Cargando…

Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)

PURPOSE: Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tekieli, Lukasz, Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna, Dabrowski, Wladyslaw, Dzierwa, Karolina, Moczulski, Zbigniew, Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata, Mazurek, Adam, Stefaniak, Justyna, Paluszek, Piotr, Krupinski, Maciej, Przewlocki, Tadeusz, Pieniazek, Piotr, Musialek, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1
_version_ 1785123722186719232
author Tekieli, Lukasz
Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna
Dabrowski, Wladyslaw
Dzierwa, Karolina
Moczulski, Zbigniew
Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata
Mazurek, Adam
Stefaniak, Justyna
Paluszek, Piotr
Krupinski, Maciej
Przewlocki, Tadeusz
Pieniazek, Piotr
Musialek, Piotr
author_facet Tekieli, Lukasz
Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna
Dabrowski, Wladyslaw
Dzierwa, Karolina
Moczulski, Zbigniew
Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata
Mazurek, Adam
Stefaniak, Justyna
Paluszek, Piotr
Krupinski, Maciej
Przewlocki, Tadeusz
Pieniazek, Piotr
Musialek, Piotr
author_sort Tekieli, Lukasz
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular ultrasound, IVUS. METHODS: 300 consecutive patients (age 47–83 years, 192 men, 64% asymptomatic) with carotid artery stenosis of “ ≥ 50%” referred for potential revascularization received as per study protocol (i) duplex ultrasound (DUS), (ii) computed tomography angiography (CTA), (iii) intraarterial quantitative angiography (iQA) and (iv) and (iv) IVUS. Correlation of measurements with IVUS (r), proportion of those concordant (within 10%) and proportion of under/overestimated were calculated along with recipient-operating-characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: For IVUS area stenosis (AS) and IVUS minimal lumen area (MLA), there was only a moderate correlation with DUS velocities (peak-systolic, PSV; end-diastolic, EDV; r values of 0.42–0.51, p < 0.001 for all). CTA systematically underestimated both reference area and MLA (80.4% and 92.3% cases) but CTA error was lesser for AS (proportion concordant-57.4%; CTA under/overestimation-12.5%/30.1%). iQA diameter stenosis (DS) was found concordant with IVUS in 41.1% measurements (iQA under/overestimation 7.9%/51.0%). By univariate model, PSV (ROC area-under-the-curve, AUC, 0.77, cutoff 2.6 m/s), EDV (AUC 0.72, cutoff 0.71 m/s) and CTA-DS (AUC 0.83, cutoff 59.6%) were predictors of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS (p < 0.001 for all). Best predictor, however, of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS was stenosis severity evaluation by automated contrast column density measurement on iQA (AUC 0.87, cutoff 68%, p < 0.001). Regarding non-invasive techniques, CTA was the only independent diagnostic modality against IVUS on multivariate model (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: IVUS validation shows significant imaging modality-dependent variations in carotid stenosis severity determination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10589130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105891302023-10-22 Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS) Tekieli, Lukasz Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna Dabrowski, Wladyslaw Dzierwa, Karolina Moczulski, Zbigniew Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata Mazurek, Adam Stefaniak, Justyna Paluszek, Piotr Krupinski, Maciej Przewlocki, Tadeusz Pieniazek, Piotr Musialek, Piotr Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper PURPOSE: Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular ultrasound, IVUS. METHODS: 300 consecutive patients (age 47–83 years, 192 men, 64% asymptomatic) with carotid artery stenosis of “ ≥ 50%” referred for potential revascularization received as per study protocol (i) duplex ultrasound (DUS), (ii) computed tomography angiography (CTA), (iii) intraarterial quantitative angiography (iQA) and (iv) and (iv) IVUS. Correlation of measurements with IVUS (r), proportion of those concordant (within 10%) and proportion of under/overestimated were calculated along with recipient-operating-characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: For IVUS area stenosis (AS) and IVUS minimal lumen area (MLA), there was only a moderate correlation with DUS velocities (peak-systolic, PSV; end-diastolic, EDV; r values of 0.42–0.51, p < 0.001 for all). CTA systematically underestimated both reference area and MLA (80.4% and 92.3% cases) but CTA error was lesser for AS (proportion concordant-57.4%; CTA under/overestimation-12.5%/30.1%). iQA diameter stenosis (DS) was found concordant with IVUS in 41.1% measurements (iQA under/overestimation 7.9%/51.0%). By univariate model, PSV (ROC area-under-the-curve, AUC, 0.77, cutoff 2.6 m/s), EDV (AUC 0.72, cutoff 0.71 m/s) and CTA-DS (AUC 0.83, cutoff 59.6%) were predictors of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS (p < 0.001 for all). Best predictor, however, of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS was stenosis severity evaluation by automated contrast column density measurement on iQA (AUC 0.87, cutoff 68%, p < 0.001). Regarding non-invasive techniques, CTA was the only independent diagnostic modality against IVUS on multivariate model (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: IVUS validation shows significant imaging modality-dependent variations in carotid stenosis severity determination. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1. Springer Netherlands 2023-08-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10589130/ /pubmed/37603155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tekieli, Lukasz
Kablak-Ziembicka, Anna
Dabrowski, Wladyslaw
Dzierwa, Karolina
Moczulski, Zbigniew
Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, Malgorzata
Mazurek, Adam
Stefaniak, Justyna
Paluszek, Piotr
Krupinski, Maciej
Przewlocki, Tadeusz
Pieniazek, Piotr
Musialek, Piotr
Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
title Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
title_full Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
title_fullStr Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
title_full_unstemmed Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
title_short Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)
title_sort imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: carotid artery intravascular ultrasound study (carus)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02875-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tekielilukasz imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT kablakziembickaanna imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT dabrowskiwladyslaw imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT dzierwakarolina imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT moczulskizbigniew imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT urbanczykzawadzkamalgorzata imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT mazurekadam imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT stefaniakjustyna imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT paluszekpiotr imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT krupinskimaciej imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT przewlockitadeusz imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT pieniazekpiotr imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus
AT musialekpiotr imagingmodalitydependentcarotidstenosisseverityvariationsagainstintravascularultrasoundasareferencecarotidarteryintravascularultrasoundstudycarus