Cargando…
Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37862417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205 |
_version_ | 1785123689586491392 |
---|---|
author | Spoon, Katie LaBerge, Nicholas Wapman, K. Hunter Zhang, Sam Morgan, Allison C. Galesic, Mirta Fosdick, Bailey K. Larremore, Daniel B. Clauset, Aaron |
author_facet | Spoon, Katie LaBerge, Nicholas Wapman, K. Hunter Zhang, Sam Morgan, Allison C. Galesic, Mirta Fosdick, Bailey K. Larremore, Daniel B. Clauset, Aaron |
author_sort | Spoon, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of strongly gendered attrition at lower-prestige institutions, in non-STEM fields, and among tenured faculty. A large-scale survey of the same faculty indicates that the reasons faculty leave are gendered, even for institutions, fields, and career ages in which retention rates are not. Women are more likely than men to feel pushed from their jobs and less likely to feel pulled toward better opportunities, and women leave or consider leaving because of workplace climate more often than work-life balance. These results quantify the systemic nature of gendered faculty retention; contextualize its relationship with career age, institutional prestige, and field; and highlight the importance of understanding the gendered reasons for attrition rather than focusing on rates alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10588949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105889492023-10-21 Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty Spoon, Katie LaBerge, Nicholas Wapman, K. Hunter Zhang, Sam Morgan, Allison C. Galesic, Mirta Fosdick, Bailey K. Larremore, Daniel B. Clauset, Aaron Sci Adv Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of strongly gendered attrition at lower-prestige institutions, in non-STEM fields, and among tenured faculty. A large-scale survey of the same faculty indicates that the reasons faculty leave are gendered, even for institutions, fields, and career ages in which retention rates are not. Women are more likely than men to feel pushed from their jobs and less likely to feel pulled toward better opportunities, and women leave or consider leaving because of workplace climate more often than work-life balance. These results quantify the systemic nature of gendered faculty retention; contextualize its relationship with career age, institutional prestige, and field; and highlight the importance of understanding the gendered reasons for attrition rather than focusing on rates alone. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10588949/ /pubmed/37862417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences Spoon, Katie LaBerge, Nicholas Wapman, K. Hunter Zhang, Sam Morgan, Allison C. Galesic, Mirta Fosdick, Bailey K. Larremore, Daniel B. Clauset, Aaron Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty |
title | Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty |
title_full | Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty |
title_fullStr | Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty |
title_short | Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty |
title_sort | gender and retention patterns among u.s. faculty |
topic | Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37862417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spoonkatie genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT labergenicholas genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT wapmankhunter genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT zhangsam genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT morganallisonc genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT galesicmirta genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT fosdickbaileyk genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT larremoredanielb genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty AT clausetaaron genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty |