Cargando…

Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calatayud, Emma, Montomoli, Marco, Ávila, Ana, Sancho Calabuig, Asunción, Alegre-Sancho, Juan José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37650922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05389-0
_version_ 1785123311711158272
author Calatayud, Emma
Montomoli, Marco
Ávila, Ana
Sancho Calabuig, Asunción
Alegre-Sancho, Juan José
author_facet Calatayud, Emma
Montomoli, Marco
Ávila, Ana
Sancho Calabuig, Asunción
Alegre-Sancho, Juan José
author_sort Calatayud, Emma
collection PubMed
description Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional induction treatment have been tested in randomized clinical trials with heterogeneous results. Like many others biologic therapies, Abatacept has not shown a clear benefit in the context of clinical trials. We present two cases of lupus nephritis patients in whom addition of abatacept resulted in complete remission of the renal disease. The first case described a 49-year-old male with class IV lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria and high immunological activity refractory to conventional treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids and multitarget therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Several biological therapies (rituximab, belimumab and tocilizumab) were unsuccessfully tried, so that abatacept was added to his background multitarget therapy showing complete clinical response. The second case described a 52-year-old female with class IV lupus nephritis treated initially with conventional treatment with partial response. In successive renal flares with nephrotic proteinuria, she showed intolerance to rituximab and refractoriness to voclosporin. Finally, abatacept was added to her background therapy with MMF and PDN showing complete and maintained remission of the disease. In no case the use of abatacept was associated with serious adverse events. Based on our experience, abatacept should be considered as a safe rescue therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis and proteinuria with nephrotic range. In addition to this case, we reviewed the use of abatacept in lupus nephritis in the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10587212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105872122023-10-21 Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis Calatayud, Emma Montomoli, Marco Ávila, Ana Sancho Calabuig, Asunción Alegre-Sancho, Juan José Rheumatol Int Case Based Review Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional induction treatment have been tested in randomized clinical trials with heterogeneous results. Like many others biologic therapies, Abatacept has not shown a clear benefit in the context of clinical trials. We present two cases of lupus nephritis patients in whom addition of abatacept resulted in complete remission of the renal disease. The first case described a 49-year-old male with class IV lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria and high immunological activity refractory to conventional treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids and multitarget therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Several biological therapies (rituximab, belimumab and tocilizumab) were unsuccessfully tried, so that abatacept was added to his background multitarget therapy showing complete clinical response. The second case described a 52-year-old female with class IV lupus nephritis treated initially with conventional treatment with partial response. In successive renal flares with nephrotic proteinuria, she showed intolerance to rituximab and refractoriness to voclosporin. Finally, abatacept was added to her background therapy with MMF and PDN showing complete and maintained remission of the disease. In no case the use of abatacept was associated with serious adverse events. Based on our experience, abatacept should be considered as a safe rescue therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis and proteinuria with nephrotic range. In addition to this case, we reviewed the use of abatacept in lupus nephritis in the literature. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10587212/ /pubmed/37650922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05389-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Based Review
Calatayud, Emma
Montomoli, Marco
Ávila, Ana
Sancho Calabuig, Asunción
Alegre-Sancho, Juan José
Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
title Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
title_full Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
title_fullStr Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
title_full_unstemmed Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
title_short Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
title_sort experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis
topic Case Based Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37650922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05389-0
work_keys_str_mv AT calatayudemma experiencewithabataceptinrefractorylupusnephritis
AT montomolimarco experiencewithabataceptinrefractorylupusnephritis
AT avilaana experiencewithabataceptinrefractorylupusnephritis
AT sanchocalabuigasuncion experiencewithabataceptinrefractorylupusnephritis
AT alegresanchojuanjose experiencewithabataceptinrefractorylupusnephritis