Cargando…

The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. METHODS: Seventy‐eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo‐ or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaballout, Basil H., Chang, Eric M., Shaverdian, Narek, Lee, Percy P., Beron, Phillip J., Steinberg, Michael L., Raldow, Ann C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37772467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6541
_version_ 1785123474877972480
author Chaballout, Basil H.
Chang, Eric M.
Shaverdian, Narek
Lee, Percy P.
Beron, Phillip J.
Steinberg, Michael L.
Raldow, Ann C.
author_facet Chaballout, Basil H.
Chang, Eric M.
Shaverdian, Narek
Lee, Percy P.
Beron, Phillip J.
Steinberg, Michael L.
Raldow, Ann C.
author_sort Chaballout, Basil H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. METHODS: Seventy‐eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo‐ or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2009 to 2018 and who were without recurrence were included. Patients were surveyed ≥6 months after ileostomy reversal or ≥3 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. The survey assessed patients' baseline knowledge and fears of RT, how their short‐ and long‐term side effects compared with initial expectations, and how their experiences compared for each modality (RT, surgery, and chemotherapy). RESULTS: Forty patient‐responses were received. Before treatment, 70% of patients indicated little to no knowledge of RT, though 43% reported hearing frightening stories about RT. The most commonly top‐ranked fears included organ damage (26%), skin burns (14%), and inability to carry out normal daily activities (10%). Eighty percent reported short‐term effects of RT to be less than or as expected, with urinary changes (93%), abdominal discomfort (90%), and anxiety (88%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. 85% reported long‐term effects to be less than or as expected, with pain (95%), changes to the appearance of the treated area (85%), and dissatisfaction with body image (80%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. Surgery was most commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (50%) and most responsible for long‐term effects (55%). RT was least commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (13%), and chemotherapy was least commonly rated as most responsible for long‐term effects (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients indicated short‐ and long‐term side effects of RT for rectal cancer to be better than initial expectations. In the context of trimodality therapy, patients reported RT to be the least difficult of the treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10587958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105879582023-10-21 The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience Chaballout, Basil H. Chang, Eric M. Shaverdian, Narek Lee, Percy P. Beron, Phillip J. Steinberg, Michael L. Raldow, Ann C. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. METHODS: Seventy‐eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo‐ or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2009 to 2018 and who were without recurrence were included. Patients were surveyed ≥6 months after ileostomy reversal or ≥3 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. The survey assessed patients' baseline knowledge and fears of RT, how their short‐ and long‐term side effects compared with initial expectations, and how their experiences compared for each modality (RT, surgery, and chemotherapy). RESULTS: Forty patient‐responses were received. Before treatment, 70% of patients indicated little to no knowledge of RT, though 43% reported hearing frightening stories about RT. The most commonly top‐ranked fears included organ damage (26%), skin burns (14%), and inability to carry out normal daily activities (10%). Eighty percent reported short‐term effects of RT to be less than or as expected, with urinary changes (93%), abdominal discomfort (90%), and anxiety (88%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. 85% reported long‐term effects to be less than or as expected, with pain (95%), changes to the appearance of the treated area (85%), and dissatisfaction with body image (80%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. Surgery was most commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (50%) and most responsible for long‐term effects (55%). RT was least commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (13%), and chemotherapy was least commonly rated as most responsible for long‐term effects (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients indicated short‐ and long‐term side effects of RT for rectal cancer to be better than initial expectations. In the context of trimodality therapy, patients reported RT to be the least difficult of the treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10587958/ /pubmed/37772467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6541 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Chaballout, Basil H.
Chang, Eric M.
Shaverdian, Narek
Lee, Percy P.
Beron, Phillip J.
Steinberg, Michael L.
Raldow, Ann C.
The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
title The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
title_full The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
title_fullStr The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
title_full_unstemmed The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
title_short The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
title_sort patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: initial expectations versus actual experience
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37772467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6541
work_keys_str_mv AT chaballoutbasilh thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT changericm thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT shaverdiannarek thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT leepercyp thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT beronphillipj thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT steinbergmichaell thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT raldowannc thepatientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT chaballoutbasilh patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT changericm patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT shaverdiannarek patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT leepercyp patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT beronphillipj patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT steinbergmichaell patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience
AT raldowannc patientsperspectiveonradiationforrectalcancerinitialexpectationsversusactualexperience