Cargando…

CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with prim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oudin, Victor, Salleron, Julia, Marchesi, Vincent, Peiffert, Didier, Khadige, Myriam, Faivre, Jean-Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868838
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1245
_version_ 1785123262385094656
author Oudin, Victor
Salleron, Julia
Marchesi, Vincent
Peiffert, Didier
Khadige, Myriam
Faivre, Jean-Christophe
author_facet Oudin, Victor
Salleron, Julia
Marchesi, Vincent
Peiffert, Didier
Khadige, Myriam
Faivre, Jean-Christophe
author_sort Oudin, Victor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with primary or secondary lung tumors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine of patients treated for primary lung cancer or pulmonary oligometastases with SBRT from January 2013 to July 2016. We included patients at least 18 years old who had stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases and a follow-up of at least 1 month. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were included. Tumors included 122 lung metastases, 89 stage I NSCLC, and 83 non-histologically confirmed lung lesions. The tracking methods were Synchrony(®) in 191 cases (119 gold seeds and 72 coils) and Xsight(®) Spine with 4D computed tomography in 103 cases. Median follow-up was 31.6 months [interquartile range (IQR), 18.1–50.2 months]. The two- and five-year probability of local control were respectively 92.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–0.95] and 85.35% (95% CI: 0.79–0.99). The two- and five-year probability of overall survival were respectively 87.46% and 72.77% (P=0.586). Local control rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.685) (gold seeds, coils or Xsight(®) Spine) within tumors grouped by location, gross tumor volume (GTV) (respectively P=0.9, P=0.7, and P=0.4), planning target volume (PTV) (respectively P=0.4, P=0.9, and P=0.7), or PTV/GTV ratio (respectively P=0.6, P=0.6, and P=0.5). Metastasis-free survival and Overall survival rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.664 and P=0.586, respectively). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities and only one grade 3 pneumonitis and one grade 3 pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Fiducial-less SBRT using Xsight(®) Spine is a safe alternative to Synchrony(®) using gold seeds or coils, with comparable local control and overall survival rates and a similar toxicity profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10586995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105869952023-10-21 CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study Oudin, Victor Salleron, Julia Marchesi, Vincent Peiffert, Didier Khadige, Myriam Faivre, Jean-Christophe J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with primary or secondary lung tumors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine of patients treated for primary lung cancer or pulmonary oligometastases with SBRT from January 2013 to July 2016. We included patients at least 18 years old who had stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases and a follow-up of at least 1 month. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were included. Tumors included 122 lung metastases, 89 stage I NSCLC, and 83 non-histologically confirmed lung lesions. The tracking methods were Synchrony(®) in 191 cases (119 gold seeds and 72 coils) and Xsight(®) Spine with 4D computed tomography in 103 cases. Median follow-up was 31.6 months [interquartile range (IQR), 18.1–50.2 months]. The two- and five-year probability of local control were respectively 92.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–0.95] and 85.35% (95% CI: 0.79–0.99). The two- and five-year probability of overall survival were respectively 87.46% and 72.77% (P=0.586). Local control rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.685) (gold seeds, coils or Xsight(®) Spine) within tumors grouped by location, gross tumor volume (GTV) (respectively P=0.9, P=0.7, and P=0.4), planning target volume (PTV) (respectively P=0.4, P=0.9, and P=0.7), or PTV/GTV ratio (respectively P=0.6, P=0.6, and P=0.5). Metastasis-free survival and Overall survival rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.664 and P=0.586, respectively). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities and only one grade 3 pneumonitis and one grade 3 pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Fiducial-less SBRT using Xsight(®) Spine is a safe alternative to Synchrony(®) using gold seeds or coils, with comparable local control and overall survival rates and a similar toxicity profile. AME Publishing Company 2023-08-11 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10586995/ /pubmed/37868838 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1245 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Oudin, Victor
Salleron, Julia
Marchesi, Vincent
Peiffert, Didier
Khadige, Myriam
Faivre, Jean-Christophe
CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
title CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
title_full CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
title_fullStr CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
title_short CyberKnife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
title_sort cyberknife(®) stereotactic radiation therapy for stage i lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?—a cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868838
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1245
work_keys_str_mv AT oudinvictor cyberknifestereotacticradiationtherapyforstageilungcancerandpulmonaryoligometastasesisfiducialimplantationstillrelevantacohortstudy
AT salleronjulia cyberknifestereotacticradiationtherapyforstageilungcancerandpulmonaryoligometastasesisfiducialimplantationstillrelevantacohortstudy
AT marchesivincent cyberknifestereotacticradiationtherapyforstageilungcancerandpulmonaryoligometastasesisfiducialimplantationstillrelevantacohortstudy
AT peiffertdidier cyberknifestereotacticradiationtherapyforstageilungcancerandpulmonaryoligometastasesisfiducialimplantationstillrelevantacohortstudy
AT khadigemyriam cyberknifestereotacticradiationtherapyforstageilungcancerandpulmonaryoligometastasesisfiducialimplantationstillrelevantacohortstudy
AT faivrejeanchristophe cyberknifestereotacticradiationtherapyforstageilungcancerandpulmonaryoligometastasesisfiducialimplantationstillrelevantacohortstudy