Cargando…

Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without indu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haney, Ailís Ceara, Salatzki, Janek, Hund, Hauke, Friedrich, Matthias G., Giannitsis, Evangelos, Frey, Norbert, Steen, Henning, Loßnitzer, Dirk, Riffel, Johannes, André, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374
_version_ 1785123524882464768
author Haney, Ailís Ceara
Salatzki, Janek
Hund, Hauke
Friedrich, Matthias G.
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Frey, Norbert
Steen, Henning
Loßnitzer, Dirk
Riffel, Johannes
André, Florian
author_facet Haney, Ailís Ceara
Salatzki, Janek
Hund, Hauke
Friedrich, Matthias G.
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Frey, Norbert
Steen, Henning
Loßnitzer, Dirk
Riffel, Johannes
André, Florian
author_sort Haney, Ailís Ceara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without inducible ischemia using stress CMR remains uncertain, even though its identification of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is excellent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without inducible ischemia and known CAD who underwent stress CMR between February 2015 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into two groups: group 1 with stenosis of 50%–75% and group 2 with stenosis of >75%. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. RESULTS: Real-world data collected from 169 patients with a median age of 69 (60–75) years were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 (IQR 4.1–6.6) years. Events occurred after a mean time of 3.0 ± 2.2 years in group 1 and 3.7 ± 2.0 years in group 2 (p = 0.35). Sixteen (18.8%) patients in group 1 and 23 (27.4%) patients in group 2 suffered from MACE without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.33). In group 2, one cardiac death (1.2%), seven non-fatal MI (8.3%), 15 PCI (17.9%), and one CABG (1.2%) occurred. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot study suggest that long-term outcomes in a real-world patient cohort with known severe and moderate coronary artery stenosis but without inducible ischemia were similar. Stress CMR may provide valuable risk stratification in patients with angiographically significant but hemodynamically non-obstructive coronary lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105881782023-10-21 Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis Haney, Ailís Ceara Salatzki, Janek Hund, Hauke Friedrich, Matthias G. Giannitsis, Evangelos Frey, Norbert Steen, Henning Loßnitzer, Dirk Riffel, Johannes André, Florian Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without inducible ischemia using stress CMR remains uncertain, even though its identification of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is excellent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without inducible ischemia and known CAD who underwent stress CMR between February 2015 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into two groups: group 1 with stenosis of 50%–75% and group 2 with stenosis of >75%. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. RESULTS: Real-world data collected from 169 patients with a median age of 69 (60–75) years were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 (IQR 4.1–6.6) years. Events occurred after a mean time of 3.0 ± 2.2 years in group 1 and 3.7 ± 2.0 years in group 2 (p = 0.35). Sixteen (18.8%) patients in group 1 and 23 (27.4%) patients in group 2 suffered from MACE without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.33). In group 2, one cardiac death (1.2%), seven non-fatal MI (8.3%), 15 PCI (17.9%), and one CABG (1.2%) occurred. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot study suggest that long-term outcomes in a real-world patient cohort with known severe and moderate coronary artery stenosis but without inducible ischemia were similar. Stress CMR may provide valuable risk stratification in patients with angiographically significant but hemodynamically non-obstructive coronary lesions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10588178/ /pubmed/37868771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374 Text en © 2023 Haney, Salatzki, Hund, Friedrich, Giannitsis, Frey, Steen, Loßnitzer, Riffel and Andre. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Haney, Ailís Ceara
Salatzki, Janek
Hund, Hauke
Friedrich, Matthias G.
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Frey, Norbert
Steen, Henning
Loßnitzer, Dirk
Riffel, Johannes
André, Florian
Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
title Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
title_full Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
title_fullStr Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
title_short Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
title_sort prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374
work_keys_str_mv AT haneyailisceara prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT salatzkijanek prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT hundhauke prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT friedrichmatthiasg prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT giannitsisevangelos prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT freynorbert prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT steenhenning prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT loßnitzerdirk prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT riffeljohannes prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis
AT andreflorian prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis