Cargando…
Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection
BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043380 |
_version_ | 1785123791291023360 |
---|---|
author | Rubin, Mark N. Shah, Ruchir Devlin, Thomas Youn, Teddy S. Waters, Michael F. Volpi, John J. Stayman, Aaron Douville, Colleen M. Lowenkopf, Ted Tsivgoulis, Georgios Alexandrov, Andrei V. |
author_facet | Rubin, Mark N. Shah, Ruchir Devlin, Thomas Youn, Teddy S. Waters, Michael F. Volpi, John J. Stayman, Aaron Douville, Colleen M. Lowenkopf, Ted Tsivgoulis, Georgios Alexandrov, Andrei V. |
author_sort | Rubin, Mark N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD), which is noninvasive and accurate but scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm device clinical trial of robot-assisted TCD (raTCD) versus TTE for RLS diagnosis at 6 clinical sites in patients who presented with an event suspicious for embolic cerebrovascular ischemia from October 6, 2020 to October 20, 2021. raTCD was performed with standard TCD bubble study technique. TTE bubble study was performed per local standards. The primary outcome was rate of RLS detection by raTCD versus TTE. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled, 129 evaluable (intent to scan) and 121 subjects had complete data per protocol. In the intent to scan cohort, mean age was 60±15 years, 47% were women, and all qualifying events were diagnosed as ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. raTCD was positive for RLS in 82 subjects (64%) and TTE was positive in 26 (20%; absolute difference 43.4% [95% CI, 35.2%–52.0%]; P<0.001). On prespecified secondary analysis, large RLS was detected by raTCD in 35 subjects (27%) versus 13 (10%) by TTE (absolute difference 17.0% [95% CI, 11.5%–24.5%]; P<0.001). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: raTCD was safe and ≈3 times more likely to diagnose RLS than TTE. TTE completely missed or underdiagnosed two thirds of large shunts diagnosed by raTCD. The raTCD device, used by health professionals with no prior TCD training, may allow providers to achieve the known sensitivity of TCD for RLS and patent foramen ovale detection without the need for an experienced operator to perform the test. Pending confirmatory studies, TCD appears to be the superior screen for RLS compared with TTE (funded by NeuraSignal). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04604015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10589435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105894352023-10-22 Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection Rubin, Mark N. Shah, Ruchir Devlin, Thomas Youn, Teddy S. Waters, Michael F. Volpi, John J. Stayman, Aaron Douville, Colleen M. Lowenkopf, Ted Tsivgoulis, Georgios Alexandrov, Andrei V. Stroke Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Right to left shunt (RLS), including patent foramen ovale, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. RLS/patent foramen ovale diagnosis is made by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography, which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD), which is noninvasive and accurate but scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm device clinical trial of robot-assisted TCD (raTCD) versus TTE for RLS diagnosis at 6 clinical sites in patients who presented with an event suspicious for embolic cerebrovascular ischemia from October 6, 2020 to October 20, 2021. raTCD was performed with standard TCD bubble study technique. TTE bubble study was performed per local standards. The primary outcome was rate of RLS detection by raTCD versus TTE. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled, 129 evaluable (intent to scan) and 121 subjects had complete data per protocol. In the intent to scan cohort, mean age was 60±15 years, 47% were women, and all qualifying events were diagnosed as ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. raTCD was positive for RLS in 82 subjects (64%) and TTE was positive in 26 (20%; absolute difference 43.4% [95% CI, 35.2%–52.0%]; P<0.001). On prespecified secondary analysis, large RLS was detected by raTCD in 35 subjects (27%) versus 13 (10%) by TTE (absolute difference 17.0% [95% CI, 11.5%–24.5%]; P<0.001). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: raTCD was safe and ≈3 times more likely to diagnose RLS than TTE. TTE completely missed or underdiagnosed two thirds of large shunts diagnosed by raTCD. The raTCD device, used by health professionals with no prior TCD training, may allow providers to achieve the known sensitivity of TCD for RLS and patent foramen ovale detection without the need for an experienced operator to perform the test. Pending confirmatory studies, TCD appears to be the superior screen for RLS compared with TTE (funded by NeuraSignal). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04604015. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-05 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10589435/ /pubmed/37795589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043380 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Rubin, Mark N. Shah, Ruchir Devlin, Thomas Youn, Teddy S. Waters, Michael F. Volpi, John J. Stayman, Aaron Douville, Colleen M. Lowenkopf, Ted Tsivgoulis, Georgios Alexandrov, Andrei V. Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection |
title | Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection |
title_full | Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection |
title_fullStr | Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection |
title_short | Robot-Assisted Transcranial Doppler Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Right to Left Shunt Detection |
title_sort | robot-assisted transcranial doppler versus transthoracic echocardiography for right to left shunt detection |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubinmarkn robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT shahruchir robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT devlinthomas robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT younteddys robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT watersmichaelf robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT volpijohnj robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT staymanaaron robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT douvillecolleenm robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT lowenkopfted robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT tsivgoulisgeorgios robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection AT alexandrovandreiv robotassistedtranscranialdopplerversustransthoracicechocardiographyforrighttoleftshuntdetection |