Cargando…

Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis

BACKGROUND: Despite medical progress, mortality from gastrointestinal perforation was relatively high. Our study’s objective was to identify risk factors associated with a poor prognosis for gastrointestinal perforation. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal perforation at the Longchuan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Wenqing, Zhou, Xiaozhuan, Cai, Zhigao, Qiu, Junyu, Li, Xi, Tong, Gangling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868819
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S426676
_version_ 1785123647464144896
author Yuan, Wenqing
Zhou, Xiaozhuan
Cai, Zhigao
Qiu, Junyu
Li, Xi
Tong, Gangling
author_facet Yuan, Wenqing
Zhou, Xiaozhuan
Cai, Zhigao
Qiu, Junyu
Li, Xi
Tong, Gangling
author_sort Yuan, Wenqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite medical progress, mortality from gastrointestinal perforation was relatively high. Our study’s objective was to identify risk factors associated with a poor prognosis for gastrointestinal perforation. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal perforation at the Longchuan County People’s Hospital between January 2019 and February 2022 were the subject of a retrospective analysis of their laboratory data. Patients were grouped based on length of hospital stay, septic shock, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients participated in our study. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we identified several risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation associated with a dismal prognosis. Lower digestive tract perforation (OR=2.418, 95% CI 1.119–5.227, P=0.025), low total protein (OR=0.934, 95% CI 0.879–0.992, P=0.026) and low hemoglobin (OR=0.985, 95% CI 0.971–0.999, P=0.039) were linked to a longer length of stay, especially hemoglobin (OR=0.978, 95% CI 0.966–0.991, P=0.001) in upper digestive tract. High ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR) (OR=1.043, 95% CI 1.012–1.076, P=0.007), high lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (OR=2.158, 95% CI 1.495–3.115, P<0.001) and low prognostic nutrition index (PNI) (OR=0.814, 95% CI 0.751–0.833, P<0.001) predicted septic shock. In upper digestive tract, PLR (OR=1.001, 95% CI 1.000–1.002, P=0.067), LMR (OR=2.160, 95% CI 1.440–3.240, P<0.001) and PNI (OR=0.843, 95% CI 0.767–0.926, P<0.001) were risk factors for septic shock, and total protein (OR=0.796, 95% CI 0.686–0.923, P=0.003) was a risk factor for septic shock in lower digestive tract. High NLR (OR=1.056, 95% CI 1.019–1.093, P=0.003), high LMR (OR=1.760, 95% CI 1.177–2.632, P=0.006) and low PNI (OR=0.832, 95% CI 0.754–0.918, P<0.001) were the risk factors of mortality. In subgroup analysis of perforation site, albumin (OR=0.820, 95% CI 0.719–0.934, P=0.003) and LMR (OR=1.506, 95% CI 1.069–2.123, P=0.019) were risk factors for mortality in upper digestive tract and PNI (OR=0.636, 95% CI 0.445–0.908, P=0.013) was a risk factor for mortality in lower digestive tract. CONCLUSION: Our research found that the perforation site, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, NLR, LMR, PLR and PNI were risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation with a poor prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105887532023-10-21 Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis Yuan, Wenqing Zhou, Xiaozhuan Cai, Zhigao Qiu, Junyu Li, Xi Tong, Gangling Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite medical progress, mortality from gastrointestinal perforation was relatively high. Our study’s objective was to identify risk factors associated with a poor prognosis for gastrointestinal perforation. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal perforation at the Longchuan County People’s Hospital between January 2019 and February 2022 were the subject of a retrospective analysis of their laboratory data. Patients were grouped based on length of hospital stay, septic shock, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients participated in our study. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we identified several risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation associated with a dismal prognosis. Lower digestive tract perforation (OR=2.418, 95% CI 1.119–5.227, P=0.025), low total protein (OR=0.934, 95% CI 0.879–0.992, P=0.026) and low hemoglobin (OR=0.985, 95% CI 0.971–0.999, P=0.039) were linked to a longer length of stay, especially hemoglobin (OR=0.978, 95% CI 0.966–0.991, P=0.001) in upper digestive tract. High ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR) (OR=1.043, 95% CI 1.012–1.076, P=0.007), high lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (OR=2.158, 95% CI 1.495–3.115, P<0.001) and low prognostic nutrition index (PNI) (OR=0.814, 95% CI 0.751–0.833, P<0.001) predicted septic shock. In upper digestive tract, PLR (OR=1.001, 95% CI 1.000–1.002, P=0.067), LMR (OR=2.160, 95% CI 1.440–3.240, P<0.001) and PNI (OR=0.843, 95% CI 0.767–0.926, P<0.001) were risk factors for septic shock, and total protein (OR=0.796, 95% CI 0.686–0.923, P=0.003) was a risk factor for septic shock in lower digestive tract. High NLR (OR=1.056, 95% CI 1.019–1.093, P=0.003), high LMR (OR=1.760, 95% CI 1.177–2.632, P=0.006) and low PNI (OR=0.832, 95% CI 0.754–0.918, P<0.001) were the risk factors of mortality. In subgroup analysis of perforation site, albumin (OR=0.820, 95% CI 0.719–0.934, P=0.003) and LMR (OR=1.506, 95% CI 1.069–2.123, P=0.019) were risk factors for mortality in upper digestive tract and PNI (OR=0.636, 95% CI 0.445–0.908, P=0.013) was a risk factor for mortality in lower digestive tract. CONCLUSION: Our research found that the perforation site, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, NLR, LMR, PLR and PNI were risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation with a poor prognosis. Dove 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10588753/ /pubmed/37868819 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S426676 Text en © 2023 Yuan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yuan, Wenqing
Zhou, Xiaozhuan
Cai, Zhigao
Qiu, Junyu
Li, Xi
Tong, Gangling
Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis
title Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis
title_full Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis
title_fullStr Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis
title_short Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal Perforation with a Poor Prognosis
title_sort risk factors of gastrointestinal perforation with a poor prognosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868819
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S426676
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanwenqing riskfactorsofgastrointestinalperforationwithapoorprognosis
AT zhouxiaozhuan riskfactorsofgastrointestinalperforationwithapoorprognosis
AT caizhigao riskfactorsofgastrointestinalperforationwithapoorprognosis
AT qiujunyu riskfactorsofgastrointestinalperforationwithapoorprognosis
AT lixi riskfactorsofgastrointestinalperforationwithapoorprognosis
AT tonggangling riskfactorsofgastrointestinalperforationwithapoorprognosis