Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

For gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) affecting women of reproductive age, the chemotherapy-first approach is often preferred over the surgery-first approach. Low-risk GTN is treated with a chemotherapy-first approach, but the number of courses required can affect fertility. A surgery-first...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamijo, Kyosuke, Ishida, Kentaro, Oide, Shiho, Anan, Keisuke, Taito, Shunsuke, Kataoka, Yuki, Chikazawa, Kenro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868570
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45726
_version_ 1785123952515874816
author Kamijo, Kyosuke
Ishida, Kentaro
Oide, Shiho
Anan, Keisuke
Taito, Shunsuke
Kataoka, Yuki
Chikazawa, Kenro
author_facet Kamijo, Kyosuke
Ishida, Kentaro
Oide, Shiho
Anan, Keisuke
Taito, Shunsuke
Kataoka, Yuki
Chikazawa, Kenro
author_sort Kamijo, Kyosuke
collection PubMed
description For gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) affecting women of reproductive age, the chemotherapy-first approach is often preferred over the surgery-first approach. Low-risk GTN is treated with a chemotherapy-first approach, but the number of courses required can affect fertility. A surgery-first approach may decrease the number of chemotherapy courses, but its efficacy and safety compared to a chemotherapy-first approach are unclear. Thus, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the surgery-first approach compared to the chemotherapy-first approach in treating low-risk GTN. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for relevant articles in July 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcome measures were conducted using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were remission, the mean number of chemotherapy courses required to cure, and adverse events. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This study protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/kysvn/). Studies for low-risk GTN included a qualitative synthesis (with 2,192 participants and ten studies, eight of which were about second uterine curettage and two about hysterectomy) and a meta-analysis (with 138 participants and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared first-line treatments of second uterine curettage and chemotherapy). Second uterine curettage may result in little to no difference in remission (risk ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.05; low certainty) and a slight reduction in adverse events (risk ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-1.60; low certainty). The evidence is very uncertain on the mean number of chemotherapy courses (mean difference: 2.84 lower, 95% confidence interval: 7.31 lower to 1.63 higher; very low certainty). Based on clinical outcomes, second uterine curettage can be comparable to the chemotherapy-first approach as a first-line treatment option for low-risk GTN; however, the overall certainty of the evidence was low or very low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10590247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105902472023-10-22 Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kamijo, Kyosuke Ishida, Kentaro Oide, Shiho Anan, Keisuke Taito, Shunsuke Kataoka, Yuki Chikazawa, Kenro Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology For gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) affecting women of reproductive age, the chemotherapy-first approach is often preferred over the surgery-first approach. Low-risk GTN is treated with a chemotherapy-first approach, but the number of courses required can affect fertility. A surgery-first approach may decrease the number of chemotherapy courses, but its efficacy and safety compared to a chemotherapy-first approach are unclear. Thus, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the surgery-first approach compared to the chemotherapy-first approach in treating low-risk GTN. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for relevant articles in July 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcome measures were conducted using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were remission, the mean number of chemotherapy courses required to cure, and adverse events. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This study protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/kysvn/). Studies for low-risk GTN included a qualitative synthesis (with 2,192 participants and ten studies, eight of which were about second uterine curettage and two about hysterectomy) and a meta-analysis (with 138 participants and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared first-line treatments of second uterine curettage and chemotherapy). Second uterine curettage may result in little to no difference in remission (risk ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.05; low certainty) and a slight reduction in adverse events (risk ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-1.60; low certainty). The evidence is very uncertain on the mean number of chemotherapy courses (mean difference: 2.84 lower, 95% confidence interval: 7.31 lower to 1.63 higher; very low certainty). Based on clinical outcomes, second uterine curettage can be comparable to the chemotherapy-first approach as a first-line treatment option for low-risk GTN; however, the overall certainty of the evidence was low or very low. Cureus 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10590247/ /pubmed/37868570 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45726 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kamijo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Kamijo, Kyosuke
Ishida, Kentaro
Oide, Shiho
Anan, Keisuke
Taito, Shunsuke
Kataoka, Yuki
Chikazawa, Kenro
Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of the Surgery-First Approach Compared to the Chemotherapy-First Approach for Treating Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of the surgery-first approach compared to the chemotherapy-first approach for treating low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37868570
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45726
work_keys_str_mv AT kamijokyosuke efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ishidakentaro efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oideshiho efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anankeisuke efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taitoshunsuke efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kataokayuki efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chikazawakenro efficacyandsafetyofthesurgeryfirstapproachcomparedtothechemotherapyfirstapproachfortreatinglowriskgestationaltrophoblasticneoplasiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis