Cargando…

Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

Suicide is a leading cause of death and a global public health problem, representing more than one in every 100 deaths in 2019. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is widely used to address public health problems, and numerous simulation models have investigated the complex, dependent, and dynamic ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuerkamp, Ryan, Liang, Luke, Rice, Ketra L., Giabbanelli, Philippe J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers12070132
_version_ 1785123497603760128
author Schuerkamp, Ryan
Liang, Luke
Rice, Ketra L.
Giabbanelli, Philippe J.
author_facet Schuerkamp, Ryan
Liang, Luke
Rice, Ketra L.
Giabbanelli, Philippe J.
author_sort Schuerkamp, Ryan
collection PubMed
description Suicide is a leading cause of death and a global public health problem, representing more than one in every 100 deaths in 2019. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is widely used to address public health problems, and numerous simulation models have investigated the complex, dependent, and dynamic risk factors contributing to suicide. However, no review has been dedicated to these models, which prevents modelers from effectively learning from each other and raises the risk of redundant efforts. To guide the development of future models, in this paper we perform the first scoping review of simulation models for suicide prevention. Examining ten articles, we focus on three practical questions. First, which interventions are supported by previous models? We found that four groups of models collectively support 53 interventions. We examined these interventions through the lens of global recommendations for suicide prevention, highlighting future areas for model development. Second, what are the obstacles preventing model application? We noted the absence of cost effectiveness in all models reviewed, meaning that certain simulated interventions may be infeasible. Moreover, we found that most models do not account for different effects of suicide prevention interventions across demographic groups. Third, how much confidence can we place in the models? We evaluated models according to four best practices for simulation, leading to nuanced findings that, despite their current limitations, the current simulation models are powerful tools for understanding the complexity of suicide and evaluating suicide prevention interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105880592023-10-20 Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art Schuerkamp, Ryan Liang, Luke Rice, Ketra L. Giabbanelli, Philippe J. Computers (Basel) Article Suicide is a leading cause of death and a global public health problem, representing more than one in every 100 deaths in 2019. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) is widely used to address public health problems, and numerous simulation models have investigated the complex, dependent, and dynamic risk factors contributing to suicide. However, no review has been dedicated to these models, which prevents modelers from effectively learning from each other and raises the risk of redundant efforts. To guide the development of future models, in this paper we perform the first scoping review of simulation models for suicide prevention. Examining ten articles, we focus on three practical questions. First, which interventions are supported by previous models? We found that four groups of models collectively support 53 interventions. We examined these interventions through the lens of global recommendations for suicide prevention, highlighting future areas for model development. Second, what are the obstacles preventing model application? We noted the absence of cost effectiveness in all models reviewed, meaning that certain simulated interventions may be infeasible. Moreover, we found that most models do not account for different effects of suicide prevention interventions across demographic groups. Third, how much confidence can we place in the models? We evaluated models according to four best practices for simulation, leading to nuanced findings that, despite their current limitations, the current simulation models are powerful tools for understanding the complexity of suicide and evaluating suicide prevention interventions. 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10588059/ /pubmed/37869477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers12070132 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schuerkamp, Ryan
Liang, Luke
Rice, Ketra L.
Giabbanelli, Philippe J.
Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
title Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
title_full Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
title_fullStr Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
title_full_unstemmed Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
title_short Simulation Models for Suicide Prevention: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art
title_sort simulation models for suicide prevention: a survey of the state-of-the-art
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers12070132
work_keys_str_mv AT schuerkampryan simulationmodelsforsuicidepreventionasurveyofthestateoftheart
AT liangluke simulationmodelsforsuicidepreventionasurveyofthestateoftheart
AT riceketral simulationmodelsforsuicidepreventionasurveyofthestateoftheart
AT giabbanelliphilippej simulationmodelsforsuicidepreventionasurveyofthestateoftheart