Feasibility and acceptability of an online mental health intervention for pregnant women and their partners: a mixed method study with a pilot randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Untreated perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) have short- and long-term health and social consequences; online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions can reduce symptoms. Despite partner support being protective online interventions rarely target couples. This study builds on research on an existing CBT-based intervention, the Mothers and Babies Online Course (eMB), by testing its feasibility with prenatal couples. METHODS: We conducted a pilot, randomized, controlled feasibility trial using a 1:1 parallel design. To be eligible, participant dyads were pregnant people (between 13–30 weeks gestation and with a score of 10 or greater on either the GAD-7 or PHQ-9 scale indicating elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression) and their cohabitating partners, living in Missouri, with access to the internet; both in the dyad consented to participate. Recruitment occurred via Facebook ads, flyers, and a snowball approach. The intervention group received eMB, and the control group received a list of community resources. We examined retention and adherence data extracted from eMB analytics and study databases. All participants were given depression and anxiety scales at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks to test preliminary efficacy; satisfaction and acceptability were measured at trial end (i.e., eight weeks) and via interview. RESULTS: There were 441 people who responded to recruitment materials, 74 pregnant people were screened; 19 partners did not complete enrolment, and 25 dyads were ineligible. There were 15 dyads per group (N = 30) who enrolled; all completed the study. The survey response rate was 90% but partners required nearly twice the number of reminders. No participant completed all lessons. Mean depression and anxiety scores dropped over time for dyads in control (M = -1.99, -1.53) and intervention (M = -4.80, -1.99). Intervention pregnant people’s anxiety significantly decreased (M = -4.05; 95% CI [0.82, 7.27]) at time two compared to control. Twelve pregnant people and four partners participated in post-intervention interviews and suggested improvements for eMB. CONCLUSION: Online dyadic interventions can potentially reduce PMAD symptoms. However, to feasibly study eMB with couples, strategies to increase program adherence are necessary. Tailoring interventions to overtly include partners may be advantageous. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05867680, 19/05/2023.