Cargando…

Detecting advanced liver fibrosis using ultrasound shear wave velocity measurement in the general population

BACKGROUND: Advanced fibrosis detection in the general population is an unmet need. Additionally, screening method for advanced fibrosis in the general population is not established. Thus, this study aimed to examine the use of shear wave measurement (SWM), which measures liver stiffness by ultrasou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirino, Sakura, Tamaki, Nobuharu, Kurosaki, Masayuki, Takahashi, Yuka, Higuchi, Mayu, Itakura, Yoshie, Tanaka, Yuki, Inada, Kento, Ishido, Shun, Yamashita, Koji, Nobusawa, Tsubasa, Matsumoto, Hiroaki, Hayakawa, Yuka, Kakegawa, Tatsuya, Takaura, Kenta, Tanaka, Shohei, Maeyashiki, Chiaki, Kaneko, Shun, Yasui, Yutaka, Tsuchiya, Kaoru, Nakanishi, Hiroyuki, Okamoto, Ryuichi, Izumi, Namiki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869309
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-511
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Advanced fibrosis detection in the general population is an unmet need. Additionally, screening method for advanced fibrosis in the general population is not established. Thus, this study aimed to examine the use of shear wave measurement (SWM), which measures liver stiffness by ultrasound elastography as a screening tool for advanced fibrosis in health checkups that represents the general population. METHODS: SWM was performed in all subjects. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) was performed in those with SWM shear wave velocity (Vs) ≥1.3 m/s to determinate advanced fibrosis. The diagnostic accuracy of SWM Vs for advanced fibrosis (determined by MRE of ≥3.62 kPa) was examined. This prospective study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network clinical trial registry (UMIN000041609). RESULTS: A total of 2,233 subjects were included. SWM Vs of 1.64 m/s was selected as the best threshold for advanced fibrosis. Using the threshold of SWM Vs at ≥1.64 m/s, subjects were narrowed down to 1.7%, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for advanced fibrosis were 53.3%, 92.4%, 47.1%, and 94.0%, respectively, among these subjects. The multivariable analysis, after adjusting the age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and alcohol use, revealed an SWM Vs of ≥1.64 m/s as the significant factor for advanced fibrosis with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 14.5 (3.4–62; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SWM has high diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis (PPV 47.1%) and may be used as a screening tool for liver fibrosis in the general population.