Cargando…
AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
In this study, we aimed to compare supraglottic airway devices (Supreme and i-gel laryngeal mask) with tracheal tube with respect to airway control and efficiency in ventilation and oxygenation. The study included 325 patients of ASA I-II who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group 1, the a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868185 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.01 |
_version_ | 1785123569880006656 |
---|---|
author | Videnović, Nebojša Mladenović, Jovan Trpković, Slađana Pavlović, Aleksandar Filipović, Milan Mladenović, Raša Mladenović, Saša |
author_facet | Videnović, Nebojša Mladenović, Jovan Trpković, Slađana Pavlović, Aleksandar Filipović, Milan Mladenović, Raša Mladenović, Saša |
author_sort | Videnović, Nebojša |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we aimed to compare supraglottic airway devices (Supreme and i-gel laryngeal mask) with tracheal tube with respect to airway control and efficiency in ventilation and oxygenation. The study included 325 patients of ASA I-II who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group 1, the airway was secured using endotracheal intubation (115 patients). In group 2 (103 patients), LMA Supreme was applied, whereas i-gel mask was used for airway management in group 3 (107 patients). Monitoring parameters were recorded and compared using t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test and χ2-test. The following parameters were monitored: insertion time, number of attempts for device placement, oropharyngeal seal pressure, etc. Insertion time was longest in group 1 (14.7±1.65 s) as compared to group 2 (15.5±1.05 s) and group 3 (14.1±1.27 s); ANOVA test yielded a statistically significant difference (p<0.01). Insertion success rate was almost identical in all three groups (p=0.907, χ2-test). Comparison of oropharyngeal seal pressure between group 2 (35.95±2.92 cm H2O) and group 3 (36.47±1.43 cm H(2)O) yielded no statistical difference (p=0.314, t-test). Endotracheal tube, Supreme and i-gel laryngeal masks were shown to be equally efficient in airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All three devices enabled efficient ventilation and oxygenation despite certain pathophysiological changes associated with laparoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10588377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105883772023-10-21 AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Videnović, Nebojša Mladenović, Jovan Trpković, Slađana Pavlović, Aleksandar Filipović, Milan Mladenović, Raša Mladenović, Saša Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers In this study, we aimed to compare supraglottic airway devices (Supreme and i-gel laryngeal mask) with tracheal tube with respect to airway control and efficiency in ventilation and oxygenation. The study included 325 patients of ASA I-II who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group 1, the airway was secured using endotracheal intubation (115 patients). In group 2 (103 patients), LMA Supreme was applied, whereas i-gel mask was used for airway management in group 3 (107 patients). Monitoring parameters were recorded and compared using t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test and χ2-test. The following parameters were monitored: insertion time, number of attempts for device placement, oropharyngeal seal pressure, etc. Insertion time was longest in group 1 (14.7±1.65 s) as compared to group 2 (15.5±1.05 s) and group 3 (14.1±1.27 s); ANOVA test yielded a statistically significant difference (p<0.01). Insertion success rate was almost identical in all three groups (p=0.907, χ2-test). Comparison of oropharyngeal seal pressure between group 2 (35.95±2.92 cm H2O) and group 3 (36.47±1.43 cm H(2)O) yielded no statistical difference (p=0.314, t-test). Endotracheal tube, Supreme and i-gel laryngeal masks were shown to be equally efficient in airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All three devices enabled efficient ventilation and oxygenation despite certain pathophysiological changes associated with laparoscopy. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10588377/ /pubmed/37868185 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.01 Text en Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Papers Videnović, Nebojša Mladenović, Jovan Trpković, Slađana Pavlović, Aleksandar Filipović, Milan Mladenović, Raša Mladenović, Saša AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title | AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_full | AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr | AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed | AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_short | AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
title_sort | airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy – a comparative analysis |
topic | Original Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868185 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.01 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT videnovicnebojsa airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis AT mladenovicjovan airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis AT trpkovicslađana airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis AT pavlovicaleksandar airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis AT filipovicmilan airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis AT mladenovicrasa airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis AT mladenovicsasa airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis |