Cargando…

Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor

Lidar (light-detection and ranging) has revolutionized archaeology. We are now able to produce high-resolution maps of archaeological surface features over vast areas, allowing us to see ancient land-use and anthropogenic landscape modification at previously un-imagined scales. In the tropics, this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carleton, W. Christopher, Klassen, Sarah, Niles-Weed, Jonathan, Evans, Damian, Roberts, Patrick, Groucutt, Huw S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44875-0
_version_ 1785123761382490112
author Carleton, W. Christopher
Klassen, Sarah
Niles-Weed, Jonathan
Evans, Damian
Roberts, Patrick
Groucutt, Huw S.
author_facet Carleton, W. Christopher
Klassen, Sarah
Niles-Weed, Jonathan
Evans, Damian
Roberts, Patrick
Groucutt, Huw S.
author_sort Carleton, W. Christopher
collection PubMed
description Lidar (light-detection and ranging) has revolutionized archaeology. We are now able to produce high-resolution maps of archaeological surface features over vast areas, allowing us to see ancient land-use and anthropogenic landscape modification at previously un-imagined scales. In the tropics, this has enabled documentation of previously archaeologically unrecorded cities in various tropical regions, igniting scientific and popular interest in ancient tropical urbanism. An emerging challenge, however, is to add temporal depth to this torrent of new spatial data because traditional archaeological investigations are time consuming and inherently destructive. So far, we are aware of only one attempt to apply statistics and machine learning to remotely-sensed data in order to add time-depth to spatial data. Using temples at the well-known massive urban complex of Angkor in Cambodia as a case study, a predictive model was developed combining standard regression with novel machine learning methods to estimate temple foundation dates for undated Angkorian temples identified with remote sensing, including lidar. The model’s predictions were used to produce an historical population curve for Angkor and study urban expansion at this important ancient tropical urban centre. The approach, however, has certain limitations. Importantly, its handling of uncertainties leaves room for improvement, and like many machine learning approaches it is opaque regarding which predictor variables are most relevant. Here we describe a new study in which we investigated an alternative Bayesian regression approach applied to the same case study. We compare the two models in terms of their inner workings, results, and interpretive utility. We also use an updated database of Angkorian temples as the training dataset, allowing us to produce the most current estimate for temple foundations and historic spatiotemporal urban growth patterns at Angkor. Our results demonstrate that, in principle, predictive statistical and machine learning methods could be used to rapidly add chronological information to large lidar datasets and a Bayesian paradigm makes it possible to incorporate important uncertainties—especially chronological—into modelled temporal estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10589302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105893022023-10-22 Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor Carleton, W. Christopher Klassen, Sarah Niles-Weed, Jonathan Evans, Damian Roberts, Patrick Groucutt, Huw S. Sci Rep Article Lidar (light-detection and ranging) has revolutionized archaeology. We are now able to produce high-resolution maps of archaeological surface features over vast areas, allowing us to see ancient land-use and anthropogenic landscape modification at previously un-imagined scales. In the tropics, this has enabled documentation of previously archaeologically unrecorded cities in various tropical regions, igniting scientific and popular interest in ancient tropical urbanism. An emerging challenge, however, is to add temporal depth to this torrent of new spatial data because traditional archaeological investigations are time consuming and inherently destructive. So far, we are aware of only one attempt to apply statistics and machine learning to remotely-sensed data in order to add time-depth to spatial data. Using temples at the well-known massive urban complex of Angkor in Cambodia as a case study, a predictive model was developed combining standard regression with novel machine learning methods to estimate temple foundation dates for undated Angkorian temples identified with remote sensing, including lidar. The model’s predictions were used to produce an historical population curve for Angkor and study urban expansion at this important ancient tropical urban centre. The approach, however, has certain limitations. Importantly, its handling of uncertainties leaves room for improvement, and like many machine learning approaches it is opaque regarding which predictor variables are most relevant. Here we describe a new study in which we investigated an alternative Bayesian regression approach applied to the same case study. We compare the two models in terms of their inner workings, results, and interpretive utility. We also use an updated database of Angkorian temples as the training dataset, allowing us to produce the most current estimate for temple foundations and historic spatiotemporal urban growth patterns at Angkor. Our results demonstrate that, in principle, predictive statistical and machine learning methods could be used to rapidly add chronological information to large lidar datasets and a Bayesian paradigm makes it possible to incorporate important uncertainties—especially chronological—into modelled temporal estimates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10589302/ /pubmed/37864037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44875-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Carleton, W. Christopher
Klassen, Sarah
Niles-Weed, Jonathan
Evans, Damian
Roberts, Patrick
Groucutt, Huw S.
Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
title Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
title_full Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
title_fullStr Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
title_short Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
title_sort bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at angkor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44875-0
work_keys_str_mv AT carletonwchristopher bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor
AT klassensarah bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor
AT nilesweedjonathan bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor
AT evansdamian bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor
AT robertspatrick bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor
AT groucutthuws bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor