Cargando…

Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus

This study was aimed at investigating the effect of sinus removal combined with vacuum‐assisted closure in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. From January 2019 to May 2022, 62 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated and their information was collected at our hospital....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiao, Zhao, Xiaoyu, Shen, Guoliang, Fan, Shuwen, Xu, Jun, Fan, Zhaojun, Li, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14218
_version_ 1785123565316603904
author Liu, Xiao
Zhao, Xiaoyu
Shen, Guoliang
Fan, Shuwen
Xu, Jun
Fan, Zhaojun
Li, Ke
author_facet Liu, Xiao
Zhao, Xiaoyu
Shen, Guoliang
Fan, Shuwen
Xu, Jun
Fan, Zhaojun
Li, Ke
author_sort Liu, Xiao
collection PubMed
description This study was aimed at investigating the effect of sinus removal combined with vacuum‐assisted closure in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. From January 2019 to May 2022, 62 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated and their information was collected at our hospital. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: an observation group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 30). The control group underwent a simple sinus resection and suture, while the observation group received a sinus resection combined with closed negative pressure drainage of the wound. A retrospective analysis of the data obtained was conducted. Perioperative indicators, clinical efficacy, postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic effects, and satisfaction scores at six months after the operation were compared between the two groups, and the recurrence rate at six months after the operation was recorded. Through this study, we found that the observation group had significantly shorter surgery time, hospital stay, and return time compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group had a higher overall recurrence rate (ORR) of 100.00%, which was significantly better than the control group's ORR of 86.67% (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) score at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation was significantly lower in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05), the observation group had decreased white blood cell, neutrophil, and C‐reactive protein levels after the operation. Moreover, the total occurrence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower (6.25%) than that of the control group (26.67%; P < 0.05). The observation group also had significantly lower scores on the postoperative scar scale and higher satisfaction scores than the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Our study demonstrated that sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure was more effective in treating sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus compared with simple sinus resection and suture. This approach significantly reduced surgery time, hospital stay, and return time. It also effectively relieved postoperative pain, reduced the occurrence of postoperative complications, resulted in smaller postoperative scars, and yielded better aesthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105883582023-10-21 Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus Liu, Xiao Zhao, Xiaoyu Shen, Guoliang Fan, Shuwen Xu, Jun Fan, Zhaojun Li, Ke Int Wound J Original Articles This study was aimed at investigating the effect of sinus removal combined with vacuum‐assisted closure in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. From January 2019 to May 2022, 62 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated and their information was collected at our hospital. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: an observation group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 30). The control group underwent a simple sinus resection and suture, while the observation group received a sinus resection combined with closed negative pressure drainage of the wound. A retrospective analysis of the data obtained was conducted. Perioperative indicators, clinical efficacy, postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic effects, and satisfaction scores at six months after the operation were compared between the two groups, and the recurrence rate at six months after the operation was recorded. Through this study, we found that the observation group had significantly shorter surgery time, hospital stay, and return time compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group had a higher overall recurrence rate (ORR) of 100.00%, which was significantly better than the control group's ORR of 86.67% (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) score at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation was significantly lower in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05), the observation group had decreased white blood cell, neutrophil, and C‐reactive protein levels after the operation. Moreover, the total occurrence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower (6.25%) than that of the control group (26.67%; P < 0.05). The observation group also had significantly lower scores on the postoperative scar scale and higher satisfaction scores than the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Our study demonstrated that sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure was more effective in treating sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus compared with simple sinus resection and suture. This approach significantly reduced surgery time, hospital stay, and return time. It also effectively relieved postoperative pain, reduced the occurrence of postoperative complications, resulted in smaller postoperative scars, and yielded better aesthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10588358/ /pubmed/37218401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14218 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Liu, Xiao
Zhao, Xiaoyu
Shen, Guoliang
Fan, Shuwen
Xu, Jun
Fan, Zhaojun
Li, Ke
Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_full Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_fullStr Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_full_unstemmed Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_short Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
title_sort effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum‐assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14218
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiao effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT zhaoxiaoyu effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT shenguoliang effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT fanshuwen effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT xujun effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT fanzhaojun effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus
AT like effectofsinusresectioncombinedwithvacuumassistedclosureonsacrococcygealpilonidalsinus