, Peng Tian, Shuangyan Zhao, Xiaopei Wang, Qing Zhang, Mei Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Neovascularity visualization in breast nodules is challenging due to the limitations of conventional Doppler imaging methods. This study aims to assess the performance of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in evaluating the microvascularity of breast nodules (diameter ≤2 cm). The comparison of performances of SMI with color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and power Doppler imaging (PDI) was made by using a three-factor scoring system of vascularity. This study also investigated the common features of microvascularity in small malignant nodules on SMI for early differentiating from benign nodules. METHODS: Ninety-one female patients (with 125 breast nodules) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All the breast nodules were examined by grayscale ultrasonography (US), CDFI, PDI, and SMI. The number, morphologic features, and distribution of blood vessels were scored to evaluate the nodular vascularity in light of the three-factor scoring system. The diagnostic value of SMI for microvascularity in breast nodules was analyzed and compared with CDFI and PDI. RESULTS: Histological analysis showed 53 malignant and 72 benign nodules. The vascularity grades detected by SMI were significantly different from those of CDFI and PDI (P<0.05). SMI detected 47 grade-IV nodules of the total 125 nodules (37.6%), which was more than those detected by CDFI (10.4%, 13/125) and PDI (12.8%, 16/125), while more grade-I nodules were detected by CDFI (42.4%, 53/125) and PDI (36.8%, 46/125) compared with SMI (21.6%, 27/125). Differences in the vessel number, morphologic features, and distribution between benign and malignant breast nodules were significant on SMI (P<0.05). The vessel number ≥6, penetrating vessels, and a mixed distribution of vessels in peripheral and central nodular tissues were the common features of microvascularity in the grade-IV malignant nodules on SMI, whereas the blood vessels in the benign nodules were straight and branching and peripherally distributed. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with CDFI and PDI, SMI enhances microvascularity detection, depicts the microvascular architecture in breast nodules and has potential in the differential diagnosis of malignant nodules from benign nodules. AME Publishing Company 2023-09-22 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10585493/ /pubmed/37869333 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-136 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Xiuwen
Cheng, Fangyuan
Song, Xingjun
Wang, Peng
Tian, Shuangyan
Zhao, Xiaopei
Wang, Qing
Zhang, Mei
Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging
title Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging
title_full Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging
title_fullStr Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging
title_full_unstemmed Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging
title_short Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging
title_sort superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional doppler imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869333
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-136
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiuwen superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT chengfangyuan superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT songxingjun superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT wangpeng superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT tianshuangyan superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT zhaoxiaopei superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT wangqing superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging
AT zhangmei superbmicrovascularimagingforevaluationofmicrovascularityinbreastnodulescomparedwithconventionaldopplerimaging