Cargando…

Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of blood coagulation is essential in ECMO patients. We investigated the prevalence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) and its association with coagulation testing and hemostaseologic complications in patients treated with ECMO. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis including adul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornfehl, Andrea, Brock, Roman, Staudinger, Thomas, Schellongowski, Peter, Nagler, Bernhard, Hermann, Alexander, Robak, Oliver, Schwameis, Michael, Quehenberger, Peter, Buchtele, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231207062
_version_ 1785123575316873216
author Kornfehl, Andrea
Brock, Roman
Staudinger, Thomas
Schellongowski, Peter
Nagler, Bernhard
Hermann, Alexander
Robak, Oliver
Schwameis, Michael
Quehenberger, Peter
Buchtele, Nina
author_facet Kornfehl, Andrea
Brock, Roman
Staudinger, Thomas
Schellongowski, Peter
Nagler, Bernhard
Hermann, Alexander
Robak, Oliver
Schwameis, Michael
Quehenberger, Peter
Buchtele, Nina
author_sort Kornfehl, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monitoring of blood coagulation is essential in ECMO patients. We investigated the prevalence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) and its association with coagulation testing and hemostaseologic complications in patients treated with ECMO. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis including adult patients who received ECMO at a medical intensive care unit at the Medical University of Vienna. The primary outcome was the prevalence of LA. Secondary outcomes included conditions associated with LA positivity, rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events, as well as the proportions of aPTT and antiXa measurements within the target range. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2021 193 patients received ECMO, in 62 (32%) of whom LA diagnostics were performed. Twenty-two (35%) patients tested positive. LA positive patients had more frequently received VV ECMO (77.3% vs 34.3%; p = 0.002), were more frequently diagnosed with viral respiratory infections (SARS-CoV2: 45.5% vs 20%; p = 0.041, influenza virus: 22.7% vs 0%; p = 0.003), had a longer ECMO treatment duration (25 vs 10 days; p = 0.011) and a longer ICU stay (48 vs 25 days; p = 0.022), but similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105884002023-10-21 Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Kornfehl, Andrea Brock, Roman Staudinger, Thomas Schellongowski, Peter Nagler, Bernhard Hermann, Alexander Robak, Oliver Schwameis, Michael Quehenberger, Peter Buchtele, Nina Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Manuscript BACKGROUND: Monitoring of blood coagulation is essential in ECMO patients. We investigated the prevalence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) and its association with coagulation testing and hemostaseologic complications in patients treated with ECMO. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis including adult patients who received ECMO at a medical intensive care unit at the Medical University of Vienna. The primary outcome was the prevalence of LA. Secondary outcomes included conditions associated with LA positivity, rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events, as well as the proportions of aPTT and antiXa measurements within the target range. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2021 193 patients received ECMO, in 62 (32%) of whom LA diagnostics were performed. Twenty-two (35%) patients tested positive. LA positive patients had more frequently received VV ECMO (77.3% vs 34.3%; p = 0.002), were more frequently diagnosed with viral respiratory infections (SARS-CoV2: 45.5% vs 20%; p = 0.041, influenza virus: 22.7% vs 0%; p = 0.003), had a longer ECMO treatment duration (25 vs 10 days; p = 0.011) and a longer ICU stay (48 vs 25 days; p = 0.022), but similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events. SAGE Publications 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10588400/ /pubmed/37853541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231207062 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Kornfehl, Andrea
Brock, Roman
Staudinger, Thomas
Schellongowski, Peter
Nagler, Bernhard
Hermann, Alexander
Robak, Oliver
Schwameis, Michael
Quehenberger, Peter
Buchtele, Nina
Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
title Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
title_full Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
title_fullStr Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
title_short Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
title_sort prevalence and impact of lupus anticoagulant in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231207062
work_keys_str_mv AT kornfehlandrea prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT brockroman prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT staudingerthomas prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT schellongowskipeter prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT naglerbernhard prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT hermannalexander prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT robakoliver prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT schwameismichael prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT quehenbergerpeter prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT buchtelenina prevalenceandimpactoflupusanticoagulantinpatientsreceivingextracorporealmembraneoxygenation