Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Dingwei, Fernandes, Joaquim, Kim, Han, Coetzer, Henriette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869579
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798
_version_ 1785123594825629696
author Dai, Dingwei
Fernandes, Joaquim
Kim, Han
Coetzer, Henriette
author_facet Dai, Dingwei
Fernandes, Joaquim
Kim, Han
Coetzer, Henriette
author_sort Dai, Dingwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential tremor (ET), but evidence supporting therapeutic benefits of TAPS versus standard of care (SOC) is lacking. This randomized prospective study evaluated the clinical benefit of adding TAPS treatment to SOC versus SOC alone. METHODS: This randomized pragmatic trial recruited patients from a large health plan’s Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage population. All 310 patients received a TAPS device and were randomized 1:1 to either one month adding TAPS therapy to usual care (TX arm) or usual care with tremor assessment only (SOC arm). The pre-specified endpoints were changes in tremor power measured by motion sensors on the device (primary) and improvement in Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper limb scores (secondary) between TX and SOC in all patients who completed the one-month study. RESULTS: 276 patients completed the one-month study (N = 133 TX, N = 143 SOC). The study met the primary and secondary endpoints, with significantly reduced tremor power in TX compared with SOC (0.017 (0.003) versus 0.08 (0.014) (m/s(2))(2); geometric mean (SE); p < 0.0001) and greater improvement in the BF-ADL score in TX than SOC (1.6 (0.43) vs 0.2 (0.37) points; mean (SE); p < 0.05). No serious device-related adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: This trial demonstrates that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADLs in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. HIGHLIGHTS: This study found that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADL scores in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. This real-world evidence study suggests that non-invasive TAPS therapy is a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with ET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105884912023-10-21 Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial Dai, Dingwei Fernandes, Joaquim Kim, Han Coetzer, Henriette Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Article BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential tremor (ET), but evidence supporting therapeutic benefits of TAPS versus standard of care (SOC) is lacking. This randomized prospective study evaluated the clinical benefit of adding TAPS treatment to SOC versus SOC alone. METHODS: This randomized pragmatic trial recruited patients from a large health plan’s Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage population. All 310 patients received a TAPS device and were randomized 1:1 to either one month adding TAPS therapy to usual care (TX arm) or usual care with tremor assessment only (SOC arm). The pre-specified endpoints were changes in tremor power measured by motion sensors on the device (primary) and improvement in Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper limb scores (secondary) between TX and SOC in all patients who completed the one-month study. RESULTS: 276 patients completed the one-month study (N = 133 TX, N = 143 SOC). The study met the primary and secondary endpoints, with significantly reduced tremor power in TX compared with SOC (0.017 (0.003) versus 0.08 (0.014) (m/s(2))(2); geometric mean (SE); p < 0.0001) and greater improvement in the BF-ADL score in TX than SOC (1.6 (0.43) vs 0.2 (0.37) points; mean (SE); p < 0.05). No serious device-related adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: This trial demonstrates that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADLs in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. HIGHLIGHTS: This study found that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADL scores in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. This real-world evidence study suggests that non-invasive TAPS therapy is a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with ET. Ubiquity Press 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10588491/ /pubmed/37869579 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Dai, Dingwei
Fernandes, Joaquim
Kim, Han
Coetzer, Henriette
Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
title Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial
title_sort comparative effectiveness of transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation therapy for essential tremor: a randomized pragmatic clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37869579
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798
work_keys_str_mv AT daidingwei comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial
AT fernandesjoaquim comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial
AT kimhan comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial
AT coetzerhenriette comparativeeffectivenessoftranscutaneousafferentpatternedstimulationtherapyforessentialtremorarandomizedpragmaticclinicaltrial