Cargando…

Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a recent procedure to correct and reduce spinal curves in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the expected curve reduction and potential complicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roser, Megan J., Askin, Geoffrey N., Labrom, Robert D., Zahir, Syeda Farah, Izatt, Maree, Little, J. Paige
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9
_version_ 1785123314728960000
author Roser, Megan J.
Askin, Geoffrey N.
Labrom, Robert D.
Zahir, Syeda Farah
Izatt, Maree
Little, J. Paige
author_facet Roser, Megan J.
Askin, Geoffrey N.
Labrom, Robert D.
Zahir, Syeda Farah
Izatt, Maree
Little, J. Paige
author_sort Roser, Megan J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a recent procedure to correct and reduce spinal curves in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the expected curve reduction and potential complications for adolescent patients after VBT. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched until February 2022. Records were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data sources were prospective and retrospective studies. Demographics, mean differences in Cobb angle, surgical details and complication rates were recorded. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: This systematic review includes 19 studies, and the meta-analysis includes 16 of these. VBT displayed a statistically significant reduction in Cobb angle from pre-operative to final (minimum 2 years) measurements. The initial mean Cobb angle was 47.8° (CI 95% 42.9–52.7°) and decreased to 22.2° (CI 95% 19.9–24.5°). The mean difference is − 25.8° (CI 95% − 28.9–22.7) (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 23% (CI 95% 14.4–31.6%), the most common complication was tether breakage 21.9% (CI 95% 10.6–33.1%). The spinal fusion rate was 7.2% (CI 95% 2.3–12.1%). CONCLUSION: VBT results in a significant reduction of AIS at 2 years of follow-up. Overall complication rate was relatively high although the consequences of the complications are unknown. Further research is required to explore the reasons behind the complication rate and determine the optimal timing for the procedure. VBT remains a promising new procedure that is effective at reducing scoliotic curves and preventing spinal fusion in the majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of Therapeutic Studies with evidence level II–IV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10587225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105872252023-10-21 Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Roser, Megan J. Askin, Geoffrey N. Labrom, Robert D. Zahir, Syeda Farah Izatt, Maree Little, J. Paige Spine Deform Review Article PURPOSE: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a recent procedure to correct and reduce spinal curves in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the expected curve reduction and potential complications for adolescent patients after VBT. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched until February 2022. Records were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data sources were prospective and retrospective studies. Demographics, mean differences in Cobb angle, surgical details and complication rates were recorded. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: This systematic review includes 19 studies, and the meta-analysis includes 16 of these. VBT displayed a statistically significant reduction in Cobb angle from pre-operative to final (minimum 2 years) measurements. The initial mean Cobb angle was 47.8° (CI 95% 42.9–52.7°) and decreased to 22.2° (CI 95% 19.9–24.5°). The mean difference is − 25.8° (CI 95% − 28.9–22.7) (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 23% (CI 95% 14.4–31.6%), the most common complication was tether breakage 21.9% (CI 95% 10.6–33.1%). The spinal fusion rate was 7.2% (CI 95% 2.3–12.1%). CONCLUSION: VBT results in a significant reduction of AIS at 2 years of follow-up. Overall complication rate was relatively high although the consequences of the complications are unknown. Further research is required to explore the reasons behind the complication rate and determine the optimal timing for the procedure. VBT remains a promising new procedure that is effective at reducing scoliotic curves and preventing spinal fusion in the majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of Therapeutic Studies with evidence level II–IV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10587225/ /pubmed/37432604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Roser, Megan J.
Askin, Geoffrey N.
Labrom, Robert D.
Zahir, Syeda Farah
Izatt, Maree
Little, J. Paige
Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rosermeganj vertebralbodytetheringforidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT askingeoffreyn vertebralbodytetheringforidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT labromrobertd vertebralbodytetheringforidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zahirsyedafarah vertebralbodytetheringforidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT izattmaree vertebralbodytetheringforidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT littlejpaige vertebralbodytetheringforidiopathicscoliosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis