Cargando…

Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus

PURPOSE: To introduce the novel parameter of Corneal Contribution to Stress (CCS) and compare stress distribution patterns between keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 66 eyes of 40 subjects diagnosed with K...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Cynthia J., Knoll, Kayla M., Mahmoud, Ashraf M., Hendershot, Andrew J., Yuhas, Phillip T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100373
_version_ 1785123409050468352
author Roberts, Cynthia J.
Knoll, Kayla M.
Mahmoud, Ashraf M.
Hendershot, Andrew J.
Yuhas, Phillip T.
author_facet Roberts, Cynthia J.
Knoll, Kayla M.
Mahmoud, Ashraf M.
Hendershot, Andrew J.
Yuhas, Phillip T.
author_sort Roberts, Cynthia J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To introduce the novel parameter of Corneal Contribution to Stress (CCS) and compare stress distribution patterns between keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 66 eyes of 40 subjects diagnosed with KCN and 155 left eyes from 155 normal control (NRL) subjects. METHODS: Tomography was obtained to calculate the newly proposed CCS, defined according to the hoop stress formula without intraocular pressure, R/2t, where R is the radius of curvature and t is the thickness. CCS maps were calculated from pachymetry and tangential curvature maps. Custom software identified the 2-mm-diameter zones of greatest curvature (Cspot-max), thinnest pachymetry (Pach-min), greatest stress (CCSmax), and lowest stress (CCSmin). Stress difference (CCSdiff) was calculated as CCSmax – CCSmin. Distances between Cspot-max vs. Pach-min, vs. CCSmax, and vs. CCSmin, as well as between Pach-min vs. CCSmax and vs. CCSmin, were calculated. t tests were performed between cohorts, and paired t tests were performed within cohorts. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed between parameters and distances. The significance threshold was P < 0.05. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal stress parameters, corneal features of maximum curvature, minimum thickness, and distances between corneal stress parameters and corneal features. RESULTS: CCSmax was significantly closer to Pach-min (0.79 ± 0.92) and Cspot-max (2.04 ± 0.85) than CCSmin (3.17 ± 0.38, 2.73 ± 1.53, respectively) in NRL, P < 0.0001, whereas CCSmin was significantly closer to Cspot-max (1.35 ± 1.43) than CCSmax (2.52 ± 0.72) in KCN, P < 0.0001. Cspot-max (severity) was significantly related to CCSdiff in KCN (P < 0.0001; R(2) = 0.5882) with a weak relationship in NRL (P < 0.0080, R(2) = 0.0451). Cspot-max was significantly related to the distance from Pach-min to CCSmax (P < 0.0001; R(2) = 0.3737) without significance in NRL (P = 0.8011). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal stress is driven by thickness in NRL, with greatest stress at thinnest pachymetry and greatest curvature. However, maximum stress moves away from thinnest pachymetry with progression in KCN, and minimum stress is associated with maximum curvature. Severity in KCN is significantly related to greater difference between maximum and minimum stress, consistent with the biomechanical cycle of decompensation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10587627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105876272023-10-21 Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus Roberts, Cynthia J. Knoll, Kayla M. Mahmoud, Ashraf M. Hendershot, Andrew J. Yuhas, Phillip T. Ophthalmol Sci Original Article PURPOSE: To introduce the novel parameter of Corneal Contribution to Stress (CCS) and compare stress distribution patterns between keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 66 eyes of 40 subjects diagnosed with KCN and 155 left eyes from 155 normal control (NRL) subjects. METHODS: Tomography was obtained to calculate the newly proposed CCS, defined according to the hoop stress formula without intraocular pressure, R/2t, where R is the radius of curvature and t is the thickness. CCS maps were calculated from pachymetry and tangential curvature maps. Custom software identified the 2-mm-diameter zones of greatest curvature (Cspot-max), thinnest pachymetry (Pach-min), greatest stress (CCSmax), and lowest stress (CCSmin). Stress difference (CCSdiff) was calculated as CCSmax – CCSmin. Distances between Cspot-max vs. Pach-min, vs. CCSmax, and vs. CCSmin, as well as between Pach-min vs. CCSmax and vs. CCSmin, were calculated. t tests were performed between cohorts, and paired t tests were performed within cohorts. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed between parameters and distances. The significance threshold was P < 0.05. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal stress parameters, corneal features of maximum curvature, minimum thickness, and distances between corneal stress parameters and corneal features. RESULTS: CCSmax was significantly closer to Pach-min (0.79 ± 0.92) and Cspot-max (2.04 ± 0.85) than CCSmin (3.17 ± 0.38, 2.73 ± 1.53, respectively) in NRL, P < 0.0001, whereas CCSmin was significantly closer to Cspot-max (1.35 ± 1.43) than CCSmax (2.52 ± 0.72) in KCN, P < 0.0001. Cspot-max (severity) was significantly related to CCSdiff in KCN (P < 0.0001; R(2) = 0.5882) with a weak relationship in NRL (P < 0.0080, R(2) = 0.0451). Cspot-max was significantly related to the distance from Pach-min to CCSmax (P < 0.0001; R(2) = 0.3737) without significance in NRL (P = 0.8011). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal stress is driven by thickness in NRL, with greatest stress at thinnest pachymetry and greatest curvature. However, maximum stress moves away from thinnest pachymetry with progression in KCN, and minimum stress is associated with maximum curvature. Severity in KCN is significantly related to greater difference between maximum and minimum stress, consistent with the biomechanical cycle of decompensation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. Elsevier 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10587627/ /pubmed/37868791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100373 Text en © 2023 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Roberts, Cynthia J.
Knoll, Kayla M.
Mahmoud, Ashraf M.
Hendershot, Andrew J.
Yuhas, Phillip T.
Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
title Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
title_full Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
title_fullStr Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
title_short Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in Keratoconus
title_sort corneal stress distribution evolves from thickness-driven in normal corneas to curvature-driven with progression in keratoconus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100373
work_keys_str_mv AT robertscynthiaj cornealstressdistributionevolvesfromthicknessdriveninnormalcorneastocurvaturedrivenwithprogressioninkeratoconus
AT knollkaylam cornealstressdistributionevolvesfromthicknessdriveninnormalcorneastocurvaturedrivenwithprogressioninkeratoconus
AT mahmoudashrafm cornealstressdistributionevolvesfromthicknessdriveninnormalcorneastocurvaturedrivenwithprogressioninkeratoconus
AT hendershotandrewj cornealstressdistributionevolvesfromthicknessdriveninnormalcorneastocurvaturedrivenwithprogressioninkeratoconus
AT yuhasphillipt cornealstressdistributionevolvesfromthicknessdriveninnormalcorneastocurvaturedrivenwithprogressioninkeratoconus