Cargando…

Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure–function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. METHODS: Visual field test–retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th–95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure–functio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montesano, Giovanni, Lazaridis, Georgios, Ometto, Giovanni, Crabb, David P., Garway-Heath, David F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.10.10
_version_ 1785123452954345472
author Montesano, Giovanni
Lazaridis, Georgios
Ometto, Giovanni
Crabb, David P.
Garway-Heath, David F.
author_facet Montesano, Giovanni
Lazaridis, Georgios
Ometto, Giovanni
Crabb, David P.
Garway-Heath, David F.
author_sort Montesano, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure–function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. METHODS: Visual field test–retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th–95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure–function predictions were generated with a previously described DL model using cicumpapillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Structurally informed prior distributions were built grouping the observed measured sensitivities for each predicted value and recalculated for each subject with a leave-one-out approach. A zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) strategy was used for the simulations (1000 per eye). Ground-truth sensitivities for each eye were the medians of the test–retest values. Two variations of ZEST were compared in terms of speed (average total number of presentations [NP] per eye) and accuracy (average mean absolute error [MAE] per eye), using either a combination of normal and abnormal thresholds (ZEST) or the calculated structural distributions (S-ZEST) as prior information. Two additional versions of these strategies employing spatial correlations were tested. RESULTS: S-ZEST was significantly faster, with a mean average NP of 213.87 (SD = 28.18), than ZEST, with a mean average NP of 255.65 (SD = 50.27) (P < 0.001). The average MAE was smaller for S-ZEST (1.98; SD = 2.37) than ZEST (2.43; SD = 2.69) (P < 0.001). Spatial correlations further improved both strategies (P < 0.001), but the differences between ZEST and S-ZEST remained significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DL structure–function predictions can significantly improve perimetric tests. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: DL structure–function predictions from clinically available OCT scans can improve perimetry in glaucoma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10587851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105878512023-10-21 Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning Montesano, Giovanni Lazaridis, Georgios Ometto, Giovanni Crabb, David P. Garway-Heath, David F. Transl Vis Sci Technol Glaucoma PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a perimetric strategy using structure–function predictions from a deep learning (DL) model. METHODS: Visual field test–retest data from 146 eyes (75 patients) with glaucoma with (median [5th–95th percentile]) 10 [7, 10] tests per eye were used. Structure–function predictions were generated with a previously described DL model using cicumpapillary optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Structurally informed prior distributions were built grouping the observed measured sensitivities for each predicted value and recalculated for each subject with a leave-one-out approach. A zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) strategy was used for the simulations (1000 per eye). Ground-truth sensitivities for each eye were the medians of the test–retest values. Two variations of ZEST were compared in terms of speed (average total number of presentations [NP] per eye) and accuracy (average mean absolute error [MAE] per eye), using either a combination of normal and abnormal thresholds (ZEST) or the calculated structural distributions (S-ZEST) as prior information. Two additional versions of these strategies employing spatial correlations were tested. RESULTS: S-ZEST was significantly faster, with a mean average NP of 213.87 (SD = 28.18), than ZEST, with a mean average NP of 255.65 (SD = 50.27) (P < 0.001). The average MAE was smaller for S-ZEST (1.98; SD = 2.37) than ZEST (2.43; SD = 2.69) (P < 0.001). Spatial correlations further improved both strategies (P < 0.001), but the differences between ZEST and S-ZEST remained significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DL structure–function predictions can significantly improve perimetric tests. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: DL structure–function predictions from clinically available OCT scans can improve perimetry in glaucoma patients. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10587851/ /pubmed/37831447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.10.10 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Glaucoma
Montesano, Giovanni
Lazaridis, Georgios
Ometto, Giovanni
Crabb, David P.
Garway-Heath, David F.
Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning
title Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning
title_full Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning
title_fullStr Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning
title_short Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma With Structural Information and Deep Learning
title_sort improving the accuracy and speed of visual field testing in glaucoma with structural information and deep learning
topic Glaucoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37831447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.10.10
work_keys_str_mv AT montesanogiovanni improvingtheaccuracyandspeedofvisualfieldtestinginglaucomawithstructuralinformationanddeeplearning
AT lazaridisgeorgios improvingtheaccuracyandspeedofvisualfieldtestinginglaucomawithstructuralinformationanddeeplearning
AT omettogiovanni improvingtheaccuracyandspeedofvisualfieldtestinginglaucomawithstructuralinformationanddeeplearning
AT crabbdavidp improvingtheaccuracyandspeedofvisualfieldtestinginglaucomawithstructuralinformationanddeeplearning
AT garwayheathdavidf improvingtheaccuracyandspeedofvisualfieldtestinginglaucomawithstructuralinformationanddeeplearning