Cargando…
Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without indu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374 |
_version_ | 1785123524882464768 |
---|---|
author | Haney, Ailís Ceara Salatzki, Janek Hund, Hauke Friedrich, Matthias G. Giannitsis, Evangelos Frey, Norbert Steen, Henning Loßnitzer, Dirk Riffel, Johannes André, Florian |
author_facet | Haney, Ailís Ceara Salatzki, Janek Hund, Hauke Friedrich, Matthias G. Giannitsis, Evangelos Frey, Norbert Steen, Henning Loßnitzer, Dirk Riffel, Johannes André, Florian |
author_sort | Haney, Ailís Ceara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without inducible ischemia using stress CMR remains uncertain, even though its identification of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is excellent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without inducible ischemia and known CAD who underwent stress CMR between February 2015 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into two groups: group 1 with stenosis of 50%–75% and group 2 with stenosis of >75%. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. RESULTS: Real-world data collected from 169 patients with a median age of 69 (60–75) years were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 (IQR 4.1–6.6) years. Events occurred after a mean time of 3.0 ± 2.2 years in group 1 and 3.7 ± 2.0 years in group 2 (p = 0.35). Sixteen (18.8%) patients in group 1 and 23 (27.4%) patients in group 2 suffered from MACE without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.33). In group 2, one cardiac death (1.2%), seven non-fatal MI (8.3%), 15 PCI (17.9%), and one CABG (1.2%) occurred. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot study suggest that long-term outcomes in a real-world patient cohort with known severe and moderate coronary artery stenosis but without inducible ischemia were similar. Stress CMR may provide valuable risk stratification in patients with angiographically significant but hemodynamically non-obstructive coronary lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10588178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105881782023-10-21 Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis Haney, Ailís Ceara Salatzki, Janek Hund, Hauke Friedrich, Matthias G. Giannitsis, Evangelos Frey, Norbert Steen, Henning Loßnitzer, Dirk Riffel, Johannes André, Florian Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) without inducible ischemia in a real-world cohort of patients with known severe coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis and without inducible ischemia using stress CMR remains uncertain, even though its identification of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is excellent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without inducible ischemia and known CAD who underwent stress CMR between February 2015 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. These patients were divided into two groups: group 1 with stenosis of 50%–75% and group 2 with stenosis of >75%. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. RESULTS: Real-world data collected from 169 patients with a median age of 69 (60–75) years were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 (IQR 4.1–6.6) years. Events occurred after a mean time of 3.0 ± 2.2 years in group 1 and 3.7 ± 2.0 years in group 2 (p = 0.35). Sixteen (18.8%) patients in group 1 and 23 (27.4%) patients in group 2 suffered from MACE without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.33). In group 2, one cardiac death (1.2%), seven non-fatal MI (8.3%), 15 PCI (17.9%), and one CABG (1.2%) occurred. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot study suggest that long-term outcomes in a real-world patient cohort with known severe and moderate coronary artery stenosis but without inducible ischemia were similar. Stress CMR may provide valuable risk stratification in patients with angiographically significant but hemodynamically non-obstructive coronary lesions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10588178/ /pubmed/37868771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374 Text en © 2023 Haney, Salatzki, Hund, Friedrich, Giannitsis, Frey, Steen, Loßnitzer, Riffel and Andre. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Haney, Ailís Ceara Salatzki, Janek Hund, Hauke Friedrich, Matthias G. Giannitsis, Evangelos Frey, Norbert Steen, Henning Loßnitzer, Dirk Riffel, Johannes André, Florian Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
title | Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
title_full | Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
title_short | Prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
title_sort | prognostic value of negative stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moderate-severe coronary artery stenosis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1264374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haneyailisceara prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT salatzkijanek prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT hundhauke prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT friedrichmatthiasg prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT giannitsisevangelos prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT freynorbert prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT steenhenning prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT loßnitzerdirk prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT riffeljohannes prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis AT andreflorian prognosticvalueofnegativestresscardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithmoderateseverecoronaryarterystenosis |