Cargando…

Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty

Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spoon, Katie, LaBerge, Nicholas, Wapman, K. Hunter, Zhang, Sam, Morgan, Allison C., Galesic, Mirta, Fosdick, Bailey K., Larremore, Daniel B., Clauset, Aaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37862417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205
_version_ 1785123689586491392
author Spoon, Katie
LaBerge, Nicholas
Wapman, K. Hunter
Zhang, Sam
Morgan, Allison C.
Galesic, Mirta
Fosdick, Bailey K.
Larremore, Daniel B.
Clauset, Aaron
author_facet Spoon, Katie
LaBerge, Nicholas
Wapman, K. Hunter
Zhang, Sam
Morgan, Allison C.
Galesic, Mirta
Fosdick, Bailey K.
Larremore, Daniel B.
Clauset, Aaron
author_sort Spoon, Katie
collection PubMed
description Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of strongly gendered attrition at lower-prestige institutions, in non-STEM fields, and among tenured faculty. A large-scale survey of the same faculty indicates that the reasons faculty leave are gendered, even for institutions, fields, and career ages in which retention rates are not. Women are more likely than men to feel pushed from their jobs and less likely to feel pulled toward better opportunities, and women leave or consider leaving because of workplace climate more often than work-life balance. These results quantify the systemic nature of gendered faculty retention; contextualize its relationship with career age, institutional prestige, and field; and highlight the importance of understanding the gendered reasons for attrition rather than focusing on rates alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10588949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105889492023-10-21 Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty Spoon, Katie LaBerge, Nicholas Wapman, K. Hunter Zhang, Sam Morgan, Allison C. Galesic, Mirta Fosdick, Bailey K. Larremore, Daniel B. Clauset, Aaron Sci Adv Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States–based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of strongly gendered attrition at lower-prestige institutions, in non-STEM fields, and among tenured faculty. A large-scale survey of the same faculty indicates that the reasons faculty leave are gendered, even for institutions, fields, and career ages in which retention rates are not. Women are more likely than men to feel pushed from their jobs and less likely to feel pulled toward better opportunities, and women leave or consider leaving because of workplace climate more often than work-life balance. These results quantify the systemic nature of gendered faculty retention; contextualize its relationship with career age, institutional prestige, and field; and highlight the importance of understanding the gendered reasons for attrition rather than focusing on rates alone. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10588949/ /pubmed/37862417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences
Spoon, Katie
LaBerge, Nicholas
Wapman, K. Hunter
Zhang, Sam
Morgan, Allison C.
Galesic, Mirta
Fosdick, Bailey K.
Larremore, Daniel B.
Clauset, Aaron
Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
title Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
title_full Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
title_fullStr Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
title_full_unstemmed Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
title_short Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty
title_sort gender and retention patterns among u.s. faculty
topic Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37862417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205
work_keys_str_mv AT spoonkatie genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT labergenicholas genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT wapmankhunter genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT zhangsam genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT morganallisonc genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT galesicmirta genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT fosdickbaileyk genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT larremoredanielb genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty
AT clausetaaron genderandretentionpatternsamongusfaculty