Cargando…

Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity

PURPOSE: This review compares reirradiation (reRT), systemic therapy and combination therapy (reRT & systemic therapy) with regards to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marwah, Ravi, Xing, Daniel, Squire, Timothy, Soon, Yu Yang, Gan, Hui K., Ng, Sweet Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37733174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0
_version_ 1785123732324352000
author Marwah, Ravi
Xing, Daniel
Squire, Timothy
Soon, Yu Yang
Gan, Hui K.
Ng, Sweet Ping
author_facet Marwah, Ravi
Xing, Daniel
Squire, Timothy
Soon, Yu Yang
Gan, Hui K.
Ng, Sweet Ping
author_sort Marwah, Ravi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This review compares reirradiation (reRT), systemic therapy and combination therapy (reRT & systemic therapy) with regards to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG). METHODS: A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase and CENTRAL. Studies reporting OS, PFS, AEs and/or QoL and encompassing the following groups were included; reirradiation vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs reRT, and bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy. Meta-analyses were performed utilising a random effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies (three randomised, twenty-eight non-randomised) comprising 2084 participants were included. In the combination therapy vs systemic therapy group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41–0.79); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56–0.95); low certainty) and there was no difference in grade 3 + AEs (RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.57–1.86); very low certainty). In the combination therapy vs reRT group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.38–0.72); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.52–0.93); low certainty). In the bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy group, adding bevacizumab improved PFS (HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.27–0.77); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.24–0.72; low certainty) and reduced radionecrosis (RR 0.17 (95% CI 0.06–0.48); low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy may improve OS and PFS with acceptable toxicities in patients with rHGG compared to reRT or systemic therapy alone. Particularly, combining bevacizumab with reRT prophylactically reduces radionecrosis. Registration: CRD42022291741. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10589175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105891752023-10-22 Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity Marwah, Ravi Xing, Daniel Squire, Timothy Soon, Yu Yang Gan, Hui K. Ng, Sweet Ping J Neurooncol Review PURPOSE: This review compares reirradiation (reRT), systemic therapy and combination therapy (reRT & systemic therapy) with regards to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG). METHODS: A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase and CENTRAL. Studies reporting OS, PFS, AEs and/or QoL and encompassing the following groups were included; reirradiation vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs reRT, and bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy. Meta-analyses were performed utilising a random effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies (three randomised, twenty-eight non-randomised) comprising 2084 participants were included. In the combination therapy vs systemic therapy group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41–0.79); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56–0.95); low certainty) and there was no difference in grade 3 + AEs (RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.57–1.86); very low certainty). In the combination therapy vs reRT group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.38–0.72); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.52–0.93); low certainty). In the bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy group, adding bevacizumab improved PFS (HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.27–0.77); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.24–0.72; low certainty) and reduced radionecrosis (RR 0.17 (95% CI 0.06–0.48); low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy may improve OS and PFS with acceptable toxicities in patients with rHGG compared to reRT or systemic therapy alone. Particularly, combining bevacizumab with reRT prophylactically reduces radionecrosis. Registration: CRD42022291741. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0. Springer US 2023-09-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10589175/ /pubmed/37733174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Marwah, Ravi
Xing, Daniel
Squire, Timothy
Soon, Yu Yang
Gan, Hui K.
Ng, Sweet Ping
Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
title Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
title_full Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
title_fullStr Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
title_full_unstemmed Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
title_short Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
title_sort reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37733174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0
work_keys_str_mv AT marwahravi reirradiationversussystemictherapyversuscombinationtherapyforrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsurvivalandtoxicity
AT xingdaniel reirradiationversussystemictherapyversuscombinationtherapyforrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsurvivalandtoxicity
AT squiretimothy reirradiationversussystemictherapyversuscombinationtherapyforrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsurvivalandtoxicity
AT soonyuyang reirradiationversussystemictherapyversuscombinationtherapyforrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsurvivalandtoxicity
AT ganhuik reirradiationversussystemictherapyversuscombinationtherapyforrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsurvivalandtoxicity
AT ngsweetping reirradiationversussystemictherapyversuscombinationtherapyforrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsurvivalandtoxicity