Cargando…

Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal pain management for esophagectomy facilitates prevention of postoperative complications such as pneumonia, but also chronic pain. Historically, multimodal intravenous analgesia was employed. In the last decades, regional anesthesia including epidural and paravertebr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feenstra, Minke L., van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I., Hollmann, Markus W., Hermanides, Jeroen, Eshuis, Wietse J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868851
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-241
_version_ 1785123263071911936
author Feenstra, Minke L.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Hollmann, Markus W.
Hermanides, Jeroen
Eshuis, Wietse J.
author_facet Feenstra, Minke L.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Hollmann, Markus W.
Hermanides, Jeroen
Eshuis, Wietse J.
author_sort Feenstra, Minke L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal pain management for esophagectomy facilitates prevention of postoperative complications such as pneumonia, but also chronic pain. Historically, multimodal intravenous analgesia was employed. In the last decades, regional anesthesia including epidural and paravertebral analgesia is frequently used. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence for the different analgesia regimens for esophagectomy. METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database in November 2022. Only reports in English or Dutch were included. Editorials or articles lacking full text were excluded. A review of different analgesia regimens after esophagectomy is provided. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Epidural analgesia (EA) was suggested to reduce postoperative pneumonia and prevent chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) as compared to opioid-based systemic analgesia and was considered the gold standard of pain management for esophagectomy. In the last decades, the side-effects of EA became more evident. Next to mild or moderate side-effects such as hypotension and urinary retention, several reports emphasized the incidence of serious neurologic complications to be much higher than estimated before. In addition, minimally invasive surgery fostered that other regional analgesia (RA) techniques are potential alternatives for EA. Paravertebral catheter placement can be performed under videoscope view during the thoracic phase of esophagectomy, making it a safe and easily placed block. Evidence on the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is limited in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Several analgesia regimens after esophagectomy are described. EA is most common, however paravertebral analgesia is a good alternative. Other techniques are also gaining ground but randomized clinical trials are lacking. Future studies should focus on the efficacy of paravertebral and erector spinae blocks for postoperative pain management for esophagectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10586998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105869982023-10-21 Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review Feenstra, Minke L. van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Hollmann, Markus W. Hermanides, Jeroen Eshuis, Wietse J. J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal pain management for esophagectomy facilitates prevention of postoperative complications such as pneumonia, but also chronic pain. Historically, multimodal intravenous analgesia was employed. In the last decades, regional anesthesia including epidural and paravertebral analgesia is frequently used. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence for the different analgesia regimens for esophagectomy. METHODS: A search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database in November 2022. Only reports in English or Dutch were included. Editorials or articles lacking full text were excluded. A review of different analgesia regimens after esophagectomy is provided. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Epidural analgesia (EA) was suggested to reduce postoperative pneumonia and prevent chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) as compared to opioid-based systemic analgesia and was considered the gold standard of pain management for esophagectomy. In the last decades, the side-effects of EA became more evident. Next to mild or moderate side-effects such as hypotension and urinary retention, several reports emphasized the incidence of serious neurologic complications to be much higher than estimated before. In addition, minimally invasive surgery fostered that other regional analgesia (RA) techniques are potential alternatives for EA. Paravertebral catheter placement can be performed under videoscope view during the thoracic phase of esophagectomy, making it a safe and easily placed block. Evidence on the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is limited in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Several analgesia regimens after esophagectomy are described. EA is most common, however paravertebral analgesia is a good alternative. Other techniques are also gaining ground but randomized clinical trials are lacking. Future studies should focus on the efficacy of paravertebral and erector spinae blocks for postoperative pain management for esophagectomy. AME Publishing Company 2023-09-01 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10586998/ /pubmed/37868851 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-241 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Feenstra, Minke L.
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Hollmann, Markus W.
Hermanides, Jeroen
Eshuis, Wietse J.
Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
title Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
title_full Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
title_fullStr Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
title_short Analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
title_sort analgesia in esophagectomy: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868851
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-241
work_keys_str_mv AT feenstraminkel analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview
AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview
AT hollmannmarkusw analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview
AT hermanidesjeroen analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview
AT eshuiswietsej analgesiainesophagectomyanarrativereview