Cargando…

Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection

BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubin, Mark N., Shah, Ruchir, Devlin, Thomas, Youn, Teddy S., Waters, Michael F., Volpi, John J., Stayman, Aaron, Douville, Colleen M., Lowenkopf, Ted, Tsivgoulis, Georgios, Alexandrov, Andrei V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043380
_version_ 1785123791291023360
author Rubin, Mark N.
Shah, Ruchir
Devlin, Thomas
Youn, Teddy S.
Waters, Michael F.
Volpi, John J.
Stayman, Aaron
Douville, Colleen M.
Lowenkopf, Ted
Tsivgoulis, Georgios
Alexandrov, Andrei V.
author_facet Rubin, Mark N.
Shah, Ruchir
Devlin, Thomas
Youn, Teddy S.
Waters, Michael F.
Volpi, John J.
Stayman, Aaron
Douville, Colleen M.
Lowenkopf, Ted
Tsivgoulis, Georgios
Alexandrov, Andrei V.
author_sort Rubin, Mark N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD), which is noninvasive and accurate but scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm device clinical trial of robot-assisted TCD (raTCD) versus TTE for RLS diagnosis at 6 clinical sites in patients who presented with an event suspicious for embolic cerebrovascular ischemia from October 6, 2020 to October 20, 2021. raTCD was performed with standard TCD bubble study technique. TTE bubble study was performed per local standards. The primary outcome was rate of RLS detection by raTCD versus TTE. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled, 129 evaluable (intent to scan) and 121 subjects had complete data per protocol. In the intent to scan cohort, mean age was 60±15 years, 47% were women, and all qualifying events were diagnosed as ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. raTCD was positive for RLS in 82 subjects (64%) and TTE was positive in 26 (20%; absolute difference 43.4% [95% CI, 35.2%–52.0%]; P<0.001). On prespecified secondary analysis, large RLS was detected by raTCD in 35 subjects (27%) versus 13 (10%) by TTE (absolute difference 17.0% [95% CI, 11.5%–24.5%]; P<0.001). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: raTCD was safe and ≈3 times more likely to diagnose RLS than TTE. TTE completely missed or underdiagnosed two thirds of large shunts diagnosed by raTCD. The raTCD device, used by health professionals with no prior TCD training, may allow providers to achieve the known sensitivity of TCD for RLS and patent foramen ovale detection without the need for an experienced operator to perform the test. Pending confirmatory studies, TCD appears to be the superior screen for RLS compared with TTE (funded by NeuraSignal). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04604015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10589435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105894352023-10-22 Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection Rubin, Mark N. Shah, Ruchir Devlin, Thomas Youn, Teddy S. Waters, Michael F. Volpi, John J. Stayman, Aaron Douville, Colleen M. Lowenkopf, Ted Tsivgoulis, Georgios Alexandrov, Andrei V. Stroke Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD), which is noninvasive and accurate but scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm device clinical trial of robot-assisted TCD (raTCD) versus TTE for RLS diagnosis at 6 clinical sites in patients who presented with an event suspicious for embolic cerebrovascular ischemia from October 6, 2020 to October 20, 2021. raTCD was performed with standard TCD bubble study technique. TTE bubble study was performed per local standards. The primary outcome was rate of RLS detection by raTCD versus TTE. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled, 129 evaluable (intent to scan) and 121 subjects had complete data per protocol. In the intent to scan cohort, mean age was 60±15 years, 47% were women, and all qualifying events were diagnosed as ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. raTCD was positive for RLS in 82 subjects (64%) and TTE was positive in 26 (20%; absolute difference 43.4% [95% CI, 35.2%–52.0%]; P<0.001). On prespecified secondary analysis, large RLS was detected by raTCD in 35 subjects (27%) versus 13 (10%) by TTE (absolute difference 17.0% [95% CI, 11.5%–24.5%]; P<0.001). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: raTCD was safe and ≈3 times more likely to diagnose RLS than TTE. TTE completely missed or underdiagnosed two thirds of large shunts diagnosed by raTCD. The raTCD device, used by health professionals with no prior TCD training, may allow providers to achieve the known sensitivity of TCD for RLS and patent foramen ovale detection without the need for an experienced operator to perform the test. Pending confirmatory studies, TCD appears to be the superior screen for RLS compared with TTE (funded by NeuraSignal). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04604015. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-05 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10589435/ /pubmed/37795589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043380 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Rubin, Mark N.
Shah, Ruchir
Devlin, Thomas
Youn, Teddy S.
Waters, Michael F.
Volpi, John J.
Stayman, Aaron
Douville, Colleen M.
Lowenkopf, Ted
Tsivgoulis, Georgios
Alexandrov, Andrei V.
Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
title Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
title_full Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
title_fullStr Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
title_short Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
title_sort robot-assisted transcranial doppler versus transthoracic echocardiography for right to left shunt detection
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043380
work_keys_str_mv AT rubinmarkn robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT shahruchir robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT devlinthomas robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT younteddys robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT watersmichaelf robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT volpijohnj robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT staymanaaron robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT douvillecolleenm robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT lowenkopfted robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT tsivgoulisgeorgios robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection
AT alexandrovandreiv robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection