Cargando…
Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In the digitalized world, there is a need for developing new online teaching and learning methods. Although audio and video recordings are increasingly used in everyday learning, little scientific evidence is available on the efficacy of new online methods. This randomized trial was set...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04759-3 |
_version_ | 1785123486352539648 |
---|---|
author | Tolonen, Marko Arvonen, Miika Renko, Marjo Paakkonen, Heikki Jäntti, Helena Piippo-Savolainen, Eija |
author_facet | Tolonen, Marko Arvonen, Miika Renko, Marjo Paakkonen, Heikki Jäntti, Helena Piippo-Savolainen, Eija |
author_sort | Tolonen, Marko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the digitalized world, there is a need for developing new online teaching and learning methods. Although audio and video recordings are increasingly used in everyday learning, little scientific evidence is available on the efficacy of new online methods. This randomized trial was set out to compare the learning outcomes of online and classroom teaching methods in training healthcare students to diagnose breathing difficulties in children. METHODS: In total, 301 students of medicine (N = 166) and nursing (N = 135) volunteered to participate in this total sampling study in 2021–2022. The students were randomized into four groups based on teaching methods: classroom teaching (live, N = 72), streamed classroom teaching (live-stream, N = 77), audio recording (podcast, N = 79) and video recording (vodcast, N = 73). Each 45-minute lesson was taught by the same teachers and used the same protocol. The students participated an online test with their own electronic device at three distinct time points: prior to any teaching (baseline), immediately after teaching (final test), and five weeks later (long-term memory test). The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions on recognizing breathing difficulties from real-life videos of breathing difficulties in pre-school age. The test results scale ranged from − 26 to 28 points. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA multiple comparison and multiple regression tests. RESULTS: The mean scores (SD) of the final tests were 22.5 (5.3) in the vodcast, 22.9 (6.1) in the live, 20.0 (5.6) in the podcast (p < 0.05 vs. live) and 20.1 (6.8) in the live-stream group. The mean difference of test scores before and after the lesson improved significantly (p < 0.05) in all study groups, with 12.9 (6.5) in the vodcast, 12.6 (5.6) in the live, 10.9 (7.0) in the live-stream and 10.4 (6.9) in the podcast group. The improvement in test scores was significantly higher in the vodcast (p = 0.016) and the live (p = 0.037) groups than in the podcast group. No significant differences were found between the other groups. However, there was a nonsignificant difference towards better results in the vodcast group compared to the live-stream group. CONCLUSIONS: While the new online teaching methods produce learning, only video learning is comparable to team teaching in classrooms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10588011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105880112023-10-21 Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial Tolonen, Marko Arvonen, Miika Renko, Marjo Paakkonen, Heikki Jäntti, Helena Piippo-Savolainen, Eija BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: In the digitalized world, there is a need for developing new online teaching and learning methods. Although audio and video recordings are increasingly used in everyday learning, little scientific evidence is available on the efficacy of new online methods. This randomized trial was set out to compare the learning outcomes of online and classroom teaching methods in training healthcare students to diagnose breathing difficulties in children. METHODS: In total, 301 students of medicine (N = 166) and nursing (N = 135) volunteered to participate in this total sampling study in 2021–2022. The students were randomized into four groups based on teaching methods: classroom teaching (live, N = 72), streamed classroom teaching (live-stream, N = 77), audio recording (podcast, N = 79) and video recording (vodcast, N = 73). Each 45-minute lesson was taught by the same teachers and used the same protocol. The students participated an online test with their own electronic device at three distinct time points: prior to any teaching (baseline), immediately after teaching (final test), and five weeks later (long-term memory test). The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions on recognizing breathing difficulties from real-life videos of breathing difficulties in pre-school age. The test results scale ranged from − 26 to 28 points. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA multiple comparison and multiple regression tests. RESULTS: The mean scores (SD) of the final tests were 22.5 (5.3) in the vodcast, 22.9 (6.1) in the live, 20.0 (5.6) in the podcast (p < 0.05 vs. live) and 20.1 (6.8) in the live-stream group. The mean difference of test scores before and after the lesson improved significantly (p < 0.05) in all study groups, with 12.9 (6.5) in the vodcast, 12.6 (5.6) in the live, 10.9 (7.0) in the live-stream and 10.4 (6.9) in the podcast group. The improvement in test scores was significantly higher in the vodcast (p = 0.016) and the live (p = 0.037) groups than in the podcast group. No significant differences were found between the other groups. However, there was a nonsignificant difference towards better results in the vodcast group compared to the live-stream group. CONCLUSIONS: While the new online teaching methods produce learning, only video learning is comparable to team teaching in classrooms. BioMed Central 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10588011/ /pubmed/37858105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04759-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tolonen, Marko Arvonen, Miika Renko, Marjo Paakkonen, Heikki Jäntti, Helena Piippo-Savolainen, Eija Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
title | Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of remote learning methods to on-site teaching -randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04759-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolonenmarko comparisonofremotelearningmethodstoonsiteteachingrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT arvonenmiika comparisonofremotelearningmethodstoonsiteteachingrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT renkomarjo comparisonofremotelearningmethodstoonsiteteachingrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paakkonenheikki comparisonofremotelearningmethodstoonsiteteachingrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT janttihelena comparisonofremotelearningmethodstoonsiteteachingrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT piipposavolaineneija comparisonofremotelearningmethodstoonsiteteachingrandomizedcontrolledtrial |