Cargando…
Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00122-6 |
_version_ | 1785123887524085760 |
---|---|
author | Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi Di Carlo, Stefano Crespi, Andrea Severgnini, Paolo Fedele, Luisa Luciana Cofini, Vincenza Necozione, Stefano Musella, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi Di Carlo, Stefano Crespi, Andrea Severgnini, Paolo Fedele, Luisa Luciana Cofini, Vincenza Necozione, Stefano Musella, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze data from 3291 procedures recorded in our institutional database, to better define the safety profile of spinal prilocaine and the incidence of complications and side effects. All clinical data, prospectively collected from 2011 to 2019 in an Italian tertiary hospital, of patients treated with spinal anesthesia performed with 40 mg of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine, according to our internal protocol of day surgery, were analyzed. Surgical procedures included saphenectomy (28.5%, n = 937), knee arthroscopy (26.8%, n = 882), proctologic surgery (15.16%, n = 499), and inguinal canal surgery (14.9%, n = 491). Anesthesia-related complication was represented by urinary retention (1.09%, n = 36), lipotimia (0.75%, n = 25), and postoperative nausea (0.33%, n = 11); arrhythmic events were uncommon (0.18%, n = 6). One case of persistent hypotension and 2 cases of persistent hypertension were reported. Persistent motor or sensory block (lasting more than 5 h) was experienced by 7 patients. One patient (0.03%), who underwent knee arthroscopy, experienced pelvic pain lasting for 6 h, compatible with a transient neurological symptom. Proctologic surgery was a factor associated with unplanned admission due to anesthesia-related complications (OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2–14%). The number of complications related to the method was low as well as the need for hospitalization. This drug is valid and safe for the most performed day surgery procedures; however, further trials are needed to investigate the incidence of complications in the days following the procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10589922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105899222023-10-22 Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi Di Carlo, Stefano Crespi, Andrea Severgnini, Paolo Fedele, Luisa Luciana Cofini, Vincenza Necozione, Stefano Musella, Giuseppe J Anesth Analg Crit Care Original Article Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze data from 3291 procedures recorded in our institutional database, to better define the safety profile of spinal prilocaine and the incidence of complications and side effects. All clinical data, prospectively collected from 2011 to 2019 in an Italian tertiary hospital, of patients treated with spinal anesthesia performed with 40 mg of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine, according to our internal protocol of day surgery, were analyzed. Surgical procedures included saphenectomy (28.5%, n = 937), knee arthroscopy (26.8%, n = 882), proctologic surgery (15.16%, n = 499), and inguinal canal surgery (14.9%, n = 491). Anesthesia-related complication was represented by urinary retention (1.09%, n = 36), lipotimia (0.75%, n = 25), and postoperative nausea (0.33%, n = 11); arrhythmic events were uncommon (0.18%, n = 6). One case of persistent hypotension and 2 cases of persistent hypertension were reported. Persistent motor or sensory block (lasting more than 5 h) was experienced by 7 patients. One patient (0.03%), who underwent knee arthroscopy, experienced pelvic pain lasting for 6 h, compatible with a transient neurological symptom. Proctologic surgery was a factor associated with unplanned admission due to anesthesia-related complications (OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2–14%). The number of complications related to the method was low as well as the need for hospitalization. This drug is valid and safe for the most performed day surgery procedures; however, further trials are needed to investigate the incidence of complications in the days following the procedure. BioMed Central 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10589922/ /pubmed/37864260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00122-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi Di Carlo, Stefano Crespi, Andrea Severgnini, Paolo Fedele, Luisa Luciana Cofini, Vincenza Necozione, Stefano Musella, Giuseppe Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
title | Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
title_full | Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
title_fullStr | Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
title_short | Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00122-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ambrosoliandrealuigi safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT dicarlostefano safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT crespiandrea safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT severgninipaolo safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT fedeleluisaluciana safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT cofinivincenza safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT necozionestefano safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients AT musellagiuseppe safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients |