Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem, inflammatory, systemic granulomatous disease with unknown etiology. Despite the current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar(®) Gel (repos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bindra, Jas, Chopra, Ishveen, Hayes, Kyle, Niewoehner, John, Panaccio, Mary, Wan, George J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868649
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S428466
_version_ 1785123936234635264
author Bindra, Jas
Chopra, Ishveen
Hayes, Kyle
Niewoehner, John
Panaccio, Mary
Wan, George J
author_facet Bindra, Jas
Chopra, Ishveen
Hayes, Kyle
Niewoehner, John
Panaccio, Mary
Wan, George J
author_sort Bindra, Jas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem, inflammatory, systemic granulomatous disease with unknown etiology. Despite the current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection) versus SoC in patients with advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over 2 and 3 years. METHODS: A probabilistic cohort-level state-transition approach was used for this cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients were monitored at the end of a 3-month cycle for the attainment of partial or complete response. Patients in the partial, complete, or no-response state were allowed to transition in each of these states at each 3-month cycle. Following the attainment of response, patients could have a durable response or relapse to a no-response state. Patients in a no-response state received treatment and could transition into a response or no-response state based on the probability of treatment success with the respective treatment. Clinical parameters and health utility data were sourced from the Acthar Gel in Participants with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis (PULSAR) trial (NCT03320070) and healthcare utilization, costs, and disutilities were sourced from the published literature. Base case analysis considered a payer perspective over 2 years. RESULTS: From a payer perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $134,796 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $39,179 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. From a societal perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an ICER of $117,622 per QALY and $21,967 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent with the base case. CONCLUSION: The results from this cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that Acthar Gel is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis compared to the SoC from the US payer and societal perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10590138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105901382023-10-22 Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis Bindra, Jas Chopra, Ishveen Hayes, Kyle Niewoehner, John Panaccio, Mary Wan, George J Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem, inflammatory, systemic granulomatous disease with unknown etiology. Despite the current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection) versus SoC in patients with advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over 2 and 3 years. METHODS: A probabilistic cohort-level state-transition approach was used for this cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients were monitored at the end of a 3-month cycle for the attainment of partial or complete response. Patients in the partial, complete, or no-response state were allowed to transition in each of these states at each 3-month cycle. Following the attainment of response, patients could have a durable response or relapse to a no-response state. Patients in a no-response state received treatment and could transition into a response or no-response state based on the probability of treatment success with the respective treatment. Clinical parameters and health utility data were sourced from the Acthar Gel in Participants with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis (PULSAR) trial (NCT03320070) and healthcare utilization, costs, and disutilities were sourced from the published literature. Base case analysis considered a payer perspective over 2 years. RESULTS: From a payer perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $134,796 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $39,179 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. From a societal perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an ICER of $117,622 per QALY and $21,967 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent with the base case. CONCLUSION: The results from this cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that Acthar Gel is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis compared to the SoC from the US payer and societal perspectives. Dove 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10590138/ /pubmed/37868649 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S428466 Text en © 2023 Bindra et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bindra, Jas
Chopra, Ishveen
Hayes, Kyle
Niewoehner, John
Panaccio, Mary
Wan, George J
Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
title Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of acthar gel versus standard of care for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868649
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S428466
work_keys_str_mv AT bindrajas costeffectivenessofacthargelversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadvancedsymptomaticsarcoidosis
AT chopraishveen costeffectivenessofacthargelversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadvancedsymptomaticsarcoidosis
AT hayeskyle costeffectivenessofacthargelversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadvancedsymptomaticsarcoidosis
AT niewoehnerjohn costeffectivenessofacthargelversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadvancedsymptomaticsarcoidosis
AT panacciomary costeffectivenessofacthargelversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadvancedsymptomaticsarcoidosis
AT wangeorgej costeffectivenessofacthargelversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofadvancedsymptomaticsarcoidosis