Cargando…
Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ)
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of diabetes knowledge plays a pivotal role in identifying and addressing patients’ knowledge gaps. The implementation of a standardized diabetes knowledge assessment tool is important to ensure consistent scoring and facilitating the development of effective and standardized e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00631-3 |
_version_ | 1785123511156604928 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Phei Ching Rajah, Retha Lim, Yen Li Kam, Jason Lye Hin Wong, Te Ying Krishnanmurthi, Vivegananth Chang, Chee Tao Cheah, Mun Teng Kamaruzzaman, Nur Dayana Tan, Wee Toong Lee, Eng Seng Zainal, Hadzliana |
author_facet | Lim, Phei Ching Rajah, Retha Lim, Yen Li Kam, Jason Lye Hin Wong, Te Ying Krishnanmurthi, Vivegananth Chang, Chee Tao Cheah, Mun Teng Kamaruzzaman, Nur Dayana Tan, Wee Toong Lee, Eng Seng Zainal, Hadzliana |
author_sort | Lim, Phei Ching |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of diabetes knowledge plays a pivotal role in identifying and addressing patients’ knowledge gaps. The implementation of a standardized diabetes knowledge assessment tool is important to ensure consistent scoring and facilitating the development of effective and standardized education programs. AIM: To develop and validate a patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) to assess knowledge of diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: The development of the PDKQ questionnaire involved three phases: item development, content validation, and reliability testing. In the item development phase, the initial draft of the PDKQ, comprising a multiple-choice answer questionnaire was developed. The content validation phase comprised two stages. Firstly, ten experts participated in the expert validation process, followed by face validation involving six patients. In the final phase, test–retest analysis was performed among diabetes mellitus patients to assess reliability. RESULTS: The first draft of PDKQ consisted of 11 patient characteristics items and 37 items of multiple choices questions. During the expert validation, three items were eliminated due to low clarity, and an additional six items were removed as they were deemed irrelevant or unimportant. During the face validation, three patients' characteristic items and eight multiple-choice questions were excluded due to a content validity index of less than 0.83. In the test–retest phase, 36 subjects responded to 8 items pertaining to patients' characteristics and 20 multiple-choice questions. The test–retest analysis yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88, indicating good reliability. CONCLUSION: The 20-item PDKQ is a reliable and robust tool in assessing the knowledge of diabetes mellitus patients in Malaysia. Its implementation allows standardized assessment of diabetic patients' knowledge levels, enabling targeted interventions to empower patients and optimize diabetes care practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10588117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105881172023-10-21 Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) Lim, Phei Ching Rajah, Retha Lim, Yen Li Kam, Jason Lye Hin Wong, Te Ying Krishnanmurthi, Vivegananth Chang, Chee Tao Cheah, Mun Teng Kamaruzzaman, Nur Dayana Tan, Wee Toong Lee, Eng Seng Zainal, Hadzliana J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: Evaluation of diabetes knowledge plays a pivotal role in identifying and addressing patients’ knowledge gaps. The implementation of a standardized diabetes knowledge assessment tool is important to ensure consistent scoring and facilitating the development of effective and standardized education programs. AIM: To develop and validate a patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) to assess knowledge of diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: The development of the PDKQ questionnaire involved three phases: item development, content validation, and reliability testing. In the item development phase, the initial draft of the PDKQ, comprising a multiple-choice answer questionnaire was developed. The content validation phase comprised two stages. Firstly, ten experts participated in the expert validation process, followed by face validation involving six patients. In the final phase, test–retest analysis was performed among diabetes mellitus patients to assess reliability. RESULTS: The first draft of PDKQ consisted of 11 patient characteristics items and 37 items of multiple choices questions. During the expert validation, three items were eliminated due to low clarity, and an additional six items were removed as they were deemed irrelevant or unimportant. During the face validation, three patients' characteristic items and eight multiple-choice questions were excluded due to a content validity index of less than 0.83. In the test–retest phase, 36 subjects responded to 8 items pertaining to patients' characteristics and 20 multiple-choice questions. The test–retest analysis yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88, indicating good reliability. CONCLUSION: The 20-item PDKQ is a reliable and robust tool in assessing the knowledge of diabetes mellitus patients in Malaysia. Its implementation allows standardized assessment of diabetic patients' knowledge levels, enabling targeted interventions to empower patients and optimize diabetes care practices. BioMed Central 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10588117/ /pubmed/37858279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00631-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lim, Phei Ching Rajah, Retha Lim, Yen Li Kam, Jason Lye Hin Wong, Te Ying Krishnanmurthi, Vivegananth Chang, Chee Tao Cheah, Mun Teng Kamaruzzaman, Nur Dayana Tan, Wee Toong Lee, Eng Seng Zainal, Hadzliana Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) |
title | Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) |
title_full | Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) |
title_short | Development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (PDKQ) |
title_sort | development and validation of patient diabetes knowledge questionnaire (pdkq) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00631-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limpheiching developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT rajahretha developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT limyenli developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT kamjasonlyehin developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT wongteying developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT krishnanmurthivivegananth developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT changcheetao developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT cheahmunteng developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT kamaruzzamannurdayana developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT tanweetoong developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT leeengseng developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq AT zainalhadzliana developmentandvalidationofpatientdiabetesknowledgequestionnairepdkq |