Cargando…
Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics
BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies on the prognostic factors of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction (LVNC), the determinants are varied and not entirely consistent. This study aimed to build predictive models using radiomics features and machine learning to predict major adverse cardi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869344 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-372 |
_version_ | 1785122978017574912 |
---|---|
author | Han, Pei-Lun Jiang, Ze-Kun Gu, Ran Huang, Shan Jiang, Yu Yang, Zhi-Gang Li, Kang |
author_facet | Han, Pei-Lun Jiang, Ze-Kun Gu, Ran Huang, Shan Jiang, Yu Yang, Zhi-Gang Li, Kang |
author_sort | Han, Pei-Lun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies on the prognostic factors of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction (LVNC), the determinants are varied and not entirely consistent. This study aimed to build predictive models using radiomics features and machine learning to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with LVNC. METHODS: In total, 96 patients with LVNC were included and randomly divided into training and test cohorts. A total of 105 cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived radiomics features and 35 clinical characteristics were extracted. Five different oversampling algorithms were compared for selection of the optimal imbalanced processing. Feature importance was assessed with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). We compared the performance of 5 machine learning classification methods with different sample:feature ratios to determine the optimal hybrid classification strategy. Subsequently, radiomics, clinical, and combined radiomics-clinical models were developed and compared. RESULTS: The machine learning pipeline included an adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) algorithm for imbalanced processing, XGBoost feature selection with a sample:feature ratio of 10, and support vector machine (SVM) modeling. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the radiomics model, clinical model, and combined model in the validation cohort were 0.87 (sensitivity 83.33%, specificity 64.29%), 0.65 (sensitivity 16.67%, specificity 78.57%), and 0.92 (specificity 33.33%, sensitivity 100.00%), respectively. The radiomics model performed similarly to the clinical and combined models (P=0.124 and P=0.621, respectively). The performance of the combined model was significantly better than that of the clinical model (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning-based cine CMR radiomics model performed well at predicting MACEs in patients with LVNC. Adding radiomics features offered incremental prognostic value over clinical factors alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10585548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105855482023-10-20 Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics Han, Pei-Lun Jiang, Ze-Kun Gu, Ran Huang, Shan Jiang, Yu Yang, Zhi-Gang Li, Kang Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Although there are many studies on the prognostic factors of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction (LVNC), the determinants are varied and not entirely consistent. This study aimed to build predictive models using radiomics features and machine learning to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with LVNC. METHODS: In total, 96 patients with LVNC were included and randomly divided into training and test cohorts. A total of 105 cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived radiomics features and 35 clinical characteristics were extracted. Five different oversampling algorithms were compared for selection of the optimal imbalanced processing. Feature importance was assessed with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). We compared the performance of 5 machine learning classification methods with different sample:feature ratios to determine the optimal hybrid classification strategy. Subsequently, radiomics, clinical, and combined radiomics-clinical models were developed and compared. RESULTS: The machine learning pipeline included an adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) algorithm for imbalanced processing, XGBoost feature selection with a sample:feature ratio of 10, and support vector machine (SVM) modeling. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of the radiomics model, clinical model, and combined model in the validation cohort were 0.87 (sensitivity 83.33%, specificity 64.29%), 0.65 (sensitivity 16.67%, specificity 78.57%), and 0.92 (specificity 33.33%, sensitivity 100.00%), respectively. The radiomics model performed similarly to the clinical and combined models (P=0.124 and P=0.621, respectively). The performance of the combined model was significantly better than that of the clinical model (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning-based cine CMR radiomics model performed well at predicting MACEs in patients with LVNC. Adding radiomics features offered incremental prognostic value over clinical factors alone. AME Publishing Company 2023-08-23 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10585548/ /pubmed/37869344 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-372 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Han, Pei-Lun Jiang, Ze-Kun Gu, Ran Huang, Shan Jiang, Yu Yang, Zhi-Gang Li, Kang Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
title | Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
title_full | Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
title_fullStr | Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
title_short | Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
title_sort | prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869344 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanpeilun prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics AT jiangzekun prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics AT guran prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics AT huangshan prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics AT jiangyu prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics AT yangzhigang prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics AT likang prognosticpredictionofleftventricularmyocardialnoncompactionusingmachinelearningandcardiacmagneticresonanceradiomics |