Cargando…

COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY

This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duran, Mehmet, Kuşderci, Hatice, Uludağ, Öznur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868184
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07
_version_ 1785123574375251968
author Duran, Mehmet
Kuşderci, Hatice
Uludağ, Öznur
author_facet Duran, Mehmet
Kuşderci, Hatice
Uludağ, Öznur
author_sort Duran, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO(2), EtCO(2), airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p<0.001 both). The airway pressure measurements at 5-min intervals were significantly lower in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (p<0.001). F-LMA may be a useful alternative to ETT for adenotonsillectomy surgery because it is safe, provides shorter induction and recovery times, reduces intraoperative airway pressure, and provides an adequate operative field of view.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105883962023-10-21 COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY Duran, Mehmet Kuşderci, Hatice Uludağ, Öznur Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers This study compared the effectiveness of flexible laryngeal mask (F-LMA) insertion and endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. A total of 60 patients aged 2-12 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into the F-LMA group (n=30) and endotracheal tube (ETT) group (n=30). The groups were compared according to intubation time, heart rate, SpO(2), EtCO(2), airway pressure, surgical field of view, and recovery time. Both the insertion time and recovery time were shorter in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (16.93±4.84 s vs. 23.93±8.74 s; and 10±2 min vs. 14.5±3 min; p<0.001 both). The airway pressure measurements at 5-min intervals were significantly lower in the F-LMA group than in the ETT group (p<0.001). F-LMA may be a useful alternative to ETT for adenotonsillectomy surgery because it is safe, provides shorter induction and recovery times, reduces intraoperative airway pressure, and provides an adequate operative field of view. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10588396/ /pubmed/37868184 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07 Text en Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Duran, Mehmet
Kuşderci, Hatice
Uludağ, Öznur
COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY
title COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY
title_full COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY
title_short COMPARISON OF FLEXIBLE LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADENOTONSILLECTOMY SURGERY
title_sort comparison of flexible laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation in adenotonsillectomy surgery
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868184
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.07
work_keys_str_mv AT duranmehmet comparisonofflexiblelaryngealmaskinsertionandendotrachealintubationinadenotonsillectomysurgery
AT kusdercihatice comparisonofflexiblelaryngealmaskinsertionandendotrachealintubationinadenotonsillectomysurgery
AT uludagoznur comparisonofflexiblelaryngealmaskinsertionandendotrachealintubationinadenotonsillectomysurgery