Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients

Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi, Di Carlo, Stefano, Crespi, Andrea, Severgnini, Paolo, Fedele, Luisa Luciana, Cofini, Vincenza, Necozione, Stefano, Musella, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00122-6
_version_ 1785123887524085760
author Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi
Di Carlo, Stefano
Crespi, Andrea
Severgnini, Paolo
Fedele, Luisa Luciana
Cofini, Vincenza
Necozione, Stefano
Musella, Giuseppe
author_facet Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi
Di Carlo, Stefano
Crespi, Andrea
Severgnini, Paolo
Fedele, Luisa Luciana
Cofini, Vincenza
Necozione, Stefano
Musella, Giuseppe
author_sort Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi
collection PubMed
description Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze data from 3291 procedures recorded in our institutional database, to better define the safety profile of spinal prilocaine and the incidence of complications and side effects. All clinical data, prospectively collected from 2011 to 2019 in an Italian tertiary hospital, of patients treated with spinal anesthesia performed with 40 mg of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine, according to our internal protocol of day surgery, were analyzed. Surgical procedures included saphenectomy (28.5%, n = 937), knee arthroscopy (26.8%, n = 882), proctologic surgery (15.16%, n = 499), and inguinal canal surgery (14.9%, n = 491). Anesthesia-related complication was represented by urinary retention (1.09%, n = 36), lipotimia (0.75%, n = 25), and postoperative nausea (0.33%, n = 11); arrhythmic events were uncommon (0.18%, n = 6). One case of persistent hypotension and 2 cases of persistent hypertension were reported. Persistent motor or sensory block (lasting more than 5 h) was experienced by 7 patients. One patient (0.03%), who underwent knee arthroscopy, experienced pelvic pain lasting for 6 h, compatible with a transient neurological symptom. Proctologic surgery was a factor associated with unplanned admission due to anesthesia-related complications (OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2–14%). The number of complications related to the method was low as well as the need for hospitalization. This drug is valid and safe for the most performed day surgery procedures; however, further trials are needed to investigate the incidence of complications in the days following the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10589922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105899222023-10-22 Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi Di Carlo, Stefano Crespi, Andrea Severgnini, Paolo Fedele, Luisa Luciana Cofini, Vincenza Necozione, Stefano Musella, Giuseppe J Anesth Analg Crit Care Original Article Spinal anesthesia is considered safe and reliable for most surgical procedures involving the lower part of the body, but its use in the ambulatory setting requires drugs with rapid onset and regression of the motor and sensory block-like prilocaine. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze data from 3291 procedures recorded in our institutional database, to better define the safety profile of spinal prilocaine and the incidence of complications and side effects. All clinical data, prospectively collected from 2011 to 2019 in an Italian tertiary hospital, of patients treated with spinal anesthesia performed with 40 mg of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine, according to our internal protocol of day surgery, were analyzed. Surgical procedures included saphenectomy (28.5%, n = 937), knee arthroscopy (26.8%, n = 882), proctologic surgery (15.16%, n = 499), and inguinal canal surgery (14.9%, n = 491). Anesthesia-related complication was represented by urinary retention (1.09%, n = 36), lipotimia (0.75%, n = 25), and postoperative nausea (0.33%, n = 11); arrhythmic events were uncommon (0.18%, n = 6). One case of persistent hypotension and 2 cases of persistent hypertension were reported. Persistent motor or sensory block (lasting more than 5 h) was experienced by 7 patients. One patient (0.03%), who underwent knee arthroscopy, experienced pelvic pain lasting for 6 h, compatible with a transient neurological symptom. Proctologic surgery was a factor associated with unplanned admission due to anesthesia-related complications (OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2–14%). The number of complications related to the method was low as well as the need for hospitalization. This drug is valid and safe for the most performed day surgery procedures; however, further trials are needed to investigate the incidence of complications in the days following the procedure. BioMed Central 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10589922/ /pubmed/37864260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00122-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ambrosoli, Andrea Luigi
Di Carlo, Stefano
Crespi, Andrea
Severgnini, Paolo
Fedele, Luisa Luciana
Cofini, Vincenza
Necozione, Stefano
Musella, Giuseppe
Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
title Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
title_full Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
title_short Safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
title_sort safety and effectiveness of prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in day surgery setting: a retrospective study on a sample of 3291 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00122-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ambrosoliandrealuigi safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT dicarlostefano safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT crespiandrea safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT severgninipaolo safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT fedeleluisaluciana safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT cofinivincenza safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT necozionestefano safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients
AT musellagiuseppe safetyandeffectivenessofprilocaineforspinalanesthesiaindaysurgerysettingaretrospectivestudyonasampleof3291patients