Cargando…

Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study

OBJECTIVE: The microdebrider is a powered surgical instrument that is widely used in the field of otolaryngology. We aim to identify the type and frequency of device malfunctions, patient complications, and subsequent interventions related to the use of microdebriders. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magge, Hari, Lee, Esther, Shaver, Timothy B., Thakkar, Punam G., Singh, Ameet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.83
_version_ 1785123210699735040
author Magge, Hari
Lee, Esther
Shaver, Timothy B.
Thakkar, Punam G.
Singh, Ameet
author_facet Magge, Hari
Lee, Esther
Shaver, Timothy B.
Thakkar, Punam G.
Singh, Ameet
author_sort Magge, Hari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The microdebrider is a powered surgical instrument that is widely used in the field of otolaryngology. We aim to identify the type and frequency of device malfunctions, patient complications, and subsequent interventions related to the use of microdebriders. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional analysis. SETTING: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2011 to 2021 Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS: The MAUDE database was queried for reports of “microdebrider,” with adverse events selected that pertained to usage in head and neck surgeries from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: There were 282 adverse events in 267 individual medical device reports (MDR). Although the majority of the reports did not specify the specific operation, endoscopic sinus surgery was the most common reported procedure (89, 33.3%). The most common cause of device malfunction was due to a broken piece (120, 48.2%) followed by overheating of the microdebrider motor (78, 31.3%). Of the reports which specified patient injury, the most commonly reported was “unintentional tissue damage,” (10, 32.3%). CONCLUSION: The microdebrider has demonstrated utility within the field of otolaryngology, but is not without risk of malfunction that can cause patient injury. By understanding possible risks of microdebrider usage, including tissue damage, burns, and bleeds caused by device malfunction or operator error, physicians can be better prepared to address complications and educate patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10586755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105867552023-10-20 Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study Magge, Hari Lee, Esther Shaver, Timothy B. Thakkar, Punam G. Singh, Ameet OTO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: The microdebrider is a powered surgical instrument that is widely used in the field of otolaryngology. We aim to identify the type and frequency of device malfunctions, patient complications, and subsequent interventions related to the use of microdebriders. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional analysis. SETTING: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2011 to 2021 Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS: The MAUDE database was queried for reports of “microdebrider,” with adverse events selected that pertained to usage in head and neck surgeries from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: There were 282 adverse events in 267 individual medical device reports (MDR). Although the majority of the reports did not specify the specific operation, endoscopic sinus surgery was the most common reported procedure (89, 33.3%). The most common cause of device malfunction was due to a broken piece (120, 48.2%) followed by overheating of the microdebrider motor (78, 31.3%). Of the reports which specified patient injury, the most commonly reported was “unintentional tissue damage,” (10, 32.3%). CONCLUSION: The microdebrider has demonstrated utility within the field of otolaryngology, but is not without risk of malfunction that can cause patient injury. By understanding possible risks of microdebrider usage, including tissue damage, burns, and bleeds caused by device malfunction or operator error, physicians can be better prepared to address complications and educate patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10586755/ /pubmed/37868127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.83 Text en © 2023 The Authors. OTO Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Magge, Hari
Lee, Esther
Shaver, Timothy B.
Thakkar, Punam G.
Singh, Ameet
Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study
title Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study
title_full Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study
title_fullStr Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study
title_full_unstemmed Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study
title_short Complications Associated with Microdebriders in Otolaryngology Procedures from 2011 to 2021: A MAUDE Study
title_sort complications associated with microdebriders in otolaryngology procedures from 2011 to 2021: a maude study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.83
work_keys_str_mv AT maggehari complicationsassociatedwithmicrodebridersinotolaryngologyproceduresfrom2011to2021amaudestudy
AT leeesther complicationsassociatedwithmicrodebridersinotolaryngologyproceduresfrom2011to2021amaudestudy
AT shavertimothyb complicationsassociatedwithmicrodebridersinotolaryngologyproceduresfrom2011to2021amaudestudy
AT thakkarpunamg complicationsassociatedwithmicrodebridersinotolaryngologyproceduresfrom2011to2021amaudestudy
AT singhameet complicationsassociatedwithmicrodebridersinotolaryngologyproceduresfrom2011to2021amaudestudy