Cargando…
Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal pain management for esophagectomy facilitates prevention of postoperative complications such as pneumonia, but also chronic pain. Historically, multimodal intravenous analgesia was employed. In the last decades, regional anesthesia including epidural and paravertebr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868851 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-241 |
_version_ | 1785123263071911936 |
---|---|
author | Feenstra, Minke L. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hollmann, Markus W. Hermanides, Jeroen Eshuis, Wietse J. |
author_facet | Feenstra, Minke L. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hollmann, Markus W. Hermanides, Jeroen Eshuis, Wietse J. |
author_sort | Feenstra, Minke L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal pain management for esophagectomy facilitates prevention of postoperative complications such as pneumonia, but also chronic pain. Historically, multimodal intravenous analgesia was employed. In the last decades, regional anesthesia including epidural and paravertebral analgesia is frequently used. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence for the different analgesia regimens for esophagectomy. METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database in November 2022. Only reports in English or Dutch were included. Editorials or articles lacking full text were excluded. A review of different analgesia regimens after esophagectomy is provided. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Epidural analgesia (EA) was suggested to reduce postoperative pneumonia and prevent chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) as compared to opioid-based systemic analgesia and was considered the gold standard of pain management for esophagectomy. In the last decades, the side-effects of EA became more evident. Next to mild or moderate side-effects such as hypotension and urinary retention, several reports emphasized the incidence of serious neurologic complications to be much higher than estimated before. In addition, minimally invasive surgery fostered that other regional analgesia (RA) techniques are potential alternatives for EA. Paravertebral catheter placement can be performed under videoscope view during the thoracic phase of esophagectomy, making it a safe and easily placed block. Evidence on the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is limited in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Several analgesia regimens after esophagectomy are described. EA is most common, however paravertebral analgesia is a good alternative. Other techniques are also gaining ground but randomized clinical trials are lacking. Future studies should focus on the efficacy of paravertebral and erector spinae blocks for postoperative pain management for esophagectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10586998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105869982023-10-21 Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review Feenstra, Minke L. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hollmann, Markus W. Hermanides, Jeroen Eshuis, Wietse J. J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal pain management for esophagectomy facilitates prevention of postoperative complications such as pneumonia, but also chronic pain. Historically, multimodal intravenous analgesia was employed. In the last decades, regional anesthesia including epidural and paravertebral analgesia is frequently used. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence for the different analgesia regimens for esophagectomy. METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database in November 2022. Only reports in English or Dutch were included. Editorials or articles lacking full text were excluded. A review of different analgesia regimens after esophagectomy is provided. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Epidural analgesia (EA) was suggested to reduce postoperative pneumonia and prevent chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) as compared to opioid-based systemic analgesia and was considered the gold standard of pain management for esophagectomy. In the last decades, the side-effects of EA became more evident. Next to mild or moderate side-effects such as hypotension and urinary retention, several reports emphasized the incidence of serious neurologic complications to be much higher than estimated before. In addition, minimally invasive surgery fostered that other regional analgesia (RA) techniques are potential alternatives for EA. Paravertebral catheter placement can be performed under videoscope view during the thoracic phase of esophagectomy, making it a safe and easily placed block. Evidence on the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is limited in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Several analgesia regimens after esophagectomy are described. EA is most common, however paravertebral analgesia is a good alternative. Other techniques are also gaining ground but randomized clinical trials are lacking. Future studies should focus on the efficacy of paravertebral and erector spinae blocks for postoperative pain management for esophagectomy. AME Publishing Company 2023-09-01 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10586998/ /pubmed/37868851 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-241 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Feenstra, Minke L. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hollmann, Markus W. Hermanides, Jeroen Eshuis, Wietse J. Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
title | Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
title_full | Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
title_short | Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
title_sort | analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868851 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feenstraminkel analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview AT hollmannmarkusw analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview AT hermanidesjeroen analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview AT eshuiswietsej analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview |