Cargando…
Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent tumor among men in Europe and has both indolent and aggressive forms. There are several treatment options, the choice of which depends on multiple factors. To further improve current prognostication models, we established the Turin Prostate Ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1242639 |
_version_ | 1785123392287932416 |
---|---|
author | Destefanis, Nicolas Fiano, Valentina Milani, Lorenzo Vasapolli, Paolo Fiorentino, Michelangelo Giunchi, Francesca Lianas, Luca Del Rio, Mauro Frexia, Francesca Pireddu, Luca Molinaro, Luca Cassoni, Paola Papotti, Mauro Giulio Gontero, Paolo Calleris, Giorgio Oderda, Marco Ricardi, Umberto Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo Fariselli, Piero Isaevska, Elena Akre, Olof Zelic, Renata Pettersson, Andreas Zugna, Daniela Richiardi, Lorenzo |
author_facet | Destefanis, Nicolas Fiano, Valentina Milani, Lorenzo Vasapolli, Paolo Fiorentino, Michelangelo Giunchi, Francesca Lianas, Luca Del Rio, Mauro Frexia, Francesca Pireddu, Luca Molinaro, Luca Cassoni, Paola Papotti, Mauro Giulio Gontero, Paolo Calleris, Giorgio Oderda, Marco Ricardi, Umberto Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo Fariselli, Piero Isaevska, Elena Akre, Olof Zelic, Renata Pettersson, Andreas Zugna, Daniela Richiardi, Lorenzo |
author_sort | Destefanis, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent tumor among men in Europe and has both indolent and aggressive forms. There are several treatment options, the choice of which depends on multiple factors. To further improve current prognostication models, we established the Turin Prostate Cancer Prognostication (TPCP) cohort, an Italian retrospective biopsy cohort of patients with PCa and long-term follow-up. This work presents this new cohort with its main characteristics and the distributions of some of its core variables, along with its potential contributions to PCa research. METHODS: The TPCP cohort includes consecutive non-metastatic patients with first positive biopsy for PCa performed between 2008 and 2013 at the main hospital in Turin, Italy. The follow-up ended on December 31(st) 2021. The primary outcome is the occurrence of metastasis; death from PCa and overall mortality are the secondary outcomes. In addition to numerous clinical variables, the study’s prognostic variables include histopathologic information assigned by a centralized uropathology review using a digital pathology software system specialized for the study of PCa, tumor DNA methylation in candidate genes, and features extracted from digitized slide images via Deep Neural Networks. RESULTS: The cohort includes 891 patients followed-up for a median time of 10 years. During this period, 97 patients had progression to metastatic disease and 301 died; of these, 56 died from PCa. In total, 65.3% of the cohort has a Gleason score less than or equal to 3 + 4, and 44.5% has a clinical stage cT1. Consistent with previous studies, age and clinical stage at diagnosis are important prognostic factors: the crude cumulative incidence of metastatic disease during the 14-years of follow-up increases from 9.1% among patients younger than 64 to 16.2% for patients in the age group of 75-84, and from 6.1% for cT1 stage to 27.9% in cT3 stage. DISCUSSION: This study stands to be an important resource for updating existing prognostic models for PCa on an Italian cohort. In addition, the integrated collection of multi-modal data will allow development and/or validation of new models including new histopathological, digital, and molecular markers, with the goal of better directing clinical decisions to manage patients with PCa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10587560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105875602023-10-21 Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort Destefanis, Nicolas Fiano, Valentina Milani, Lorenzo Vasapolli, Paolo Fiorentino, Michelangelo Giunchi, Francesca Lianas, Luca Del Rio, Mauro Frexia, Francesca Pireddu, Luca Molinaro, Luca Cassoni, Paola Papotti, Mauro Giulio Gontero, Paolo Calleris, Giorgio Oderda, Marco Ricardi, Umberto Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo Fariselli, Piero Isaevska, Elena Akre, Olof Zelic, Renata Pettersson, Andreas Zugna, Daniela Richiardi, Lorenzo Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent tumor among men in Europe and has both indolent and aggressive forms. There are several treatment options, the choice of which depends on multiple factors. To further improve current prognostication models, we established the Turin Prostate Cancer Prognostication (TPCP) cohort, an Italian retrospective biopsy cohort of patients with PCa and long-term follow-up. This work presents this new cohort with its main characteristics and the distributions of some of its core variables, along with its potential contributions to PCa