Cargando…
Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
PURPOSE: Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1 |
_version_ | 1785123722186719232 |
---|---|
author | Tekieli, Lukasz Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna Dabrowski, Wladyslaw Dzierwa, Karolina Moczulski, Zbigniew Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata Mazurek, Adam Stefaniak, Justyna Paluszek, Piotr Krupinski, Maciej Przewlocki, Tadeusz Pieniazek, Piotr Musialek, Piotr |
author_facet | Tekieli, Lukasz Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna Dabrowski, Wladyslaw Dzierwa, Karolina Moczulski, Zbigniew Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata Mazurek, Adam Stefaniak, Justyna Paluszek, Piotr Krupinski, Maciej Przewlocki, Tadeusz Pieniazek, Piotr Musialek, Piotr |
author_sort | Tekieli, Lukasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular ultrasound, IVUS. METHODS: 300 consecutive patients (age 47–83 years, 192 men, 64% asymptomatic) with carotid artery stenosis of “ ≥ 50%” referred for potential revascularization received as per study protocol (i) duplex ultrasound (DUS), (ii) computed tomography angiography (CTA), (iii) intraarterial quantitative angiography (iQA) and (iv) and (iv) IVUS. Correlation of measurements with IVUS (r), proportion of those concordant (within 10%) and proportion of under/overestimated were calculated along with recipient-operating-characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: For IVUS area stenosis (AS) and IVUS minimal lumen area (MLA), there was only a moderate correlation with DUS velocities (peak-systolic, PSV; end-diastolic, EDV; r values of 0.42–0.51, p < 0.001 for all). CTA systematically underestimated both reference area and MLA (80.4% and 92.3% cases) but CTA error was lesser for AS (proportion concordant-57.4%; CTA under/overestimation-12.5%/30.1%). iQA diameter stenosis (DS) was found concordant with IVUS in 41.1% measurements (iQA under/overestimation 7.9%/51.0%). By univariate model, PSV (ROC area-under-the-curve, AUC, 0.77, cutoff 2.6 m/s), EDV (AUC 0.72, cutoff 0.71 m/s) and CTA-DS (AUC 0.83, cutoff 59.6%) were predictors of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS (p < 0.001 for all). Best predictor, however, of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS was stenosis severity evaluation by automated contrast column density measurement on iQA (AUC 0.87, cutoff 68%, p < 0.001). Regarding non-invasive techniques, CTA was the only independent diagnostic modality against IVUS on multivariate model (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: IVUS validation shows significant imaging modality-dependent variations in carotid stenosis severity determination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10589130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105891302023-10-22 Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS) Tekieli, Lukasz Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna Dabrowski, Wladyslaw Dzierwa, Karolina Moczulski, Zbigniew Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata Mazurek, Adam Stefaniak, Justyna Paluszek, Piotr Krupinski, Maciej Przewlocki, Tadeusz Pieniazek, Piotr Musialek, Piotr Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper PURPOSE: Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular ultrasound, IVUS. METHODS: 300 consecutive patients (age 47–83 years, 192 men, 64% asymptomatic) with carotid artery stenosis of “ ≥ 50%” referred for potential revascularization received as per study protocol (i) duplex ultrasound (DUS), (ii) computed tomography angiography (CTA), (iii) intraarterial quantitative angiography (iQA) and (iv) and (iv) IVUS. Correlation of measurements with IVUS (r), proportion of those concordant (within 10%) and proportion of under/overestimated were calculated along with recipient-operating-characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: For IVUS area stenosis (AS) and IVUS minimal lumen area (MLA), there was only a moderate correlation with DUS velocities (peak-systolic, PSV; end-diastolic, EDV; r values of 0.42–0.51, p < 0.001 for all). CTA systematically underestimated both reference area and MLA (80.4% and 92.3% cases) but CTA error was lesser for AS (proportion concordant-57.4%; CTA under/overestimation-12.5%/30.1%). iQA diameter stenosis (DS) was found concordant with IVUS in 41.1% measurements (iQA under/overestimation 7.9%/51.0%). By univariate model, PSV (ROC area-under-the-curve, AUC, 0.77, cutoff 2.6 m/s), EDV (AUC 0.72, cutoff 0.71 m/s) and CTA-DS (AUC 0.83, cutoff 59.6%) were predictors of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS (p < 0.001 for all). Best predictor, however, of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS was stenosis severity evaluation by automated contrast column density measurement on iQA (AUC 0.87, cutoff 68%, p < 0.001). Regarding non-invasive techniques, CTA was the only independent diagnostic modality against IVUS on multivariate model (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: IVUS validation shows significant imaging modality-dependent variations in carotid stenosis severity determination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1. Springer Netherlands 2023-08-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10589130/ /pubmed/37603155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Tekieli, Lukasz Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna Dabrowski, Wladyslaw Dzierwa, Karolina Moczulski, Zbigniew Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata Mazurek, Adam Stefaniak, Justyna Paluszek, Piotr Krupinski, Maciej Przewlocki, Tadeusz Pieniazek, Piotr Musialek, Piotr Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS) |
title | Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR
Ultrasound Study (CARUS) |
title_full | Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR
Ultrasound Study (CARUS) |
title_fullStr | Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR
Ultrasound Study (CARUS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR
Ultrasound Study (CARUS) |
title_short | Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR
Ultrasound Study (CARUS) |
title_sort | imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: carotid artery intravascular
ultrasound study (carus) |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tekielilukasz imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT kablakziembickaanna imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT dabrowskiwladyslaw imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT dzierwakarolina imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT moczulskizbigniew imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT urbanczykzawadzkamalgorzata imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT mazurekadam imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT stefaniakjustyna imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT paluszekpiotr imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT krupinskimaciej imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT przewlockitadeusz imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT pieniazekpiotr imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus AT musialekpiotr imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus |