Cargando…

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

In this study, we aimed to compare supraglottic airway devices (Supreme and i-gel laryngeal mask) with tracheal tube with respect to airway control and efficiency in ventilation and oxygenation. The study included 325 patients of ASA I-II who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group 1, the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Videnović, Nebojša, Mladenović, Jovan, Trpković, Slađana, Pavlović, Aleksandar, Filipović, Milan, Mladenović, Raša, Mladenović, Saša
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868185
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.01
_version_ 1785123569880006656
author Videnović, Nebojša
Mladenović, Jovan
Trpković, Slađana
Pavlović, Aleksandar
Filipović, Milan
Mladenović, Raša
Mladenović, Saša
author_facet Videnović, Nebojša
Mladenović, Jovan
Trpković, Slađana
Pavlović, Aleksandar
Filipović, Milan
Mladenović, Raša
Mladenović, Saša
author_sort Videnović, Nebojša
collection PubMed
description In this study, we aimed to compare supraglottic airway devices (Supreme and i-gel laryngeal mask) with tracheal tube with respect to airway control and efficiency in ventilation and oxygenation. The study included 325 patients of ASA I-II who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group 1, the airway was secured using endotracheal intubation (115 patients). In group 2 (103 patients), LMA Supreme was applied, whereas i-gel mask was used for airway management in group 3 (107 patients). Monitoring parameters were recorded and compared using t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test and χ2-test. The following parameters were monitored: insertion time, number of attempts for device placement, oropharyngeal seal pressure, etc. Insertion time was longest in group 1 (14.7±1.65 s) as compared to group 2 (15.5±1.05 s) and group 3 (14.1±1.27 s); ANOVA test yielded a statistically significant difference (p<0.01). Insertion success rate was almost identical in all three groups (p=0.907, χ2-test). Comparison of oropharyngeal seal pressure between group 2 (35.95±2.92 cm H2O) and group 3 (36.47±1.43 cm H(2)O) yielded no statistical difference (p=0.314, t-test). Endotracheal tube, Supreme and i-gel laryngeal masks were shown to be equally efficient in airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All three devices enabled efficient ventilation and oxygenation despite certain pathophysiological changes associated with laparoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105883772023-10-21 AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Videnović, Nebojša Mladenović, Jovan Trpković, Slađana Pavlović, Aleksandar Filipović, Milan Mladenović, Raša Mladenović, Saša Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers In this study, we aimed to compare supraglottic airway devices (Supreme and i-gel laryngeal mask) with tracheal tube with respect to airway control and efficiency in ventilation and oxygenation. The study included 325 patients of ASA I-II who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In group 1, the airway was secured using endotracheal intubation (115 patients). In group 2 (103 patients), LMA Supreme was applied, whereas i-gel mask was used for airway management in group 3 (107 patients). Monitoring parameters were recorded and compared using t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test and χ2-test. The following parameters were monitored: insertion time, number of attempts for device placement, oropharyngeal seal pressure, etc. Insertion time was longest in group 1 (14.7±1.65 s) as compared to group 2 (15.5±1.05 s) and group 3 (14.1±1.27 s); ANOVA test yielded a statistically significant difference (p<0.01). Insertion success rate was almost identical in all three groups (p=0.907, χ2-test). Comparison of oropharyngeal seal pressure between group 2 (35.95±2.92 cm H2O) and group 3 (36.47±1.43 cm H(2)O) yielded no statistical difference (p=0.314, t-test). Endotracheal tube, Supreme and i-gel laryngeal masks were shown to be equally efficient in airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All three devices enabled efficient ventilation and oxygenation despite certain pathophysiological changes associated with laparoscopy. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10588377/ /pubmed/37868185 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.01 Text en Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Videnović, Nebojša
Mladenović, Jovan
Trpković, Slađana
Pavlović, Aleksandar
Filipović, Milan
Mladenović, Raša
Mladenović, Saša
AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_fullStr AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_short AIRWAY MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_sort airway management in laparoscopic cholecystectomy – a comparative analysis
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868185
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.01
work_keys_str_mv AT videnovicnebojsa airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis
AT mladenovicjovan airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis
AT trpkovicslađana airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis
AT pavlovicaleksandar airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis
AT filipovicmilan airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis
AT mladenovicrasa airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis
AT mladenovicsasa airwaymanagementinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyacomparativeanalysis