Cargando…
Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor
Lidar (light-detection and ranging) has revolutionized archaeology. We are now able to produce high-resolution maps of archaeological surface features over vast areas, allowing us to see ancient land-use and anthropogenic landscape modification at previously un-imagined scales. In the tropics, this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44875-0 |
_version_ | 1785123761382490112 |
---|---|
author | Carleton, W. Christopher Klassen, Sarah Niles-Weed, Jonathan Evans, Damian Roberts, Patrick Groucutt, Huw S. |
author_facet | Carleton, W. Christopher Klassen, Sarah Niles-Weed, Jonathan Evans, Damian Roberts, Patrick Groucutt, Huw S. |
author_sort | Carleton, W. Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lidar (light-detection and ranging) has revolutionized archaeology. We are now able to produce high-resolution maps of archaeological surface features over vast areas, allowing us to see ancient land-use and anthropogenic landscape modification at previously un-imagined scales. In the tropics, this has enabled documentation of previously archaeologically unrecorded cities in various tropical regions, igniting scientific and popular interest in ancient tropical urbanism. An emerging challenge, however, is to add temporal depth to this torrent of new spatial data because traditional archaeological investigations are time consuming and inherently destructive. So far, we are aware of only one attempt to apply statistics and machine learning to remotely-sensed data in order to add time-depth to spatial data. Using temples at the well-known massive urban complex of Angkor in Cambodia as a case study, a predictive model was developed combining standard regression with novel machine learning methods to estimate temple foundation dates for undated Angkorian temples identified with remote sensing, including lidar. The model’s predictions were used to produce an historical population curve for Angkor and study urban expansion at this important ancient tropical urban centre. The approach, however, has certain limitations. Importantly, its handling of uncertainties leaves room for improvement, and like many machine learning approaches it is opaque regarding which predictor variables are most relevant. Here we describe a new study in which we investigated an alternative Bayesian regression approach applied to the same case study. We compare the two models in terms of their inner workings, results, and interpretive utility. We also use an updated database of Angkorian temples as the training dataset, allowing us to produce the most current estimate for temple foundations and historic spatiotemporal urban growth patterns at Angkor. Our results demonstrate that, in principle, predictive statistical and machine learning methods could be used to rapidly add chronological information to large lidar datasets and a Bayesian paradigm makes it possible to incorporate important uncertainties—especially chronological—into modelled temporal estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10589302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105893022023-10-22 Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor Carleton, W. Christopher Klassen, Sarah Niles-Weed, Jonathan Evans, Damian Roberts, Patrick Groucutt, Huw S. Sci Rep Article Lidar (light-detection and ranging) has revolutionized archaeology. We are now able to produce high-resolution maps of archaeological surface features over vast areas, allowing us to see ancient land-use and anthropogenic landscape modification at previously un-imagined scales. In the tropics, this has enabled documentation of previously archaeologically unrecorded cities in various tropical regions, igniting scientific and popular interest in ancient tropical urbanism. An emerging challenge, however, is to add temporal depth to this torrent of new spatial data because traditional archaeological investigations are time consuming and inherently destructive. So far, we are aware of only one attempt to apply statistics and machine learning to remotely-sensed data in order to add time-depth to spatial data. Using temples at the well-known massive urban complex of Angkor in Cambodia as a case study, a predictive model was developed combining standard regression with novel machine learning methods to estimate temple foundation dates for undated Angkorian temples identified with remote sensing, including lidar. The model’s predictions were used to produce an historical population curve for Angkor and study urban expansion at this important ancient tropical urban centre. The approach, however, has certain limitations. Importantly, its handling of uncertainties leaves room for improvement, and like many machine learning approaches it is opaque regarding which predictor variables are most relevant. Here we describe a new study in which we investigated an alternative Bayesian regression approach applied to the same case study. We compare the two models in terms of their inner workings, results, and interpretive utility. We also use an updated database of Angkorian temples as the training dataset, allowing us to produce the most current estimate for temple foundations and historic spatiotemporal urban growth patterns at Angkor. Our results demonstrate that, in principle, predictive statistical and machine learning methods could be used to rapidly add chronological information to large lidar datasets and a Bayesian paradigm makes it possible to incorporate important uncertainties—especially chronological—into modelled temporal estimates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10589302/ /pubmed/37864037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44875-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Carleton, W. Christopher Klassen, Sarah Niles-Weed, Jonathan Evans, Damian Roberts, Patrick Groucutt, Huw S. Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor |
title | Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor |
title_full | Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor |
title_fullStr | Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor |
title_short | Bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at Angkor |
title_sort | bayesian regression versus machine learning for rapid age estimation of archaeological features identified with lidar at angkor |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44875-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carletonwchristopher bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor AT klassensarah bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor AT nilesweedjonathan bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor AT evansdamian bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor AT robertspatrick bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor AT groucutthuws bayesianregressionversusmachinelearningforrapidageestimationofarchaeologicalfeaturesidentifiedwithlidaratangkor |