research. METHODS: The TPCP cohort includes consecutive non-metastatic patients with first positive biopsy for PCa performed between 2008 and 2013 at the main hospital in Turin, Italy. The follow-up ended on December 31(st) 2021. The primary outcome is the occurrence of metastasis; death from PCa and overall mortality are the secondary outcomes. In addition to numerous clinical variables, the study’s prognostic variables include histopathologic information assigned by a centralized uropathology review using a digital pathology software system specialized for the study of PCa, tumor DNA methylation in candidate genes, and features extracted from digitized slide images via Deep Neural Networks. RESULTS: The cohort includes 891 patients followed-up for a median time of 10 years. During this period, 97 patients had progression to metastatic disease and 301 died; of these, 56 died from PCa. In total, 65.3% of the cohort has a Gleason score less than or equal to 3 + 4, and 44.5% has a clinical stage cT1. Consistent with previous studies, age and clinical stage at diagnosis are important prognostic factors: the crude cumulative incidence of metastatic disease during the 14-years of follow-up increases from 9.1% among patients younger than 64 to 16.2% for patients in the age group of 75-84, and from 6.1% for cT1 stage to 27.9% in cT3 stage. DISCUSSION: This study stands to be an important resource for updating existing prognostic models for PCa on an Italian cohort. In addition, the integrated collection of multi-modal data will allow development and/or validation of new models including new histopathological, digital, and molecular markers, with the goal of better directing clinical decisions to manage patients with PCa. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10587560/ /pubmed/37869094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1242639 Text en Copyright © 2023 Destefanis, Fiano, Milani, Vasapolli, Fiorentino, Giunchi, Lianas, Del Rio, Frexia, Pireddu, Molinaro, Cassoni, Papotti, Gontero, Calleris, Oderda, Ricardi, Iorio, Fariselli, Isaevska, Akre, Zelic, Pettersson, Zugna and Richiardi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Destefanis, Nicolas Fiano, Valentina Milani, Lorenzo Vasapolli, Paolo Fiorentino, Michelangelo Giunchi, Francesca Lianas, Luca Del Rio, Mauro Frexia, Francesca Pireddu, Luca Molinaro, Luca Cassoni, Paola Papotti, Mauro Giulio Gontero, Paolo Calleris, Giorgio Oderda, Marco Ricardi, Umberto Iorio, Giuseppe Carlo Fariselli, Piero Isaevska, Elena Akre, Olof Zelic, Renata Pettersson, Andreas Zugna, Daniela Richiardi, Lorenzo Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort |
title | Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort |
title_full | Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort |
title_fullStr | Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort |
title_short | Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort |
title_sort | cohort profile: the turin prostate cancer prognostication (tpcp) cohort |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1242639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT destefanisnicolas cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT fianovalentina cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT milanilorenzo cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT vasapollipaolo cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT fiorentinomichelangelo cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT giunchifrancesca cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT lianasluca cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT delriomauro cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT frexiafrancesca cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT piredduluca cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT molinaroluca cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT cassonipaola cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT papottimaurogiulio cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT gonteropaolo cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT callerisgiorgio cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT oderdamarco cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT ricardiumberto cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT ioriogiuseppecarlo cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT farisellipiero cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT isaevskaelena cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT akreolof cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT zelicrenata cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT petterssonandreas cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT zugnadaniela cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort AT richiardilorenzo cohortprofiletheturinprostatecancerprognosticationtpcpcohort |