Cargando…
Optimization of Q.Clear reconstruction for dynamic (18)F PET imaging
BACKGROUND: Q.Clear, a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm, has shown high potential in improving quantitation accuracy in PET systems. The Q.Clear algorithm controls noise during the iterative reconstruction through a β penalization factor. This study aimed to determine the optim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37861929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00584-1 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Q.Clear, a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm, has shown high potential in improving quantitation accuracy in PET systems. The Q.Clear algorithm controls noise during the iterative reconstruction through a β penalization factor. This study aimed to determine the optimal β-factor for accurate quantitation of dynamic PET scans. METHODS: A Flangeless Esser PET Phantom with eight hollow spheres (4–25 mm) was scanned on a GE Discovery MI PET/CT system. Data were reconstructed into five sets of variable acquisition times using Q.Clear with 18 different β-factors ranging from 100 to 3500. The recovery coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (CV(RC)) and root-mean-square error (RMSE(RC)) were evaluated for the phantom data. Two male patients with recurrent glioblastoma were scanned on the same scanner using (18)F-PSMA-1007. Using an irreversible two-tissue compartment model, the area under curve (AUC) and the net influx rate K(i) were calculated to assess the impact of different β-factors on the pharmacokinetic analysis of clinical PET brain data. RESULTS: In general, RC and CV(RC) decreased with increasing β-factor in the phantom data. For small spheres (< 10 mm), and in particular for short acquisition times, low β-factors resulted in high variability and an overestimation of measured activity. Increasing the β-factor improves the variability, however at a cost of underestimating the measured activity. For the clinical data, AUC decreased and K(i) increased with increased β-factor; a change in β-factor from 300 to 1000 resulted in a 25.5% increase in the K(i). CONCLUSION: In a complex dynamic dataset with variable acquisition times, the optimal β-factor provides a balance between accuracy and precision. Based on our results, we suggest a β-factor of 300–500 for quantitation of small structures with dynamic PET imaging, while large structures may benefit from higher β-factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03951142. Registered 5 October 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03951142. EudraCT no 2018-003229-27. Registered 26 February 2019, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2018-003229-27/NO. |
---|