Cargando…

Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway

BACKGROUND: Systematic analysis of compensation claims following patient injuries is helpful in improving patient safety. The objective of the current study was to assess compensation claims after arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff ruptures, impingement, and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthriti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lian, Ola Midtsaether, Randsborg, Per-Henrik, Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn, Khan Bukholm, Ida Rashida, Aae, Tommy Frøseth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00378-5
_version_ 1785123018453811200
author Lian, Ola Midtsaether
Randsborg, Per-Henrik
Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn
Khan Bukholm, Ida Rashida
Aae, Tommy Frøseth
author_facet Lian, Ola Midtsaether
Randsborg, Per-Henrik
Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn
Khan Bukholm, Ida Rashida
Aae, Tommy Frøseth
author_sort Lian, Ola Midtsaether
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic analysis of compensation claims following patient injuries is helpful in improving patient safety. The objective of the current study was to assess compensation claims after arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff ruptures, impingement, and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis reported to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and evaluate if there was regional variation on the risk of patient injuries leading to an accepted compensation claim. METHODS: Data from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) from 2008 to 2018 were collected. Demographics (age and sex) and type of claim and reasons for accepted claims were obtained from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation, while the number of arthroscopic procedures was collected from NPR. The treating institutions were grouped on geography according to Norway’s four regional Health Trusts and private institutions and the effect of geography on the probability of an accepted claim was estimated. RESULTS: NPR registered 69,097 shoulder arthroscopies during the study period, of which 216 (0.3%) compensation claims were filed for patient injury. A total of 38% of the claims were accepted, representing 0.1% of the arthroscopic procedures. Infection (37.8%) was the most common reason for accepted claim, followed by no surgical indication (15.9%) and wrong surgical technique (12.2%). We found a statistically significantly increased odds ratio for a claim being accepted in both the smallest and largest regional Health Trusts compared to the other regional Health Trusts and private institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Compensation claims due to patient injury following shoulder arthroscopy are rare (0.3% of patients file a claim, of which a third is accepted (0.1% of all shoulder arthroscopy patients)). The most common reason for accepted claim was infection followed by lack of indication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10585783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105857832023-10-20 Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway Lian, Ola Midtsaether Randsborg, Per-Henrik Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn Khan Bukholm, Ida Rashida Aae, Tommy Frøseth Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Systematic analysis of compensation claims following patient injuries is helpful in improving patient safety. The objective of the current study was to assess compensation claims after arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff ruptures, impingement, and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis reported to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and evaluate if there was regional variation on the risk of patient injuries leading to an accepted compensation claim. METHODS: Data from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation and the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) from 2008 to 2018 were collected. Demographics (age and sex) and type of claim and reasons for accepted claims were obtained from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation, while the number of arthroscopic procedures was collected from NPR. The treating institutions were grouped on geography according to Norway’s four regional Health Trusts and private institutions and the effect of geography on the probability of an accepted claim was estimated. RESULTS: NPR registered 69,097 shoulder arthroscopies during the study period, of which 216 (0.3%) compensation claims were filed for patient injury. A total of 38% of the claims were accepted, representing 0.1% of the arthroscopic procedures. Infection (37.8%) was the most common reason for accepted claim, followed by no surgical indication (15.9%) and wrong surgical technique (12.2%). We found a statistically significantly increased odds ratio for a claim being accepted in both the smallest and largest regional Health Trusts compared to the other regional Health Trusts and private institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Compensation claims due to patient injury following shoulder arthroscopy are rare (0.3% of patients file a claim, of which a third is accepted (0.1% of all shoulder arthroscopy patients)). The most common reason for accepted claim was infection followed by lack of indication. BioMed Central 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10585783/ /pubmed/37853493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00378-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lian, Ola Midtsaether
Randsborg, Per-Henrik
Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn
Khan Bukholm, Ida Rashida
Aae, Tommy Frøseth
Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway
title Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway
title_full Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway
title_fullStr Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway
title_short Prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in Norway
title_sort prevalence of malpractice claims after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: analysis of 69,097 procedures from a national registry in norway
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10585783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00378-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lianolamidtsaether prevalenceofmalpracticeclaimsafterarthroscopicshouldersurgeryanalysisof69097proceduresfromanationalregistryinnorway
AT randsborgperhenrik prevalenceofmalpracticeclaimsafterarthroscopicshouldersurgeryanalysisof69097proceduresfromanationalregistryinnorway
AT jakobsenrunebruhn prevalenceofmalpracticeclaimsafterarthroscopicshouldersurgeryanalysisof69097proceduresfromanationalregistryinnorway
AT khanbukholmidarashida prevalenceofmalpracticeclaimsafterarthroscopicshouldersurgeryanalysisof69097proceduresfromanationalregistryinnorway
AT aaetommyfrøseth prevalenceofmalpracticeclaimsafterarthroscopicshouldersurgeryanalysisof69097proceduresfromanationalregistryinnorway