Cargando…
The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. METHODS: Seventy‐eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo‐ or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37772467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6541 |
_version_ | 1785123474877972480 |
---|---|
author | Chaballout, Basil H. Chang, Eric M. Shaverdian, Narek Lee, Percy P. Beron, Phillip J. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. |
author_facet | Chaballout, Basil H. Chang, Eric M. Shaverdian, Narek Lee, Percy P. Beron, Phillip J. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. |
author_sort | Chaballout, Basil H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. METHODS: Seventy‐eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo‐ or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2009 to 2018 and who were without recurrence were included. Patients were surveyed ≥6 months after ileostomy reversal or ≥3 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. The survey assessed patients' baseline knowledge and fears of RT, how their short‐ and long‐term side effects compared with initial expectations, and how their experiences compared for each modality (RT, surgery, and chemotherapy). RESULTS: Forty patient‐responses were received. Before treatment, 70% of patients indicated little to no knowledge of RT, though 43% reported hearing frightening stories about RT. The most commonly top‐ranked fears included organ damage (26%), skin burns (14%), and inability to carry out normal daily activities (10%). Eighty percent reported short‐term effects of RT to be less than or as expected, with urinary changes (93%), abdominal discomfort (90%), and anxiety (88%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. 85% reported long‐term effects to be less than or as expected, with pain (95%), changes to the appearance of the treated area (85%), and dissatisfaction with body image (80%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. Surgery was most commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (50%) and most responsible for long‐term effects (55%). RT was least commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (13%), and chemotherapy was least commonly rated as most responsible for long‐term effects (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients indicated short‐ and long‐term side effects of RT for rectal cancer to be better than initial expectations. In the context of trimodality therapy, patients reported RT to be the least difficult of the treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10587958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105879582023-10-21 The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience Chaballout, Basil H. Chang, Eric M. Shaverdian, Narek Lee, Percy P. Beron, Phillip J. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. METHODS: Seventy‐eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo‐ or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2009 to 2018 and who were without recurrence were included. Patients were surveyed ≥6 months after ileostomy reversal or ≥3 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. The survey assessed patients' baseline knowledge and fears of RT, how their short‐ and long‐term side effects compared with initial expectations, and how their experiences compared for each modality (RT, surgery, and chemotherapy). RESULTS: Forty patient‐responses were received. Before treatment, 70% of patients indicated little to no knowledge of RT, though 43% reported hearing frightening stories about RT. The most commonly top‐ranked fears included organ damage (26%), skin burns (14%), and inability to carry out normal daily activities (10%). Eighty percent reported short‐term effects of RT to be less than or as expected, with urinary changes (93%), abdominal discomfort (90%), and anxiety (88%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. 85% reported long‐term effects to be less than or as expected, with pain (95%), changes to the appearance of the treated area (85%), and dissatisfaction with body image (80%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. Surgery was most commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (50%) and most responsible for long‐term effects (55%). RT was least commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (13%), and chemotherapy was least commonly rated as most responsible for long‐term effects (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients indicated short‐ and long‐term side effects of RT for rectal cancer to be better than initial expectations. In the context of trimodality therapy, patients reported RT to be the least difficult of the treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10587958/ /pubmed/37772467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6541 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Chaballout, Basil H. Chang, Eric M. Shaverdian, Narek Lee, Percy P. Beron, Phillip J. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience |
title | The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience |
title_full | The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience |
title_fullStr | The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience |
title_full_unstemmed | The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience |
title_short | The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience |
title_sort | patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: initial expectations versus actual experience |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37772467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaballoutbasilh thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT changericm thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT shaverdiannarek thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT leepercyp thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT beronphillipj thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT steinbergmichaell thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT raldowannc thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT chaballoutbasilh patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT changericm patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT shaverdiannarek patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT leepercyp patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT beronphillipj patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT steinbergmichaell patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience AT raldowannc patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience |