Cargando…

Estimating the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Costa Rica: modelling seroprevalence data in a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND: The true incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Costa Rica was likely much higher than officially reported, because infection is often associated with mild symptoms and testing was limited by official guidelines and socio-economic factors. METHODS: Using serology to define natural infectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fantin, Romain, Agarwala, Neha, Aparicio, Amada, Pfeiffer, Ruth, Waterboer, Tim, Abdelnour, Arturo, Butt, Julia, Flock, Julia, Remans, Kim, Prevots, D. Rebecca, Porras, Carolina, Hildesheim, Allan, Loria, Viviana, Gail, Mitchell H., Herrero, Rolando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100616
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The true incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Costa Rica was likely much higher than officially reported, because infection is often associated with mild symptoms and testing was limited by official guidelines and socio-economic factors. METHODS: Using serology to define natural infection, we developed a statistical model to estimate the true cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Costa Rica early in the pandemic. We estimated seroprevalence from 2223 blood samples collected from November 2020 to October 2021 from 1976 population-based controls from the RESPIRA study. Samples were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and the receptor-binding-domain of the spike proteins. Using a generalized linear model, we estimated the ratio of true infections to officially reported cases. Applying these ratios to officially reported totals by age, sex, and geographic area, we estimated the true number of infections in the study area, where 70% of Costa Ricans reside. We adjusted the seroprevalence estimates for antibody decay over time, estimated from 1562 blood samples from 996 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases. FINDINGS: The estimated total proportion infected (ETPI) was 4.0 times higher than the officially reported total proportion infected (OTPI). By December 16th, 2021, the ETPI was 47% [42–52] while the OTPI was 12%. In children and adolescents, the ETPI was 11.0 times higher than the OTPI. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that nearly half the population had been infected by the end of 2021. By the end of 2022, it is likely that a large majority of the population had been infected. FUNDING: This work was sponsored and funded by the 10.13039/100000060National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases through the 10.13039/100000054National Cancer Institute, the Science, Innovation, Technology and Telecommunications Ministry of Costa Rica, and Costa Rican Biomedical Research Agency-Fundacion INCIENSA (grant N/A).