Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869579 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798 |
_version_ | 1785123594825629696 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Dingwei Fernandes, Joaquim Kim, Han Coetzer, Henriette |
author_facet | Dai, Dingwei Fernandes, Joaquim Kim, Han Coetzer, Henriette |
author_sort | Dai, Dingwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential tremor (ET), but evidence supporting therapeutic benefits of TAPS versus standard of care (SOC) is lacking. This randomized prospective study evaluated the clinical benefit of adding TAPS treatment to SOC versus SOC alone. METHODS: This randomized pragmatic trial recruited patients from a large health plan’s Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage population. All 310 patients received a TAPS device and were randomized 1:1 to either one month adding TAPS therapy to usual care (TX arm) or usual care with tremor assessment only (SOC arm). The pre-specified endpoints were changes in tremor power measured by motion sensors on the device (primary) and improvement in Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper limb scores (secondary) between TX and SOC in all patients who completed the one-month study. RESULTS: 276 patients completed the one-month study (N = 133 TX, N = 143 SOC). The study met the primary and secondary endpoints, with significantly reduced tremor power in TX compared with SOC (0.017 (0.003) versus 0.08 (0.014) (m/s(2))(2); geometric mean (SE); p < 0.0001) and greater improvement in the BF-ADL score in TX than SOC (1.6 (0.43) vs 0.2 (0.37) points; mean (SE); p < 0.05). No serious device-related adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: This trial demonstrates that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADLs in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. HIGHLIGHTS: This study found that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADL scores in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. This real-world evidence study suggests that non-invasive TAPS therapy is a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with ET. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10588491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105884912023-10-21 Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial Dai, Dingwei Fernandes, Joaquim Kim, Han Coetzer, Henriette Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Article BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential tremor (ET), but evidence supporting therapeutic benefits of TAPS versus standard of care (SOC) is lacking. This randomized prospective study evaluated the clinical benefit of adding TAPS treatment to SOC versus SOC alone. METHODS: This randomized pragmatic trial recruited patients from a large health plan’s Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage population. All 310 patients received a TAPS device and were randomized 1:1 to either one month adding TAPS therapy to usual care (TX arm) or usual care with tremor assessment only (SOC arm). The pre-specified endpoints were changes in tremor power measured by motion sensors on the device (primary) and improvement in Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper limb scores (secondary) between TX and SOC in all patients who completed the one-month study. RESULTS: 276 patients completed the one-month study (N = 133 TX, N = 143 SOC). The study met the primary and secondary endpoints, with significantly reduced tremor power in TX compared with SOC (0.017 (0.003) versus 0.08 (0.014) (m/s(2))(2); geometric mean (SE); p < 0.0001) and greater improvement in the BF-ADL score in TX than SOC (1.6 (0.43) vs 0.2 (0.37) points; mean (SE); p < 0.05). No serious device-related adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: This trial demonstrates that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADLs in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. HIGHLIGHTS: This study found that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADL scores in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. This real-world evidence study suggests that non-invasive TAPS therapy is a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with ET. Ubiquity Press 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10588491/ /pubmed/37869579 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Dai, Dingwei Fernandes, Joaquim Kim, Han Coetzer, Henriette Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation therapy for essential tremor: a randomized pragmatic clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869579 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daidingwei comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial AT fernandesjoaquim comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial AT kimhan comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial AT coetzerhenriette comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial |